BREAKING: Trump Lawsuit Leaked Showing Women Fired For Being ‘Unattractive’ (DETAILS)

[riversedge]

As several others have asked--where was all this op research hiding during the primaries??



Bipartisan Report Verified account
?@Bipartisanism

BREAKING: Trump Lawsuit Leaked Showing Women Fired For Being ‘Unattractive’ (DETAILS) http://bipartisan.report/2016/09/29/breaking-trump-lawsuit-leaked-showing-women-fired-for-being-unattractive-details/ #strongerTogether


BREAKING: Trump Lawsuit Leaked Showing Women Fired For Being ‘Unattractive’ (DETAILS)


By Shanae Ewing -


September 29, 2016

There has been an issue being brought up lately concerning Donald Trump’s sexist ways in the past. There was a Super PAC ad showing women reading disparaging quotes Trump has actually said. Hillary Clinton released an attack ad and even brought up how horrible he was to former Miss Universe Alicia Machado during the presidential debate.

Now added to the list is a lawsuit filed by former employees at one of Trump’s golf courses. Included in the suit are statements that Trump wanted women fired for being unattractive and replaced with better looking women.


Not that anything was wrong with their work performance, he just didn’t want them there because they didn’t look good enough for him.

One of the employees was Haley Strozier, a former catering director at the golf course. In her declaration, she claimed she was ordered to fire women specifically because Trump didn’t find them attractive. One colleague Strozier claimed was “highly competent and professional” was order by the Vice President of the company to be fired because she was overweight. She said in her statement:

‘At some point in approximately 2003, Vincent Stellio — a vice president of our company — instructed me to fire Ms ***. Mr Stellio told me that I should do this because “Mr. Trump doesn’t like fat people” and he would not like seeing Ms *** when he was on the premises.’

She went on to say that .....................

[bettyellen]

1. I'm wondering if they saved it till the GOP went all in for Trump- puts them all in a tough spot.

[CincyDem]

5. I think they saved it for the "right time"

I think the reason they're called "October Surprises" is because most of the undecideds aren't engaged until then. Shooting something like this off in August or September engages the political literati but for most folks, it's to early for maximum effect.

Just my opinion. That republicans are all in now is probably an outcome of the same engagement schedule of undecideds.

[Thinkingabout]

8. many of the clips was available when he was running in the primary but he would blast those whom

He was running against they may have been afraid to bring them out. Now it is the GE and Democrats are not afraid of him.

[CincyDem]

2. Welcome to the big leagues Donald.

Now it's time to feel the heat of the spotlight that HRC has lived with (and constructively overcome) for 25+ years...on every single issue.

If you thought you could draw HRC's behavior from 20 years ago into the campaign and not have your 20 year history examined with a microscope...you'd have to be delusional. Oh...wait...maybe that's why you didn't see it coming.

[exboyfil]

4. Yes the trigger point

was asking Gennifer Flowers to the debate. That allowed the entire floodgate to open. His post debate remarks also added to that fuel.

[underpants]

7. A perfect post

Well done

[ffr]

3. Whoopsie! Did Donald do another bad thing today?

Drive dems to the polls! GOTV so we don't get straddled with this

[Thinkingabout]

6. Trump has made so many disparaging remarks over the years, he does not like

Ads coming out and he claims they are lies, they are actual footage of Trump saying the remarks. He can't stay out of his own way.

[leftynyc]

9. The other cons knew

They were weenies who didn't want to piss off his supporters. That's the ONLY reason they didn't use the stuff.