***Mason-Dixon FL Poll Clinton 46, Trump 42***

[piechartking]

Just saw on MSNBC - will post more info later. All Post-Debate.

[Loki Liesmith]

1. That's great

Mason Dixon often does not find good results for Democrats.

[Mamajami]

2. Absurd that he is even that close. I think some people are lying for fun.

[Lochloosa]

3. And this would be before the Cuba revelations.

[Democat]

4. Hopefully Rubio's response to the Cuba issue will hurt Trump

Unless Trump pays off Rubio to come over to his side.

[geek tragedy]

5. good to have a lead, but M/D is a horrible, no-good, pathetic crap polling firm

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/10/which-polls-fared-best-and-worst-in-the-2012-presidential-race/?_r=0

Worse than ARG and Rasmussen, barely better than Gallup.

[M_Demo_M]

6. Silver gives them a B+ rating with a slight R lean

So I'd say this is a solid result for Clinton.

FiveThirtyEight’s Pollster Ratings
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/

[geek tragedy]

7. thanks, not sure how they can be the worst in 2012 and rank amongst the best

for 2016, but I'm not a quant.

Anyhow, I hope they're 100% accurate here, because that's game/set/match.

[M_Demo_M]

8. I've given up on trying to figure out Silver's methodolgy

I'm just keeping an eye on his, Upshots, Sam Wang, and Predictwise's projections.

I really am curious which one will be most accurate on election day.

We'll see ...