Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 04:35 PM Sep 2016

Interesting to see what happens with Sam Wang's Princeton Election Consortium at the next update

UPI/CVoter (Moonies and some Brand-X Indian public opinion outfit) just dumped a bunch of shitpolls for all 50 states.

It will be interesting to see what this does to Wang's numbers as Pennsylvania is heavily leveraged (a swath of recent, suspect close or Trump leaning polls) in the last week or so.

The one thing I like about Wang is that his methodology resists outliers. But sometimes you get a sequence of bad polls. It happens. It knocked my model off a few points. I'm hopeful his is more resistant.

(on edit: no I don't think it's real. It's just an interesting opportunity to test a hypothesis).

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Interesting to see what happens with Sam Wang's Princeton Election Consortium at the next update (Original Post) Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 OP
Is that why Nate Silver 538 model actually dipped a little? Farmgirl1961 Sep 2016 #1
Those polls aren't in the top 10 most weighted polls in his update Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #2
Only knocked it down 2 points Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #3

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
2. Those polls aren't in the top 10 most weighted polls in his update
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 04:48 PM
Sep 2016

so doubt it.

It's a C rated poll.

But frankly, I refuse to work with 538 numbers any more. See here.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Interesting to see what h...