2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMaking the deplorable comments then regretting, is not good strategy
I'm not sure who is advising her on this but this was a mistake. I saw the comments late last night and i expected a fight on twitter and comment section of news articles this morning (this is my way of fighting off the trolls who bash Clinton. I make sure i make my daily dose of pro Hillary comments in yahoo articles, politico, news websites, to counter pro trump idiots)
but what i found surprising was although there was an avalanche of anti Hillary comments and it wasn't a pretty sight by any means there was also A LOT OF us Hillary supporters and although out numbered we were putting up a good fight pointing at all the racist shit he sais. Bringing to light what hillary said was right and there is a lot of trump supporters who are nationalist and racists.
Then Hillary apologized or regretted or whatever and that took the wind out of my sails. Then the people i was arguing with are basically like " why are you defending something your own candidate is apologizing for"
I think the decision has to be made either we draw a line in the sand like she did last night and go to war with these racists and show the MAJORITY of the country what racist and bigots we are up against. OR we do what we did during the convention in which we countered the darkness from trump that hillary is going to be a president for all people democrats independents and republicans. which seemed to work great as her poll numbers shot up.
Im not a political consultant and ill certainly keep my day job. I know hillarys advisers are much more smarter then me but seeing the avalanche of anti hillary comments on twitter and yahoo comments and facebook has got me down this morning.
BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)She was also right to zero in on the worst of it in her apology or statement of regret, if you prefer. And that was putting an actual number on the number of "deplorables." She could have spent the rest of the campaign explaining that one.
anneboleyn
(5,611 posts)Clinton and her surrogates need to counter this hard by stating that she was referring to specific incidents and people (like Bannon). Every time -- the Clinton people need to give evidence and not back down. She needs to counter, hard, this idiotic suggestion from the Trump campaign that Hillary was denigrating "hard-working Americans" (barf).
BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)All they have to do is point to that and put the onus on him. I'm not worried.
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)No one is going to believe she didn't mean it.
Response to agnostic102 (Original post)
MichiganVote This message was self-deleted by its author.
anneboleyn
(5,611 posts)comment to Romney's 48% and Obama's "guns and religion." Clinton's comment IS TRUE and I wish she had not apologized. She needs to state that she was referring to specific Trump people like Bannon, and she needs to dismiss the stupid idea that she was saying something elitist when it has been demonstrated many times that Trump enlists racists. The media bias is just disgusting. Trump and his circus say the most unbelievable nonsense but Hillary makes a TRUE comment about many Trump supporters, and the media starts covering it hysterically. As I said she should not have apologized.
Response to anneboleyn (Reply #12)
MichiganVote This message was self-deleted by its author.
anneboleyn
(5,611 posts)is accurate and mainly focused on the Trump voters who felt disenfranchised -- not the "deplorables" like Bannon.
still_one
(92,187 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Also, the general public now realizes that corporate media (for years) do cover-up for the racists, etc.
And corporate media is now supporting that known fact.
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)You can see my other comment on this thread.
lostnfound
(16,177 posts)The truth hurts.
My right wing relatives who are not particularly racist or sexist are distraught by Hillarys comments.
The comments hit their mark.
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)supporting and what, and understand who your bedfellows are and what they represent.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)and here is her original comment - This is the basket of deplorable followers....The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic you name it.
And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up, she added.
The feigned indignation was expected...if the shoe fits - wear it!
nolabear
(41,960 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,189 posts).
You will never hear Trump or any other GOPer apologize.
Making an apology is what signals weakness in their minds.
By waffling on her statement, it gives Trump a little oneupsmanship on the issue.
She should have identified 5 categories of supporters who are distasteful and said to show why they aren't.
Put the ball back in Trump's corner to defend those reprobates.
.
nolabear
(41,960 posts)asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)The rest of her original comment -
The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic you name it.
And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up, she added.
BlueInPhilly
(870 posts)Did you really just say that? How many time really has he won? This is not a big deal and it should stop soon.
Better to clarify than have your surrogates act as translators. This news blip will die an early and natural death, because you know Trump will say something so egregious again.
Mass
(27,315 posts)"Last night I was 'grossly generalistic,' and that's never a good idea. I regret saying 'half' -- that was wrong," Clinton said in a statement in which she also vowed to call out "bigotry" in Trump's campaign.
Of course, in our world where the media are really bad, this may not make a difference, but this is actually what she said.
NoGoodNamesLeft
(2,056 posts)She only said that she regretted using the word "half" because it was wrong. Saying it was wrong is correct, because half of Trump's supporters are not deplorable. If she had said half of them are ignorant or foolish or uneducated or stupid...well, that would have been the truth. But half of his supporters are not deplorable. Some absolutely ARE deplorable and by saying what she did she has changed the subject away from those stupid emails and to the undeniable fact that Trump is attracting a lot of very disgusting people.
This was a win for her, 100%.
BumRushDaShow
(128,905 posts)so it is a double-down on a term that has now gone viral as a descriptor.
The thing is - when you call these Trump folks what they are - "racists", "bigots", "misogynists", the media laughs and dismisses the characterizations by defining them as "personal attacks" on an individual or individuals. But when you use the term "deplorable", you are not describing the person per se but their behavior (an adverb), so they have a difficult time trying to twist it around to be any specific characterizations that they have already deemed "meaningless buzzwords".
Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,905 posts)just had to! The day it hit the media I just had to have it!
meow2u3
(24,761 posts)They just proved HRC right. They're not only pathetic bigots, they actually are proud of being social outcasts!
BumRushDaShow
(128,905 posts)getting caught up in the "Simon Says" game that they will automatically knee-jerk the opposite response to what is expected - either rejecting anything reasonable or embracing anything insulting. Of course there is probably a subset out there who don't even know what the word "deplorable" means.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)(And no this isn't just baseless Hillary pumping)
She dominated the news cycle and provoked discussion with a pretty factual remark that no one has been willing to say and then instead of apologizing for the statement, she apologized for ascribing a size, "half", and then doubled down on the "deplorable" by listing the many deplorable acts of Donald Trump.
Now every time someone tries to bring up that remark and when Donald brings it up during the debate, she has a go to litany of Donald's racist best hits that she now has a reason to recite. Republicans can scream "Basket of Deplorables" all they want, but they invite a avalanche of racist and bigoted Trumper behavior in response.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)only on the use of half
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Protalker
(418 posts)She is better on the high road. Anyway half may be low.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)I would have preferred no regret at all, but if she had to regret anything, putting a number on the size of the douchebaggery is an ok thing to regret.
Move on. Enjoy what's left of your Saturday.
wisteria
(19,581 posts)She only took back the comment referring to half. The rest remained he same.
Mayberry Machiavelli
(21,096 posts)She wasn't taking into account how the dumb media will simply report it as she apologized and backed off and therefore it was a gaffe.
She just neutralized the potential benefit of what was a good, intentional tactic and it could wind up being a negative for her.
bmstee01
(453 posts)40% of Trump supporters think blacks are lazier than whites.
Soooo maybe she was 10% off.
I don't know anyone that is really outraged by it except people that won't vote for Hillary anyway
doc03
(35,328 posts)apologize for calling Mexicans rapists and murders, making fun of a disabled person, his comments about women or his comments about
Muslims? Now when they bring up her comment she can say I apologized for my remarks, when is Mr. Trump going to apologize for his. It gives her the opportunity to remind people of the stuff he has said. Every f---g Trump supporter I know is a racist asshole.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)and have seen much support except in places that don't matter...like JPR or FR...but thanks for the concern...I will process the concern and see if I need my fainting couch.
Rex
(65,616 posts)A concern vault.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Our candidate makes mistakes, their candidate lies his ass off.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)They are for the most part racist pieces of shit.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)... this thread's respondents and read the whole "regret." She just re-iterated what she led with in the first place, that "half" was a big generalization. Then she had an opportunity to re-state the whole point. Good planning, I'd say.