2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat the Early Vote in North Carolina Means: A Daily Tracker
Trump's campaign was just on MSNBC giving early voting numbers as I was reading this article. Needles to say, he was lying his ass off.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/north-carolina-early-vote-tracker.html?mc=aud_dev&mcid=tw-nytimes&mccr=NovemberTweetPromotion&mcdt=2016-10&subid=NovemberTweetPromotion&ad-keywords=AudDevGate&_r=0
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)jimlup
(7,968 posts)and his HRC vote is safely in the bank.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)and she continues to do well in Colorado (with 1/3 of that voting in)
Here's the battleground toss-ups
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/2016_elections_electoral_college_map.html
Ohio (18)
Florida (29)
North Carolina (15)
Nevada (6)
Iowa (6)
Arizona (11)
Georgia (16)
Colorado (9)
Maine CD2 (1)
Here's the map moving CO, NV & NC to Hillary due to strong early voting:
In that scenario, Trump can win the rest of the battleground tossup states AND Pennsylvania and would still lose.
vdogg
(1,384 posts)I gotta call BS on that one.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)It has gone back and forth some. But I added it and mentioned it separately as a margin of error.
All I'm saying is if Hillary continues to do well in early voting, she could be in a very secure position before Nov 8th
Wounded Bear
(58,726 posts)quoting bogus poll numbers and claiming "leads" in states where we know the polling says nothing of the sort.
They're back in fantasy/bullshit mode again.
They need much better internal polling. The same thing happened in '12, when they all claimed to be leading.