2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum#ManyPeopleAreSaying that Jesus' tomb was found
an unbelievable irresponsible New York Times reports that the tomb of Jesus may have been found because some people believe it's Jesus' tomb.
And if there are no bones in there, you can't say this story is BS because a book says Jesus rose to the sky.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/04/world/middleeast/jesus-tomb-opened-jerusalem-constantine.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
TheBlackAdder
(28,292 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The elaborate stuff was built up over the centuries which have passed since the locals found out they could make good money selling "pieces of the cross", other relics, and charging admission to see a cave.
TheBlackAdder
(28,292 posts).
This is even before the medieval and later scam idol sales.
.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...suggesting that there was some elaborate 1st century tomb at the site.
Hey, if you come to Delaware, for five bucks I'll take you to the tree that George Washington peed on.
TheBlackAdder
(28,292 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)That's why we charge them five bucks to get across the bridge.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC!
NG is now owned by Rupert Murdoch. It will be hard to tell the religious propaganda from the legitimate articles...
BSdetect
(9,002 posts)That is one scunner of a human.
Why would he need a tomb...if he ascended into heaven? I'm confused...
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)It was likely built after Romans deported the entire Jewish population following the Jewish revolt in 70 CE and 135 CE, when they built Aelia Capitolina. Emperor Constantine had it demolished around 325 CE, and his mother built the Chruch of the Holy Sepulcher there, claiming it to be the traditional site of the tomb. Claiming it is just discovered is either historical revision, flagrant ignorance, or just a lie.
sofa king
(10,857 posts)... And claiming that evidence has been found of a Mayan Civilzation in South Carolina.
Stuckinthebush
(10,847 posts)This wins!
Panich52
(5,829 posts)Admittedly, I didn't read article so I don't know if this is same "Jesus" tomb found earlier. Proof is highly unlikely, impossible in my view.
mainer
(12,041 posts)Detailed in a film by archaeologist Simcha Jacobovici. I've followed the investigation in some detail, as well as the controversy surrounding it.
The film created an uproar of controversy because it was an untouched family tomb that contained ossuaries engraved with the names:
Judah, son of Jesus
Mary
Jesus, son of Joseph
Matthew
Joseph
and a woman's name: "Mariamne, also called Master"
The archaeologist who first excavated it (now dead) was so shaken by the discovery that he told his wife this was an earth shattering find. Indeed, if Jesus had a son and was married to Mary Magdalene, then it turns Christianity upside down and elevates Mary Magdalene to someone far more respected.
http://www.jesusfamilytomb.com/essential_facts/ossuary_inscriptions.html
Panich52
(5,829 posts)Christian hierarchy will need another millennia before they admit Jesus might have had kids, still don't accept possibility of marriage.
yortsed snacilbuper
(7,945 posts)and that ain't no $hit!
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.