Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(57,780 posts)
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 02:45 PM Nov 2016

Why is it verboten to criticize GE voters

but acceptable to criticize Democratic Primary voters for failing to vote for the person who lost by 3.8 million votes?

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is it verboten to criticize GE voters (Original Post) BainsBane Nov 2016 OP
Beats the hell out of me. greatauntoftriplets Nov 2016 #1
Because we're not allowed to criticize DemonGoddess Nov 2016 #2
Ding! Starry Messenger Nov 2016 #3
little feefees to match WhiteTara Nov 2016 #4
Joy-Ann Reid has somethin' to say: yallerdawg Nov 2016 #5
Joy-Ann Reid speaks the truth Hekate Nov 2016 #7
She's good that way. BainsBane Nov 2016 #8
The lady knows what she's talking about... bettyellen Nov 2016 #10
how was the AA turnout for Hillary as compared to 2012? Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #16
Will we ever really know? yallerdawg Nov 2016 #17
well, actually, I think there's some data in that regard. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #18
The same organization that told us this was a cake walk for Hillary... yallerdawg Nov 2016 #19
You mean CNN? They're citing exit polling. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #20
Polling. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #21
exit polling is distinguishable from pre-election polling, to be sure. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #22
We don't know what the turnout was! yallerdawg Nov 2016 #23
And I could be a head in a jar, dreaming all of this. Of course. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #25
Well, I'd have had some Hillary stuff LisaM Nov 2016 #26
I live in Alabama. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #28
Okay. If you say so. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #31
Right and I suppose the way Bernie bashed her and the Democratic Party for months... Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #29
Her negatives came baked in. Sanders didn't do that. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #32
He did increased them and caused division. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #35
Some people take the position that Hillary was just a bad candidate. boston bean Nov 2016 #36
All we needed to do was to run a self-described socialist. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #37
Comparing AA turnout in 2016 to 2004 mght be more accurate. Kaleva Nov 2016 #42
Zingo! so true... they got some high standards they just don't hold themselves to them. boston bean Nov 2016 #6
VOLUME!! NurseJackie Nov 2016 #9
Not verboten kenfrequed Nov 2016 #11
Yet somehow not for all the people saying BainsBane Nov 2016 #12
Well... kenfrequed Nov 2016 #13
It wouldn't have mattered. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #30
Blame is all you have kenfrequed Nov 2016 #33
No we also have one of the most evil president-elects Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #34
A ridiculous argument. kenfrequed Nov 2016 #38
I don't think you understand...Bernie being in the primary helped Trump win. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #40
Again... absurd kenfrequed Nov 2016 #41
Unlike a dozen threads telling us what we should have done? mcar Nov 2016 #15
1 OrwellwasRight Nov 2016 #39
Things that make you go hmmmm mcar Nov 2016 #14
"The people have spoken, the bastards." OnDoutside Nov 2016 #24
I never get why it is wrong to blame the voters treestar Nov 2016 #27

DemonGoddess

(5,127 posts)
2. Because we're not allowed to criticize
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 02:50 PM
Nov 2016

the I told you so'ers. It's not "polite" or some other such bullshit.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
5. Joy-Ann Reid has somethin' to say:
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 02:58 PM
Nov 2016
Even Bernie Sanders couldn’t rush fast enough to get on the Trump side of the line, declaring himself a member of the white working class (his and his wife’s three homes and high six-figure income aside) and cautioning Democrats—who belong to a party of which he is still not a member—to start focusing on these voters too. Sanders ran a campaign that echoed Trump’s in many ways; appealing to a majority white, populist audience that hated Hillary Clinton more than it disdained Republicans. A majority of Black Americans were unimpressed, which is why he didn’t become the nominee, and they should be unsurprised that he is dropping them faster than he and his supporters wrote off “the South” as insignificant during the primary campaign.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
17. Will we ever really know?
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 07:00 PM
Nov 2016

We got a real good idea from the primaries, though.

It could have been a lot worse...

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
18. well, actually, I think there's some data in that regard.
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 07:03 PM
Nov 2016
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/politics/clinton-votes-african-americans-latinos-women-white-voters/

(CNN)Hillary Clinton just couldn't hold onto the Obama coalition. And that proved to be a large part of her undoing.
African-American, Latino and younger voters failed to show up at the polls in sufficient numbers Tuesday to propel Clinton into the White House.

***

While she won the key demographic groups her campaign targeted, she underperformed President Obama across the board, even among women, according to exit poll data.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
19. The same organization that told us this was a cake walk for Hillary...
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 07:15 PM
Nov 2016

is now the reliable source for why she lost.

I guess there was never anything special about Obama - or Hillary.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
21. Polling.
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 07:52 PM
Nov 2016

They're citing polling - and this is NOW reliable?

Or just more 'confirmation bias'?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
22. exit polling is distinguishable from pre-election polling, to be sure.
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 07:57 PM
Nov 2016

Are you suggesting turnout wasn't down? CNN is lying, here?

I don't know, man, there's only so far down the conspiracy rabbit hole I'm willing to go.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
23. We don't know what the turnout was!
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 08:09 PM
Nov 2016

Christ, their still counting votes. They are finding issues.

How could the polling be so wrong, including exit polling November 8th?

But now - the same organizations who got it all wrong - are the "reliable" sources now?

How many people confidently blew off voting because the outcome was so certain?

Who was watching those rural locations where Trump blew the roof off the 2012 voting?

I want to see what shakes out - I want facts, not polling extrapolations.





Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
25. And I could be a head in a jar, dreaming all of this. Of course.
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 09:23 PM
Nov 2016

Still, even leaving aside distrust of the media and polls- understandable, to be sure- I will say my own perception of an enthusiasm gap? In 2008 and 2012 I saw scads of Obama bumperstickers in my very blue state. Tons.

I think I saw one Hillary sticker all year. That's an enthusiasm gap.

LisaM

(29,686 posts)
26. Well, I'd have had some Hillary stuff
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 09:26 PM
Nov 2016

except that I was afraid of vandalism or being yelled at, and I know I'm not alone in that. We park our car (we have a Club, after our other car got stolen) that is in a high prowl area, and strangely, a lot of the local car thief gangs have been Russian, and I don't have the time or money to deal with more vandalism.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
28. I live in Alabama.
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 09:35 PM
Nov 2016

I saw no bumper stickers or yard signs for either candidate here in Montgomery.

What does that tell us?

Alabama was never in question by either candidate. It has nothing to do with enthusiasm.

If bumper stickers and yard signs mattered, according to DU, Sanders would be president today!

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
31. Okay. If you say so.
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 11:50 PM
Nov 2016

I live in an extremely blue area. I saw a shitton of Obama stickers in '08 and '12. No Hillary. Does that mean anything? Maybe, maybe not.

One can discount it, certainly. Discounting the exit poll data takes a bit more effort.

Demsrule86

(71,555 posts)
29. Right and I suppose the way Bernie bashed her and the Democratic Party for months...
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 09:40 PM
Nov 2016

He didn't concede and pretty much drove her numbers down...Trump literally took words right out of Bernie's mouth. Now I don't think Bernie wanted this but he played a role in this loss.

boston bean

(36,962 posts)
36. Some people take the position that Hillary was just a bad candidate.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 11:01 AM
Nov 2016

They don't bother to worry about the fact that in many states where margin was close there the voting rights of hundreds of thousands were limited by republican governors and state legilatures.

And those most affected were minorities.

But hey, it makes them feel better to say Hillary was a bad candidate... WTFEver!

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
37. All we needed to do was to run a self-described socialist.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 11:42 AM
Nov 2016

America was ready!

We'll do better in 2018, 2020. It's looking good...

Kaleva

(40,436 posts)
42. Comparing AA turnout in 2016 to 2004 mght be more accurate.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 07:06 PM
Nov 2016

It's most likely Obama would generate higher then normal AA turnout.

Here are links to CNN's 2016 and 2004 exit poll data.

http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html

BainsBane

(57,780 posts)
12. Yet somehow not for all the people saying
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 06:09 PM
Nov 2016

I told you so. You should have voted for Bernie. Seems to me people ought to focus more on their own expension of energy than that of others. The election was only a week ago, the primary many months back.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
13. Well...
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 06:24 PM
Nov 2016

A bit of that was bound to happen really.

I left this place for awhile when mass-amnesty for those that behaved badly occurred (was it May or June) and I only returned recently after the elections were over.

There was a lot of negativity. No doubt had she won there would have been a fair amount of "see I told you so" in counter to whatever electability arguments people made (or reposted from TYT). But since she lost, a lot of Bernie supporters (myself included) are looking back and pointing out how maybe there was another way.

I think that might be a bit different than simply blaming all voters. But I could be wrong, maybe it is just an inverse to blaming voters.

One question I would consider asking of anyone:

Knowing then what you know now, would you have considered supporting another candidate in the primary?

I can tell you that if Bernie won the primary and lost the election I would have reluctantly backed Hill in the primary.

Demsrule86

(71,555 posts)
30. It wouldn't have mattered.
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 09:44 PM
Nov 2016

Here is my question...knowing what we now I wonder if Bernie would have gotten into the primary. There is little doubt in my mind had he not done so, we would have won. I don't think he would have.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
33. Blame is all you have
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 01:09 AM
Nov 2016

So rather than actually answer the question you decide to find another route to blame Bernie.

How original.

Demsrule86

(71,555 posts)
34. No we also have one of the most evil president-elects
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 10:57 AM
Nov 2016

in the history of this country...many warned during the primary that Bernie was doing irreparable harm to a Clinton general election. And we were correct. I do blame Bernie. Don't get me wrong...he was but one factor. However, it is my belief that if Bernie Sanders had not run in the primary Hillary would be president-elect.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
38. A ridiculous argument.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:06 PM
Nov 2016

A primary doesn't exist to completely insulate one particular candidate (mint in box) until the election. I don't think you seem to comprehend the arrogance encapsulated in that particular argument.

Demsrule86

(71,555 posts)
40. I don't think you understand...Bernie being in the primary helped Trump win.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 05:53 PM
Nov 2016

He should have known better

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
41. Again... absurd
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 06:34 PM
Nov 2016

A primary is a mechanism by which a party chooses it's candidate.

I want you to actually think about what you are saying. I want you to turn the calendar back to late spring of 2015. What is the measure by which a person should determine whether or not they should run to be the candidate of that party?


treestar

(82,383 posts)
27. I never get why it is wrong to blame the voters
Thu Nov 17, 2016, 09:31 PM
Nov 2016

The swing state voters are responsible for Dump because they voted for him. They voted him in those state, they caused him to win, they are to blame.

People who don't vote just don't care so they are to blame for nothing but their complaints of any kind would ring hollow.

People who vote third party surely realize that their vote only counts once, so they are to blame for contributing to the loss of any candidate more closely to their side. Especially when the opposition candidate is so bad that the country is in danger if the person wins.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why is it verboten to cri...