Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ScienceIsGood

(314 posts)
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 10:42 AM Oct 2016

Does anyone think Chris Wallace will be fair on Wednesday?

After reading the article below in the Washington Post (which has been really hard on Trump this election) I am thinking maybe Wallace will be more fair than I would expect.

But anyone on FOX News is questionable to me.



Stop the nonsense about Chris Wallace’s alleged conflict of interest in moderating presidential debate

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2016/09/09/stop-the-nonsense-about-chris-wallaces-alleged-conflict-of-interest-in-moderating-presidential-debate/?utm_term=.499885fb488a

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does anyone think Chris Wallace will be fair on Wednesday? (Original Post) ScienceIsGood Oct 2016 OP
Don't hold your breath.... beachbum bob Oct 2016 #1
250K hibbing Oct 2016 #2
only on the amount over 250K, right? greymattermom Oct 2016 #5
Quite a bit, if they work OT. Ace Rothstein Oct 2016 #7
And teachers there make 100k? WOW. That's amazing! bettyellen Oct 2016 #17
Yes, it would only be on the amount over $250K TexasBushwhacker Oct 2016 #20
In Las Vegas, they can make 200-250k a year Nevernose Oct 2016 #45
? Taxes are based on income. Why should a firefighter or teacher not have to pay stopbush Oct 2016 #27
Turn it back on Trump SwankyXomb Oct 2016 #35
Honestly, no. -Steph- Oct 2016 #3
I'm sure Trump will love Fox's Chris Wallace..Hillary,not so much... workinclasszero Oct 2016 #4
Those debates were against other republicans Mellomugwump Oct 2016 #6
I don't think he is a big Trumpass fan....... Cakes488 Oct 2016 #8
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #9
No. Demsrule86 Oct 2016 #10
No he will give her a hard time just like all others at Fox News FloridaBlues Oct 2016 #11
I think he'll be ok. Imperialism Inc. Oct 2016 #12
I think he will be very rough on her, but unexpectedly hard on Trump too Fast Walker 52 Oct 2016 #13
No, and here's why... cynatnite Oct 2016 #14
WoW! That was some kind of awesome! Madam45for2923 Oct 2016 #37
wow! zenabby Oct 2016 #40
+1000 ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2016 #41
Wow, indeed. I wonder has he revenge stored up for that ? I realise he has interviewed HRC since but OnDoutside Oct 2016 #44
He's the best on Fox News. But he's still on Fox News. So I am a little nervous. StevieM Oct 2016 #15
Does anyone think Chris Wallace will be fair on Wednesday? LenaBaby61 Oct 2016 #16
No, Emails, Wikileaks, Clinton Foundation. wisteria Oct 2016 #18
So what? jberryhill Oct 2016 #51
Being tough on Trump during a primary debate a lot different geek tragedy Oct 2016 #19
Absolutely not! SharonClark Oct 2016 #21
I think he'll be tough on both, but LeftInTX Oct 2016 #22
yes. agreed. he'll be tough, sure, but even more so on her because he's got appearances to keep up. Divine Discontent Oct 2016 #24
I know this probably matters on the grand scale Blue Idaho Oct 2016 #23
He'll be so biased I'm not planning on watching this one. Sad the Commission picked a TeamPooka Oct 2016 #25
I have my doubts Gothmog Oct 2016 #26
Of course not, but this gives us a great opportunity. Trump will either have to admit it was a fair Attorney in Texas Oct 2016 #28
Wallace is... tgards79 Oct 2016 #29
So what? The Tingler Oct 2016 #52
"Mr. Trump you claim the Gang of Five is guilty to this day" SHRED Oct 2016 #30
fair enid602 Oct 2016 #31
I do. LisaM Oct 2016 #32
Next to the Streisand interview, Chris is Mike Wallace's greatest mistake. gordianot Oct 2016 #33
not going to watch... chillfactor Oct 2016 #34
Yes - he is an excellent interviewer - have seen him shred Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2016 #36
Not a snowballs chance in hell Submariner Oct 2016 #38
Never had been. One of the 99 Oct 2016 #39
Question? tavernier Oct 2016 #42
No. Absolutely not. He has already said he will not be ... Statistical Oct 2016 #43
Well, the talk the next day will be like the Pence lies were. Not a bad thing. n/t ScienceIsGood Oct 2016 #49
No chance budkin Oct 2016 #46
No. Wikileaks will the the most discussed subject and Lint Head Oct 2016 #47
If he cares about his party, he'll try to screw Trump. LeftRant Oct 2016 #48
It actually doesn't matter jberryhill Oct 2016 #50
And we know trump will be unprepared, try to pass off a few quips or sound bites, blame her for bettyellen Oct 2016 #55
Fair and Balanced. SamKnause Oct 2016 #53
Without Roger Ailes hovering over him, it's possible. Buns_of_Fire Oct 2016 #54
Yes, he will be fair...for only one reason.. Stuart G Oct 2016 #56

hibbing

(10,598 posts)
2. 250K
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 10:44 AM
Oct 2016

I'll be anxious to see if he asks how Hillary justifies raising taxes on a married firefighter and teacher because they make over 250K like he did in a previous debate.

Peace

Ace Rothstein

(3,373 posts)
7. Quite a bit, if they work OT.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 10:59 AM
Oct 2016

My brother is a firefighter in a Chicago suburb and makes about $125-150k, depending on how much OT he works in a given year.

TexasBushwhacker

(21,204 posts)
20. Yes, it would only be on the amount over $250K
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 12:56 PM
Oct 2016

And that's net income, after all the deductions and exemptions. I realize firefighters and teachers are public servants, but with the median household income under $60K, I can't cry big buckets of tears for any family pulling in 4 times that much. Teachers and firefighters have good retirement plans too, unlike most everyone else.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
45. In Las Vegas, they can make 200-250k a year
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 05:37 PM
Oct 2016

By gaming the sick leave system. There have been a few minor changes, but it is still possible to make substantially more than 100k a year. A battalion chief retired after 20 years with a 500k a year pension, something like five times his base salary. It all came to light during the bank crisis, when Nevada and Clark County were hit especially hard and we didn't have the money to pay anyone.

stopbush

(24,808 posts)
27. ? Taxes are based on income. Why should a firefighter or teacher not have to pay
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 04:06 PM
Oct 2016

taxes if they make a lot of money? What, because they do a job that you feel is somehow better than other jobs, they get an exemption?

SwankyXomb

(2,030 posts)
35. Turn it back on Trump
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 04:35 PM
Oct 2016

"Not everyone can falsify a $900 million loss to justify not paying any taxes for over 20 years."

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
4. I'm sure Trump will love Fox's Chris Wallace..Hillary,not so much...
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 10:47 AM
Oct 2016
Debate Moderator Chris Wallace: Not My Job to Be ‘Truth Squad’ If Candidates Lie
by Josh Feldman | 4:04 pm, September 5th, 2016

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/debate-moderator-chris-wallace-not-my-job-to-be-truth-squad-if-candidates-lie/

Mellomugwump

(94 posts)
6. Those debates were against other republicans
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 10:51 AM
Oct 2016

Let's see if he'll keep it up in a debate against Hillary Clinton.

 

Cakes488

(874 posts)
8. I don't think he is a big Trumpass fan.......
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:04 AM
Oct 2016

I've tried to catch Chris Wallace's show whenever I can...he calls people out for bullshit often...including el supremo dirtbag

Response to ScienceIsGood (Original post)

Imperialism Inc.

(2,504 posts)
12. I think he'll be ok.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:27 AM
Oct 2016

He's like the only thing approaching a real journalist at FOX. I also doubt very much he'll be voting for Trump come November.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
14. No, and here's why...
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:41 AM
Oct 2016



Bill Clinton publicly kicked the shit out of Wallace and the RW lies he has pushed.

zenabby

(364 posts)
40. wow!
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 05:13 PM
Oct 2016

That was aggressive Bill Clinton.

But now way can Hillary pull that off - the nation is okay with a man doing this, but NEVER a woman. she would have to handle it much much softer.

OnDoutside

(20,868 posts)
44. Wow, indeed. I wonder has he revenge stored up for that ? I realise he has interviewed HRC since but
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 05:37 PM
Oct 2016

this is a biggie.

StevieM

(10,578 posts)
15. He's the best on Fox News. But he's still on Fox News. So I am a little nervous.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 12:38 PM
Oct 2016

I think Hillary has to be prepared to answer the questions about her emails more forcefully. Until now she has mainly tried to minimize the conversation.

She has the facts on her side, but the GOP has done a good job of distorting the facts. So Hillary made a decision to just limit the amount of dialogue about the subject. I think she should be more thorough this time.

 

wisteria

(19,581 posts)
18. No, Emails, Wikileaks, Clinton Foundation.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 12:49 PM
Oct 2016

Trump- how are you going to make America Great again. Spin! Trump wins this debate, so the press can talk about a horse race.

It will be ugly.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
51. So what?
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 06:37 PM
Oct 2016

Do you think she cannot handle those topics?

It is a certainty she is prepared to answer any question he would like to ask.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
19. Being tough on Trump during a primary debate a lot different
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 12:53 PM
Oct 2016

than during a general election debate.

LeftInTX

(34,295 posts)
22. I think he'll be tough on both, but
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 03:41 PM
Oct 2016

I don't think he'll bring up Trump's sexual harassment stuff, unless there are new significant revelations between now and the debate.

I think he will bring up Clinton's e-mail server and possibly the current Wikileaks contents of her campaign e-mails.

So, in some respects, he will be tougher on Clinton.



Divine Discontent

(21,057 posts)
24. yes. agreed. he'll be tough, sure, but even more so on her because he's got appearances to keep up.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 03:44 PM
Oct 2016

Blue Idaho

(5,500 posts)
23. I know this probably matters on the grand scale
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 03:42 PM
Oct 2016

But I'm done watching debates. I watched 1 and 2 - against my better judgement but I'm done now. After watching Trump disqualify himself for the job of leader of the free world, I have nothing left to learn.

 

TeamPooka

(25,577 posts)
25. He'll be so biased I'm not planning on watching this one. Sad the Commission picked a
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 03:58 PM
Oct 2016

moderator that has such a long history of proven bias and lies against Hillary (and Bill) Clinton.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
28. Of course not, but this gives us a great opportunity. Trump will either have to admit it was a fair
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 04:09 PM
Oct 2016

debate (which he'll lose) or declare war against FoxNews (again) less than three weeks before the election.

It's a win-win.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
30. "Mr. Trump you claim the Gang of Five is guilty to this day"
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 04:12 PM
Oct 2016

"What are you basing this on considering the DNA evidence to the contrary?"

I want that asked.

enid602

(9,686 posts)
31. fair
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 04:17 PM
Oct 2016

Wallace is about as likely to come off as 'fair' as tRump is to come off as 'balanced.'

LisaM

(29,634 posts)
32. I do.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 04:21 PM
Oct 2016

His own reputation (such as it is) is at stake and I assume he has some respect for his female co-workers. I just hope he hears his father's voice whispering in his ear.

chillfactor

(7,694 posts)
34. not going to watch...
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 04:30 PM
Oct 2016

I will come to DU instead and read the posts thereby saving damage to my TV.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
36. Yes - he is an excellent interviewer - have seen him shred
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 04:37 PM
Oct 2016

Repukes. But, Hillary will be shredded too

Submariner

(13,365 posts)
38. Not a snowballs chance in hell
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 05:02 PM
Oct 2016

Instead of questioning about climate change, the economy, and issues that affect the middle class, that little maggot will bring up the Clinton Foundation in a scurrilous way, and of course, Benghazi.

If not for his Dad, the late Mike Wallace, Chris would be the Fry-o-lator manager at McDonalds in the middle of east bumf*ck Iowa somewhere. He's an incompetent Fox tool.

Statistical

(19,264 posts)
43. No. Absolutely not. He has already said he will not be ...
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 05:36 PM
Oct 2016

fact checking. Which means Drumf gets a national stage to bloviate any lies or utter nonsense he wants. Wallace's idea of fair is each side gets to stay stuff regardless of if that stuff if truthful or even resembles reality.

So if Drumf gets to rant off any nonsense attacks he wants and pass them off as facts. Can Wallace claim the high ground and say the debate is "fair" just because he wasn't directly biased for Drumf? I think not.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/10/14/now-more-ever-chris-wallace-wrong-person-moderate-final-debate/213834

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
47. No. Wikileaks will the the most discussed subject and
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 06:00 PM
Oct 2016

Chris Wallace will say that the groping isdue has been done to death.

LeftRant

(524 posts)
48. If he cares about his party, he'll try to screw Trump.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 06:00 PM
Oct 2016

It's obvious to anyone with critical thinking capacity that he will be a total disaster over an entire 4 years.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
50. It actually doesn't matter
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 06:36 PM
Oct 2016

There is nothing which she will not be able to address clearly and competently.

It really doesn't matter if the moderator is "fair".

Was anyone "fair" when she was required to testify for 11 hours? No. How did she do? Fine.
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
55. And we know trump will be unprepared, try to pass off a few quips or sound bites, blame her for
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 07:35 PM
Oct 2016

Everything bad including the fire bomb this weekend.
And he will not answer what is asked - but she will have great judgement whether to respond or not. He will look like a crazy ass again.

SamKnause

(14,896 posts)
53. Fair and Balanced.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 06:59 PM
Oct 2016

What a joke.

The facts are the facts.

In the world of Republicans, lies are facts.

This country can not have 2 sets of facts.

Fuck fair and balanced.

I want the truth !!!!!!!!!!

Buns_of_Fire

(19,161 posts)
54. Without Roger Ailes hovering over him, it's possible.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 07:29 PM
Oct 2016

But I won't be betting any large amounts of money on it.

Stuart G

(38,726 posts)
56. Yes, he will be fair...for only one reason..
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 08:09 PM
Oct 2016

This is a very important debate and event.

Chris Wallace really has a moment to show something very important..
His name is Wallace, and his father was quite good at this....
And no matter who Chris works for, my guess that is what will motivate him..
In a moment of prime importance, he can live up to his dad...

We will see in 3 days.....thanks for reading this...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Does anyone think Chris W...