2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumJezebel’s Jessica Coen defends ratting out racist teens: They need to learn
Jezebel editor-in-chief Jessica Coen on Sunday defended publicizing the racist tweets of some minors following President Barack Obamas re-election, saying the story highlighted hateful speech in America.
We were just doing a search for Barack Obama and taking a look at the Twitter reaction, and we saw some unfortunate things, and then we started doing searches for racial slurs, she told CNNs Howard Kurtz. And so many tweets came up, it was shocking well, maybe not shocking but upsetting, certainly.
Raw Story (http://s.tt/1uKKc)
DCKit
(18,541 posts)Since I'm not a twit, I was glad to have them brought to my attention.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)If you're going to say it, you have to own it.
I use my real name on Twitter.
lbrtbell
(2,389 posts)The internet is too dangerous a place to be using your real name. It's too easy for a determined person to learn where you live, and put you in grave danger.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Even then what the little asses said were public. I won't bother reading the article because the garbage tweets will only piss me off and make me tweet shit back at them.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)the racist teens have equally racist parents.
Caroline-Vivienne
(117 posts)She's putting a spotlight on what already exists in the public domain.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)But since it's usually used by thieving rats and mobsters, that's what I thought of the people supposedly trying to put her on the defensive.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)send-up of Youtube comments.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)Many of the racist messages were tweeted by minors. In a follow-up article, the publication said it had contacted the minors schools so that officials could teach them about racial sensitivity.
It is not the job of any journalist to try to teach anyone a lesson. Yes, these kids were insensitive, but most teen agers are not the soul of sensitivity. I don't know whether they actually meant what they wrote, but guess what? They had a right to say it. The same as when they tweet sexist or even homophobic messages. I may not agree with them, but neither would I have started a crusade against these kids.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)The backlash came from real people who went "Holy shit, that isn't right."
LisaL
(44,974 posts)Beacool
(30,253 posts)She crossed the line when she contacted these kids' schools. That was not her job. Then again, most self appointed "journalists" on blogs are not reporters. IMO what she did is unethical.
wowimthere
(1,472 posts)against a sitting President.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)These kids were talking trash, but the article doesn't mention them threatening the president. I believe in free speech, even when I don't agree with what is being said.
We can't have it both ways.
malthaussen
(17,219 posts)I don't much like the implicit message "watch what you say, or you'll get in trouble."
-- Mal
Beacool
(30,253 posts)What the reporter did makes me nervous. Because she found what they wrote offensive, she sought retribution by alerting their schools. Kids say plenty of stupid things, most of the time they don't even mean them. The lesson that they'll learn is that in the future they will keep their mouth shut, but it won't stop their minds from thinking it.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)and what are your credentials that you get to determine what journos can or cannot do?
Beacool
(30,253 posts)vilify
(102 posts)Beacool
(30,253 posts)She violated their right to free speech, not the other way around.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Racists are cowards, they hide their membership lists for their clubs like the kkk,jbs and hood their faces. I wish Anon. whould hack/publish those membership lists in public for some suprises.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)You may have a right to spout bigoted garbage, but that does not protect you from private citizens from calling you out on it.
malthaussen
(17,219 posts)You think bigots should be "publicly humiliated." So, what form of humiliation is reasonable? For speaking or writing words (words, only, we're not talking about other actions in this thread), what penalty is acceptable? Shall we reintroduce the stocks? Nail collars to the sides of churches and put the bad children in them when they say stupid things? Why not jail time? Why not, for that matter, execution, since obviously bigotry is an undesireable trait in our society and those who express it can be of no value that will offset the insult.
This is one of those cases when I think it is the business of the family and intimate acquaintances of the offender to correct him, and not the business of government. The problem of liberty being attended by inconveniences will not be solved by restraining liberty.
-- Mal
Chan790
(20,176 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem_witch_trials#Overview
Renew Deal
(81,885 posts)I love their sense of humor. They were correct to put these racists on display.