Hillary Clinton Gets Gored (as in Al Gore)

[liberal N proud]

Americans of a certain age who follow politics and policy closely still have vivid memories of the 2000 election — bad memories, and not just because the man who lost the popular vote somehow ended up in office. For the campaign leading up to that end game was nightmarish too.

You see, one candidate, George W. Bush, was dishonest in a way that was unprecedented in U.S. politics. Most notably, he proposed big tax cuts for the rich while insisting, in raw denial of arithmetic, that they were targeted for the middle class. These campaign lies presaged what would happen during his administration — an administration that, let us not forget, took America to war on false pretenses.

Yet throughout the campaign most media coverage gave the impression that Mr. Bush was a bluff, straightforward guy, while portraying Al Gore — whose policy proposals added up, and whose critiques of the Bush plan were completely accurate — as slippery and dishonest. Mr. Gore’s mendacity was supposedly demonstrated by trivial anecdotes, none significant, some of them simply false. No, he never claimed to have invented the internet. But the image stuck.

And right now I and many others have the sick, sinking feeling that it’s happening again.

True, there aren’t many efforts to pretend that Donald Trump is a paragon of honesty. But it’s hard to escape the impression that he’s being graded on a curve. If he manages to read from a TelePrompter without going off script, he’s being presidential. If he seems to suggest that he wouldn’t round up all 11 million undocumented immigrants right away, he’s moving into the mainstream. And many of his multiple scandals, like what appear to be clear payoffs to state attorneys general to back off investigating Trump University, get remarkably little attention.

Meanwhile, we have the presumption that anything Hillary Clinton does must be corrupt, most spectacularly illustrated by the increasingly bizarre coverage of the Clinton Foundation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/05/opinion/hillary-clinton-gets-gored.html?WT.mc_id=2016-SEPT-FB-MidMC-AUD_DEV-0908&WT.mc_ev=click&ad-keywords=AUDDEVGate&_r=0
________________________________________________________________
This is about how the media and republicans have propped up their completely flawed candidate while taking down the qualified Democratic candidate.

And here’s a pro tip: the best ways to judge a candidate’s character are to look at what he or she has actually done, and what policies he or she is proposing. Mr. Trump’s record of bilking students, stiffing contractors and more is a good indicator of how he’d act as president; Mrs. Clinton’s speaking style and body language aren’t. George W. Bush’s policy lies gave me a much better handle on who he was than all the up-close-and-personal reporting of 2000, and the contrast between Mr. Trump’s policy incoherence and Mrs. Clinton’s carefulness speaks volumes today.

In other words, focus on the facts. America and the world can’t afford another election tipped by innuendo.

[Rezzi1945]

1. keep the faith

thats why hillary needs to be able to capitalize on the success of her first debate. we also need to help her with a great GOTV effort, as for what the other side wants to do however slick it is,we got no control of it.

[Demsrule86]

2. I fail to understand after we just had a great debate

why we have all these concern posts...I really don't. Hillary is not Gore. And the electoral map has changed significantly since 2000. It was 16 years ago. I really don't think posts like this are particularly helpful. What is your point? Is it we are doomed? We are going to win.