HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » UPDATE: Judge lets Clinto...

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 10:43 PM

UPDATE: Judge lets Clinton join recount lawsuit

I think she's actually fighting for transparency and not the Presidency.


A judge has allowed Hillary Clinton to join Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein's lawsuit seeking a hand recount in Wisconsin.

Dane County Circuit Judge Valerie Bailey-Rihn granted a request from Clinton's attorneys to join the lawsuit without comment during a hearing Tuesday afternoon. Clinton's team had argued she has a stake in the recount and manual counting is the most transparent method for the public.

Donald Trump beat Clinton by about 22,000 votes in Wisconsin. The recount will start Thursday if Stein or De La Fuente or both meet a Tuesday deadline to pay the $3.5 million cost.


http://www.wkow.com//story/33819198/2016/11/29/clinton-asks-to-join-lawsuit-demanding-hand-recount-in-wisconsin

Oh, and she has a signup page on her website:
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/signups/wi-recount-help/

17 replies, 3492 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 17 replies Author Time Post
Reply UPDATE: Judge lets Clinton join recount lawsuit (Original post)
JSup Nov 2016 OP
still_one Nov 2016 #1
JSup Nov 2016 #2
still_one Nov 2016 #4
womanofthehills Nov 2016 #3
triron Nov 2016 #5
KewlKat Nov 2016 #6
triron Nov 2016 #7
SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #9
MichMan Nov 2016 #8
SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #10
triron Nov 2016 #11
SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #12
synergie Nov 2016 #17
Gothmog Nov 2016 #13
triron Nov 2016 #14
musicblind Nov 2016 #15
Hekate Nov 2016 #16

Response to JSup (Original post)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 10:49 PM

1. I think you are right, but I also think she is recognizing all the hard work that her volunteers did

and showing her appreciation to them by joining this effort

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to still_one (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 10:51 PM

2. She still has our back...

...and now I'm sad all over again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JSup (Reply #2)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 10:53 PM

4. yes she does, and we are all heartsick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JSup (Original post)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 10:52 PM

3. Great News!! It's moving along!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to womanofthehills (Reply #3)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 10:54 PM

5. Yes!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JSup (Original post)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 10:59 PM

6. Now that WI is robbing the funds for their recount, will we need cash on hand to pay for PA and MI?

because the donors have really slowed down. We need 3 million more to cover the newest estimate.

What happens if tomorrow we don't have the money for MI?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KewlKat (Reply #6)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 11:19 PM

7. Stein raised the goal to 9.5 million.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KewlKat (Reply #6)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 11:27 PM

9. MI would be about 1 million

and it's a fixed fee.

Stein has pulled in $6.5 million, and we know for sure that she's spent $3.5 million, leaving $3 million. A high end estimate for PA filing fees would be $150,000, based on 3000 affidavits at $50/each. I doubt she had 3000 petitions, and not all precincts were charging, so that number is probably high, so that leaves $2.85 million.

So, unless she's spent $2.25 million on legal fees, she should have plenty to file in Michigan.

Where she might have problems later is if the Wisconsin recount comes in at higher than estimated...if she's already spent the money in the account, she's going to come up short.


edited to update number for MI recount

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JSup (Original post)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 11:23 PM

8. Stein should reimburse Michigan for the entire amount

Taxpayers could be on the hook for close to $1 million — or more — for a proposed recount of Michigan's presidential election results, Secretary of State Ruth Johnson said Tuesday.

Green Party candidate Jill Stein, who took just more than 1% of the presidential vote in the Nov. 8 election, has announced she will request a statewide recount by Wednesday's deadline as a check against possible counting mistakes or fraud.

Stein is being charged $125 per precinct, a cost originally estimated at $787,500 in total.
But Michigan Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday the actual cost charged to Stein could be around $900,000, based on the final size of the recount and the addition of absentee ballot precincts. Any cost beyond the $125 per precinct would be borne by taxpayers at the county level, he said.

Stein's campaign said in a Tuesday news release it expects to pay a Michigan filing fee of $973,250.

But Tuesday, appearing on the "Paul W. Smith Show" on WJR-AM (760), Johnson estimated the cost will be double what Thomas estimated.


http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/11/29/secretary-state-says-recount-cost-could-near-2m/94612906/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MichMan (Reply #8)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 11:29 PM

10. Yeah, but she won't

She's not paying the full cost for PA either.

Other states need to look at how Wisconsin does it...charge the true amount, and get it up front.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JSup (Original post)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 11:45 PM

11. Maybe Clinton camp onto something?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to SickOfTheOnePct (Reply #12)

Wed Nov 30, 2016, 03:20 AM

17. Judge is leaving it up to the counties, find the numbers of the county clerks and express

 

yourself as to why a hand count is the necessary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JSup (Original post)

Wed Nov 30, 2016, 12:16 AM

13. As an election law junkie, this will be fun to watch

Marc Elias is a great attorney

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JSup (Original post)

Wed Nov 30, 2016, 01:28 AM

14. knr

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JSup (Original post)

Wed Nov 30, 2016, 01:33 AM

15. She is a great woman.

Despite her flaws, and we all have flaws, she is someone I would have been proud to have as my president. She cares about us.

Now I'm sad again

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JSup (Original post)

Wed Nov 30, 2016, 01:42 AM

16. Good!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread