Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:32 PM Sep 2016

Election Model Update

Last edited Mon Sep 12, 2016, 01:19 AM - Edit history (1)

Two models: one that only uses current polling, and one that takes the current poll as a starting point and and includes a random drift term...essentially projecting the current scenario forward to the election. See Original Model Writeup (below) for details.

Previous model writeups:

9/1/2016 update

8/16/2016 update

Update with drift included 8/6/2016

Original Model Writeup 8/3/2016

Model projections:

Probability of D win using current polling: 84.5%
average number of electoral votes: 312
median number of electoral votes: 314
most common electoral scenario: 317 electoral votes



Probability of D win projected forward to November election: 64.0%
average number of electoral votes: 288
median number of electoral votes: 289
most common electoral scenario: 289 electoral votes



Current Popular Vote Spread Estimate: +3.8% Clinton (estimated by multiplying statewide leads by turnout 2012 state turnout)


Analysis: Some minor tweaks to model, mostly in the code for grabbing data from HuffPost pollster. I missed an update last week, so I can't say any slide in HRC's poll numbers has been arrested. I can say that her numbers look about the same as two weeks ago, some slippage in the projected numbers, but that's due to changes in the polling variance over time. I use this variance to construct a daily random "drift" variable. In general, the variance in D leaning states' polling has gone up, the R leaning states show less variance. So it's more likely to randomly drift to a Trump win than a few weeks ago. The mean, median, and mode of electoral vote leads for Clinton haven't changed a lot though, which bodes well for continued stability.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Election Model Update (Original Post) Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 OP
Proud to be one of the anonymous blue saltpoint Sep 2016 #1
New vadermike Sep 2016 #2
My algo may have gotten those numbers... Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #3
They will vadermike Sep 2016 #4
UPDATE: ADDED a national popular vote feature Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #5

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
5. UPDATE: ADDED a national popular vote feature
Mon Sep 12, 2016, 01:22 AM
Sep 2016

Very simply implemented. Just multiplying the most recent lead for Clinton in each poll by the number of ballots cast in each state from 2012. Around 3.8%, pretty close to Nate Silver's estimate of a lead of about 4% for HRC.

I will be extending this to 1) generate error bars for the estimate and 2) Generate a similar estimate for the "election day projection" scenario.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Election Model Update