Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBush's 2004 election mandate
Bush's winning margin was way less in the electoral college and 2% less in the popular vote than Obama's margins, but somehow Repugs and the media called that a mandate. ButObama's win is not; his was a squeaker.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bush's 2004 election mandate (Original Post)
Proud liberal 80
Dec 2012
OP
Obama has a good chance to be the first President winning at least 51% of the vote for 2 terms
aaaaaa5a
Dec 2012
#2
Of course to the Rs there is no mandate; he is a democrat and black -- enough said. Why
Filibuster Harry
Dec 2012
#3
AnnaLee
(1,364 posts)1. I'm not so sure politics is supposed to make sense. nm.
aaaaaa5a
(4,686 posts)2. Obama has a good chance to be the first President winning at least 51% of the vote for 2 terms
since Dwight Eisenhower!
Not Reagan
Not Nixon
Not Bush
Not Clinton
Not Truman
LBj, Kennedy, Carter and Bush Sr. were one term Presidents.
Ike and Obama are the only 2 Presidents since WW2 to obtain this achievement.
It that's not a mandate for an agenda, I don't know what is.
In modern Presidential politics it literally is impossible to do any better. If this record doesn't give a President a mandate, then the only conclusion one could reach is that it is impossible for any President to have a mandate to govern based on election results.
Filibuster Harry
(666 posts)3. Of course to the Rs there is no mandate; he is a democrat and black -- enough said. Why
should anybody be surprised by the R comments? Who really believes that the R party is all about fairness?
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)4. Bush 2004 almost 3 million votes
Obama 2012 almost 5 million votes. Might be more when all votes are counted.
NewJeffCT
(56,848 posts)5. That's "playing politics"
Bush would have claimed a mandate if won by more than 1 vote.
And, Republicans would have denied Obama had a mandate even if Democrats won the House by 20 seats and Obama won by popular vote by 60%-40%