Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
Mon Aug 22, 2016, 10:48 PM Aug 2016

National Review - "Could a President Trump Really Impound All Immigrant Payments to Mexico?"

I think we are now seeing some details about the new kinder and gentler Trump.

Instead of a physical deportation force, Trump is proposing that the U.S. just steal money earned by poor immigrants in the U.S. and sent home to their families and need, and use that money to pay for the Great Wall of Trump. That way, by starving their families back home, Trump could force Mexican immigrants to self-deport.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/422744/donald-trump-remittance-plan-evaluation

Donald Trump’s new immigration plan boldly declares that, “Mexico must pay for the border wall and, until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all remittance payments derived from illegal wages.”

Would that even be possible? A Trump administration could erect a lot of legal, regulatory, and logistical obstacles to transferring money from the U.S. to Mexico. But those moves would enrage the banks and financial institutions that make money off the transfers, and probably spur interest in transfer methods that escape the attention and grasp of law enforcement.

Earlier this year, Mexico’s central bank released data indicating Mexicans abroad sent home $23.6 billion in 2014, almost all of it from the United States. Payments from workers abroad make up just 2 percent of Mexican GDP, but they can play a much bigger role in particular local economies. One study concluded that “the poorest rural areas” of the country derive 19.5 percent of their income from remittances. Whatever their economic impact, the payments are widespread: An estimated 83 percent of Mexicans who enter the country illegally send money home. But so do 73 percent of legal Mexican immigrants — making a blanket restriction on remittances virtually impossible.

* * *
Trump’s pledge to “impound” remittance payments implies seizure, an act that would face a high legal bar to clear. But the government has successfully seized money in the accounts of criminals who smuggle illegal immigrants across the border.


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
National Review - "Could a President Trump Really Impound All Immigrant Payments to Mexico?" (Original Post) TomCADem Aug 2016 OP
No surprise. He also thought we should steal the oil from the people of Iraq. procon Aug 2016 #1
Sounds like it would need a declaration of war. NurseJackie Aug 2016 #2
Godwins rule no longer applies to this bunch GusBob Aug 2016 #3
Trump's plan is clearly illegal Gothmog Aug 2016 #4
Fits in with some of the stuff he has done duncang Aug 2016 #5

procon

(15,805 posts)
1. No surprise. He also thought we should steal the oil from the people of Iraq.
Mon Aug 22, 2016, 11:00 PM
Aug 2016

For someone who tries to bill himself as the "law and order president", he sounds more like a thieving crook.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»National Review - "Could ...