Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNational Review - "Could a President Trump Really Impound All Immigrant Payments to Mexico?"
I think we are now seeing some details about the new kinder and gentler Trump.
Instead of a physical deportation force, Trump is proposing that the U.S. just steal money earned by poor immigrants in the U.S. and sent home to their families and need, and use that money to pay for the Great Wall of Trump. That way, by starving their families back home, Trump could force Mexican immigrants to self-deport.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/422744/donald-trump-remittance-plan-evaluation
Donald Trumps new immigration plan boldly declares that, Mexico must pay for the border wall and, until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all remittance payments derived from illegal wages.
Would that even be possible? A Trump administration could erect a lot of legal, regulatory, and logistical obstacles to transferring money from the U.S. to Mexico. But those moves would enrage the banks and financial institutions that make money off the transfers, and probably spur interest in transfer methods that escape the attention and grasp of law enforcement.
Earlier this year, Mexicos central bank released data indicating Mexicans abroad sent home $23.6 billion in 2014, almost all of it from the United States. Payments from workers abroad make up just 2 percent of Mexican GDP, but they can play a much bigger role in particular local economies. One study concluded that the poorest rural areas of the country derive 19.5 percent of their income from remittances. Whatever their economic impact, the payments are widespread: An estimated 83 percent of Mexicans who enter the country illegally send money home. But so do 73 percent of legal Mexican immigrants making a blanket restriction on remittances virtually impossible.
* * *
Trumps pledge to impound remittance payments implies seizure, an act that would face a high legal bar to clear. But the government has successfully seized money in the accounts of criminals who smuggle illegal immigrants across the border.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1140 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
National Review - "Could a President Trump Really Impound All Immigrant Payments to Mexico?" (Original Post)
TomCADem
Aug 2016
OP
procon
(15,805 posts)1. No surprise. He also thought we should steal the oil from the people of Iraq.
For someone who tries to bill himself as the "law and order president", he sounds more like a thieving crook.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)2. Sounds like it would need a declaration of war.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)3. Godwins rule no longer applies to this bunch
The Nazis did the same thing with the Jews, robbed them
Gothmog
(145,195 posts)4. Trump's plan is clearly illegal
duncang
(1,907 posts)5. Fits in with some of the stuff he has done
Not paying people. Just SOP for dipshit.