Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 11:53 AM Aug 2016

More Than Half Of Clinton Foundation’s Major Donors Would Be Barred Under New Rule

By Rosalind S. Helderman, John Wagner and Anu Narayanswamy August 19 at 10:43 PM

More than half of the Clinton Foundation’s major donors would be prevented from contributing to the charity under the self-imposed ban on corporate and foreign donors the foundation said this week it would adopt if Hillary Clinton won the White House, according to a new Washington Post analysis of foundation donations.

The findings underscore the extent to which the Clintons’ sprawling global charity has come to rely on financial support from industries and overseas interests, a point that has drawn criticism from Republicans and some liberals who have said the donations represent conflicts of interest for a potential president.

The analysis, which examined donor lists posted on the foundation’s website, found that 53 percent of the donors who have given $1 million or more to the charity are corporations or foreign citizens, groups or governments. The list includes the governments of Saudi Arabia and Australia, the British bank Barclay’s, and major U.S. companies such as Coca-Cola and ExxonMobil.

[The inside story of how the Clintons built a $2 billion global empire]

The foundation’s announcement drew skepticism Friday from the right and the left as critics wondered why the Clintons have never before cut off corporate and overseas money to their charity — and why they would wait until after the election to do so.

more...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/more-than-half-of-clinton-foundations-major-donors-would-be-barred-under-new-rule/2016/08/19/f2d21776-6631-11e6-be4e-23fc4d4d12b4_story.html?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_clintonfoundation-820pm:homepage/story

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More Than Half Of Clinton Foundation’s Major Donors Would Be Barred Under New Rule (Original Post) Purveyor Aug 2016 OP
The Clintons need to disband the Foundation or cut their ties. It's a trouble spot for sure Arazi Aug 2016 #1
No, they should not. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2016 #2
They do great work. This is 2016 version of "Swiftboaters for Truth" emulatorloo Aug 2016 #3
This ^^^^^^^^^^^ Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2016 #5
Why wouldn't they wait till after the election? There would be no need to cut off these donations pnwmom Aug 2016 #4

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
1. The Clintons need to disband the Foundation or cut their ties. It's a trouble spot for sure
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 12:35 PM
Aug 2016

Kick and rec

emulatorloo

(44,211 posts)
3. They do great work. This is 2016 version of "Swiftboaters for Truth"
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 01:10 PM
Aug 2016

It is Rove 101: take your opponents strengths and lie about them until they become liabilities.

It is an excellent charitable organization, so of course they are attempting to paint it as evil and sinister.

pnwmom

(109,010 posts)
4. Why wouldn't they wait till after the election? There would be no need to cut off these donations
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 01:39 PM
Aug 2016

if she was a private citizen.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»More Than Half Of Clinton...