Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jerseyjack

(1,361 posts)
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 08:47 AM Dec 2012

Fucked over by Obama -- twice in two days

Yesterday was his caving in on Social Security.

Today, $250,000, well its not too much money after all.

What will tomorrow bring?

81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fucked over by Obama -- twice in two days (Original Post) jerseyjack Dec 2012 OP
Tomorrow he will declare war on puppies BeyondGeography Dec 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Dec 2012 #2
it is called negotiations and compromise.... chillfactor Dec 2012 #3
No they haven't. One of the 99 Dec 2012 #5
Yeah I heard of it so you cut my social security and not defense daa Dec 2012 #6
No it's called ignoring the American people and promoting the Republican party AnnaLee Dec 2012 #7
It's neither negotiation nor compromise when... TheMadMonk Dec 2012 #11
I don't think he expects them to meet him even half way. Texin Dec 2012 #49
They won't compromise at all. And why should they... TheMadMonk Dec 2012 #65
You keep using those words. Jakes Progress Dec 2012 #13
"Negotiations" and "compromise" Myrina Dec 2012 #17
It's called selling out the people who voted for him pscot Dec 2012 #20
Exactly!! center rising Dec 2012 #25
And do so with the support of Democratic politicians who should be supporting us. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #78
Cutting social security to preserve small tax cuts for $200k-$400k families high density Dec 2012 #64
I am hoping this is just making the GOPhers tea baggers look bad. kooljerk666 Dec 2012 #4
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #18
"He don't represent me"?? "rubs it into people that voted for him faces"?? Zoeisright Dec 2012 #21
Agree with your first sentence. Texin Dec 2012 #51
Tomorrow will bring all the spin and the apologists in full force... vi5 Dec 2012 #8
Careful. That cliff you want to jump off of is mighty close. lunatica Dec 2012 #10
They've been preparing their excuses for weeks. Jakes Progress Dec 2012 #14
No ponies for you lunatica Dec 2012 #9
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #12
You have been a member since December 16th. Jennicut Dec 2012 #15
May be you should have been organizing instead of betting. Obama lost Missouri. bluestate10 Dec 2012 #39
Lier to the "Democrat" people? Jeff In Milwaukee Dec 2012 #56
Next up: Rise in Medicare age. If he says he's against something, that means he wants it. forestpath Dec 2012 #16
The White House doesn't have to keep up the pretense any longer. blkmusclmachine Dec 2012 #19
+1 daa Dec 2012 #58
x2. Why should he or other Third-Way Democrats care? AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #80
The President is getting the best deal he can for ALL the people appacom Dec 2012 #22
Social Security does not add to the deficit... KansDem Dec 2012 #26
Social Security has zero to do with the deficit. Obama said so himself. MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #30
I tried signing but this message keeps popping up KansDem Dec 2012 #33
I guess their mind is made up and they don't want our input MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #35
Welcome to DU. In general here on DU, few people want SS touched. bluestate10 Dec 2012 #40
Another set of rumors from anonymous sources? n/t gkhouston Dec 2012 #23
and another "the sky is falling" bullshit thread promoting them CatWoman Dec 2012 #24
+1000000 Hoyt Dec 2012 #27
Yep jberryhill Dec 2012 #32
I don't get some DUers. They have the match lit, ready, and held close to their hair BlueCaliDem Dec 2012 #31
I use to argue with them. Now I just mostly ignore them. They are a vocal minority but a minority. phleshdef Dec 2012 #36
Once a Nader Florida 2000 type mind, always a Nader Florida 2000 type mind. bluestate10 Dec 2012 #41
Nothing new. Some here criticize the MSM (rightfully), but yet NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #45
These "sources" aren't so anonymous anymore. We know exactly who they are.... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #38
Now, Now. Those same people that got 0.03% of the vote are sure they can take a third bluestate10 Dec 2012 #42
They're delusional, and despite their best attempts, they've failed to spread the..... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #54
why do you wanty grammy eatin cat food! damn you, them' fightin woids!1!1 put em up!111! dionysus Dec 2012 #75
Not only that, but when their dire predictions don't come true (as usual), they can claim they made Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #81
I would like to see the larger deal in context JuveDem Dec 2012 #28
Don't like it? SIGN THE PETITION! MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #29
I remember Clinton talking about how they balanced WhoWoodaKnew Dec 2012 #34
As I recall. no republicans voted for the tax increases and they wilsonbooks Dec 2012 #68
I always favored a limit of $400,000. If a family lives in the Northeast, $250,000 is bluestate10 Dec 2012 #37
That family will get tax break on up to $250,000 of NET income after their julian09 Dec 2012 #57
A sky is falling post on DU -- thousands of times in 1,428 days. NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #43
And Obama did it again. grantcart Dec 2012 #46
Remember when Kucinich announced he was voting for the HCR bill? NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #50
That's right. It never will. cliffordu Dec 2012 #60
This deal will never happen rusty fender Dec 2012 #44
your right in a way. It will happen but it cannot happen until the stock market loses 20% of its grantcart Dec 2012 #47
Nope. The Bush tax cuts will expire, the automatic rusty fender Dec 2012 #53
They won't accept a deal but it will come one piece at a time. grantcart Dec 2012 #72
Flinging trollshit doesn't become you. MjolnirTime Dec 2012 #48
I agree. Obama is a traitor to working class Americans. limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #52
This is political brinksmanship.... Jeff In Milwaukee Dec 2012 #55
Totally right NHDEMFORLIFE Dec 2012 #59
You may be looking for: Jeff In Milwaukee Dec 2012 #63
^This budkin Dec 2012 #61
Maybe ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2012 #71
Fucked over by Nancy Pelosi too: forestpath Dec 2012 #62
I think you are fucking yourself over with your post. RBInMaine Dec 2012 #66
More crap from the TeaLEFTists. We got screwed over in 2010 by the TeaLeftists who bitched and RBInMaine Dec 2012 #67
+1 FSogol Dec 2012 #69
Another bullshit AP story? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2012 #70
I will wait until Obama releases his official statements about the 'deal'. Sunlei Dec 2012 #73
Trashing thread... Liberal_Stalwart71 Dec 2012 #74
Really? winetourdriver Dec 2012 #76
Call your damn US Representative and US Senators about it? LiberalFighter Dec 2012 #77
Can You Provide A Link To Where Obama Is Cutting Soc. Security? Yavin4 Dec 2012 #79

Response to jerseyjack (Original post)

One of the 99

(2,280 posts)
5. No they haven't.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 09:22 AM
Dec 2012

It's called making the perfect the enemy of the good. And those who engage in that kind of thinking will quickly make themselves irrelevant.

daa

(2,621 posts)
6. Yeah I heard of it so you cut my social security and not defense
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 09:27 AM
Dec 2012

I DID NOT SUPPORT DEMOCRATS ACROSS THE COUNTRY FOR THIS!!! Nor will I in the future.

AnnaLee

(1,391 posts)
7. No it's called ignoring the American people and promoting the Republican party
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 09:31 AM
Dec 2012

The American people voted for increases for earners over $200K. Now we have a trickle up plan where retirees send money to people in the $200K-$400K earnings. It's a lot of money when you compare the number of people between $200K-$400K to the number above $400K. The cuts to the poor and middle class have just begun.

I don't know if I don't see this mentioned because it is obvious or if people haven't stopped and thought about it:

If a poor retiree substitutes ground beef for steak this year then it will be chicken (if cheaper than ground beef) for ground beef next year and so on. At some point there is nothing left to substitute. The index is a one year substitution calculation and not a compounding over multiple years calculation. As such, it is bogus when used as a COLA index. Also, since it has been shown that the components of the current CPI do not weight real costs to retirees (such as medical), even the current CPI is usually lower than the CPI experienced by elderly people.

It will be informative to see what the Democrats in Congress do about this. I have the impression that, thus far, they have either been left out of the conversation or have opted out.

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
11. It's neither negotiation nor compromise when...
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:05 AM
Dec 2012

...your starting position is your opponent's final demands.

That's not even capitulation. It's full blooded cooperation in the ongoing transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich.

Texin

(2,851 posts)
49. I don't think he expects them to meet him even half way.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:37 PM
Dec 2012

They won't compromise for that number any more than they will for the $250k that was the first demand. I don't believe they'll reach a deal before the end of the year, and we will go off the cliff.

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
65. They won't compromise at all. And why should they...
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 06:49 PM
Dec 2012

...They've learnt that they get every single thing they want by not asking for it, but simply by saying "No" and waiting until it's offered to them.

Jakes Progress

(11,213 posts)
13. You keep using those words.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:21 AM
Dec 2012

I don't think they mean what you think they mean.

We elected the six-fingered man.

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
17. "Negotiations" and "compromise"
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:27 AM
Dec 2012

.... do not equal giving away the farm to keep the bully rich, fat & happy at the expense of everyone else.

center rising

(971 posts)
25. Exactly!!
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:15 AM
Dec 2012

Obama can do this because he doesn't have to run for president again. Obama is going to cave in once again.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
78. And do so with the support of Democratic politicians who should be supporting us.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:59 PM
Dec 2012

Obama is not doing this alone.

high density

(13,397 posts)
64. Cutting social security to preserve small tax cuts for $200k-$400k families
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 06:40 PM
Dec 2012

is completely ridiculous and unacceptable.

 

kooljerk666

(776 posts)
4. I am hoping this is just making the GOPhers tea baggers look bad.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 09:02 AM
Dec 2012

Until next congress there is no way anything is gonna pass unless it is exactly what we just had.

As unpopular as GOP, and 65% of America is behind all potential DEM changes, I can't imagine Obama wanting to go down in history as a useless comprising whore of wall st, banksters & rich trash.

Hope springs eternal.

BTW I am not a huge Obama fan but I think he may be stepping to the left.

Response to kooljerk666 (Reply #4)

Zoeisright

(8,339 posts)
21. "He don't represent me"?? "rubs it into people that voted for him faces"??
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:39 AM
Dec 2012

Wow, you are really ignorant.

Texin

(2,851 posts)
51. Agree with your first sentence.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:44 PM
Dec 2012

They won't go for that amount any more than Obama would cave into letting the Daddy Warbuckses keep all their tax breaks. The current crop of Neanderthals in in the rethug party won't go along with Boner's compromise either. Let the negotiating end now. I'm thinking that the $500k offer is a no-go and Obama knows it. When the new Dems are sworn in in January, there will be more of them in both houses and maybe they'll have more leverage to make something happen. I'm also thinking that Obama isn't of the belief that the half-way compromise (which also puts SS and MC on the table) will be a no-go zone for most/all Dem legislators. There's no way Pelosi is gonna let that happen.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
8. Tomorrow will bring all the spin and the apologists in full force...
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 09:40 AM
Dec 2012

"You don't understand negotiation/compromise!!!"
"It was the best we could do!!!!!! You should be thanking President Obama!!!!"
"He didn't have a choice!!!!!!"
"It's really a victory for our side!!!!!!! If you squint really hard, and look through this fogged up pair of glasses and tilt your head sideways then you'll see how clear it is that we really won and Obama's 12 level chess won the day again!!!!"

And no matter how many posts you can pull out from the archives showing that some of us predicted this level of caving and they all denied it would ever happen, they will never ever admit they were wrong.

Response to jerseyjack (Original post)

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
15. You have been a member since December 16th.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:25 AM
Dec 2012

If you bet on anything, none of us knew about it.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
39. May be you should have been organizing instead of betting. Obama lost Missouri.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:58 AM
Dec 2012

Obama won my state by close to 40 points. I take a wait and see position on what is in the agreement. I am one that feel that changes to the SS COLA may not be bad if done correctly. I have real skin in the game because after the agreement, if as proposed, I expect to end up paying more in taxes while, in the future being impacted by the COLA change - I am ok with all of that because the country needs me to make those sacrifices.

 

forestpath

(3,102 posts)
16. Next up: Rise in Medicare age. If he says he's against something, that means he wants it.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:26 AM
Dec 2012
 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
19. The White House doesn't have to keep up the pretense any longer.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:38 AM
Dec 2012
2014 is gonna be a massacre.

appacom

(296 posts)
22. The President is getting the best deal he can for ALL the people
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:54 AM
Dec 2012

so get the fuck off him. Did you really expect he wouldn't have to compromise on something?

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
26. Social Security does not add to the deficit...
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:22 AM
Dec 2012

So why include it in the GOP's deficit reduction plans?

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
33. I tried signing but this message keeps popping up
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:42 AM
Dec 2012
We were unable to return you to whitehouse.gov.

Internet Explorer has stopped trying to restore this website. It appears that the website continues to have a problem.
What you can do:
Go to your home page

Try to return to whitehouse.gov

More information


I tried twice and received the same message.
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
35. I guess their mind is made up and they don't want our input
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:50 AM
Dec 2012

Or maybe try a different browser?

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
40. Welcome to DU. In general here on DU, few people want SS touched.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:04 PM
Dec 2012

I am on the fence. I want the SS Cap eliminated, if that is in the plan, I am ok with adjustment to the SS COLA. If the SS Cap elimination is not in the plan, then I am less happy with the COLA adjustment unless it is done in a way that does not hurt people that collect SS. I benefit from the SS Cap being in place, but I also feel that the people benefiting from it can afford to lose it.

CatWoman

(80,288 posts)
24. and another "the sky is falling" bullshit thread promoting them
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:13 AM
Dec 2012

this place is soooo fucking predictable

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
31. I don't get some DUers. They have the match lit, ready, and held close to their hair
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:32 AM
Dec 2012

the moment some anonymous, off-the-record "source" farts a rumor. Then they set their hair on fire and go wailing into the cities and towns, too busy to vote, and when 2010 came around, decided they wanted to punish the president and not vote at all. That'll teach'em!

Result?

The Republicans happily took their petty scorn and ran with it, delivering the president a shellacking that swept a huge red wave across the nation, and then these same alarmists start wailing that the president doesn't get anything done in the last two years!

Jesus! If they want to know how the president governs, all they have to do is look at the past four years, noting the first two as the most progressive before they lit their hair on fire and sent the president the message that they wanted the Republican agenda more than the Democratic. Because that's what that "Republican shellacking" told everybody - the American people were opting for the destructive policies of the GOP and ALEC rather than the progressive policies of the Democrats. Of course, in their minds, they were punishing the president, but in the real world, they basically handed power to the GOP who is 100x worse than any Democrat. Did they learn? HELL NO. Here they are right back to lighting their hair.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
36. I use to argue with them. Now I just mostly ignore them. They are a vocal minority but a minority.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:50 AM
Dec 2012

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
41. Once a Nader Florida 2000 type mind, always a Nader Florida 2000 type mind.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:13 PM
Dec 2012

Some people don't fucking get it that by helping elect Bush in 2000 because they were "unhappy" with the democrat nominee, they set the fucking country back four decades economically and created the very fucking conditions that they are wailing about now. Not to mention thousands of dead americans and troops because Bush fucked up leading up to 9/11 and later, wanted revenge for daddy. The Nader 2000 crowd chased a fucking car tire in 2000 and screwed the country royally, they need to get the fuck over themselves and their "pure progressive values".

NYC Liberal

(20,453 posts)
45. Nothing new. Some here criticize the MSM (rightfully), but yet
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:24 PM
Dec 2012

they seem to lap up the MSM's bullshit with nary a though when it comes to anything that might making Obama look bad. And even when it's good news, it's never good enough. Obama does something "bad" they don't like, and he's called "traitor", "sell-out", "right-wing"...all the usual; however, when he does something good, his detractors often take credit because you see, he didn't really want to do it but he was "forced" to.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,454 posts)
38. These "sources" aren't so anonymous anymore. We know exactly who they are....
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:55 AM
Dec 2012

and we know exactly what they're up to. They lost, and they should get the fuck over it. They got 0.03% of the vote, which is an embarrassment in & of itself, but they can't seem to stop embarrassing themselves even further by coming up with every anti-Obama conspiracy theory under the sun. "Rumors" are their stock & trade. Afterall, what else do they have?

This is why I'm fearful of some groups on the left. They are as dangerous & sinister as the Glenn Becks who scare the crap out of people about "FEMA Camps". The sad part is, it's a handful of pissed off people who lost, and they're intent on destroying the Democratic Party, and especially this president.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
42. Now, Now. Those same people that got 0.03% of the vote are sure they can take a third
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:16 PM
Dec 2012

party and win the Presidency. Idiocy never ceases. May be Nader is 2016? I am sure some are salivating at the possibility.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,454 posts)
54. They're delusional, and despite their best attempts, they've failed to spread the.....
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 01:37 PM
Dec 2012

condition to the rank & file of the Democratic Party. It pisses them off. Their major goal, all along, seems to be the complete & utter destruction of this party. They hold democrats in higher contempt than their rightwing "counterparts". Both extremes have one goal in mind. They have a lot more in common than they care to admit.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
75. why do you wanty grammy eatin cat food! damn you, them' fightin woids!1!1 put em up!111!
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:31 PM
Dec 2012

Tarheel_Dem

(31,454 posts)
81. Not only that, but when their dire predictions don't come true (as usual), they can claim they made
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 06:51 PM
Dec 2012

the President back down, by typing angry screeds on the DU. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

JuveDem

(69 posts)
28. I would like to see the larger deal in context
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:24 AM
Dec 2012

If he is able to get everything he wants (debt ceiling, leaving SS, medicare, etc intact) and the compromise from his side is going from 250 to 400, then I am ok with it.

WhoWoodaKnew

(847 posts)
34. I remember Clinton talking about how they balanced
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:46 AM
Dec 2012

the budget. He said that first, he didn't hate republicans and were willing to talk with them. And most importantly, math.

wilsonbooks

(972 posts)
68. As I recall. no republicans voted for the tax increases and they
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 07:52 PM
Dec 2012

killed us in the midterm elections using the tax issue to club us down.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
37. I always favored a limit of $400,000. If a family lives in the Northeast, $250,000 is
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:50 AM
Dec 2012

not a lot of money if that family wants to live and have freedom on issues like education. I hear the argument that people in this region are living on a lot less, but life works that way. I care more that the $250,000 family is charitable within their capacity to give.

 

julian09

(1,435 posts)
57. That family will get tax break on up to $250,000 of NET income after their
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 03:29 PM
Dec 2012

mortgage deductions, property tax deductions, health ins deduction, dependency deductions including self ,charitable deduction
tax credits, tax prep etc. They will be asked to pay a additional 4.6 cents on the dollar or $2300.00 on $300,000 and an additional $4600.00 on $350,000 etc.
$4600.00 additional tax on every $100,000 earned after deductions and $250,000 threshold.
That would be and additional $11,500 tax on the second $250,000.

NYC Liberal

(20,453 posts)
43. A sky is falling post on DU -- thousands of times in 1,428 days.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:19 PM
Dec 2012

What will tomorrow bring?

More of the usual.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
46. And Obama did it again.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:26 PM
Dec 2012

Except he didn't and when the final deal comes in it always turns out that he got way more than was thought at the time.


Examples = Health Care he capped the Medical Loss Ratio and put the OPM in charge of vetting plans

Debt ceiling = brought the fiscal cliff with military cuts.

It would be novel for the panic brigade to actually wait for the facts but alas this is DU and that will not happen.

NYC Liberal

(20,453 posts)
50. Remember when Kucinich announced he was voting for the HCR bill?
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:39 PM
Dec 2012

Some posters actually suggested that Obama had threatened him and that he'd better "avoid small planes".

I think that said it all.

 

rusty fender

(3,428 posts)
44. This deal will never happen
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:24 PM
Dec 2012

The Rs in the House will accept NO deal. Lots of sturm und drang over nothing.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
47. your right in a way. It will happen but it cannot happen until the stock market loses 20% of its
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 12:28 PM
Dec 2012

value and then the rich Republicans will beat up the Tea Partiers.

Eventually they will split if they have to and vote with the Dems, but there will be a deal, just not yet.
 

rusty fender

(3,428 posts)
53. Nope. The Bush tax cuts will expire, the automatic
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 01:07 PM
Dec 2012

cuts will kick in, and we go from there, but the teabagger faithful in the House will never accept any deal with the Dems.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
72. They won't accept a deal but it will come one piece at a time.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:19 AM
Dec 2012


The first will be for reducing taxes on the middle class.


They will have to vote for it.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
55. This is political brinksmanship....
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 02:03 PM
Dec 2012

Obama is extending offers KNOWING they'll be swatted away. This is, what, the third one in two weeks? So come January 1, he'll be able to legitimately say that he offered compromise after compromise to the Republicans, but they would have none of it.

And so the Fiscal Cliff is entirely their fault. Out there in America, there are dozens of 2014 Democratic congressional candidate who are loving this.

NHDEMFORLIFE

(489 posts)
59. Totally right
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 04:54 PM
Dec 2012

I don't remember who coined the phrase - or even the precise wording, for that matter. But doesn't it go something like:
Making law is a ugly, messy business.
I prefer waiting to see a final product on the table before wielding a rhetorical sledgehammer on the White House.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
71. Maybe
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:04 AM
Dec 2012

Problem is, the Rethugs MAY actually bite, knowing they won't get better, but it's a hell of a lot more than they should be getting. Shitbag Cantor says they have the votes.

 

forestpath

(3,102 posts)
62. Fucked over by Nancy Pelosi too:
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 05:31 PM
Dec 2012
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/18/nancy-pelosi-fiscal-cliff_n_2324042.html

From the Huffington Post:

WASHINGTON -- House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is convinced her fellow Democrats will get behind the White House's latest "fiscal cliff" deal that cuts Social Security benefits and increases taxes on the middle class. Others in the party, however, hedged on the likelihood of that provision passing with a majority of Democratic votes.

President Barack Obama's latest offer in the fiscal cliff negotiations would allow the payroll tax holiday to expire, meaning middle-class workers will see smaller paychecks in 2013. It also proposes a Social Security reform known as "chained CPI" that would reduce the benefits senior citizens receive through Social Security.

Additionally, Obama's latest offer would permanently extend the Bush tax cuts for incomes of less than $400,000. Previously, the president had insisted that taxes increase on families with income above $250,000.

Despite these changes, Pelosi said she could convince her caucus to get behind such a plan, if need be.


Just one more reason I don't believe a word from any Democrat like Dick Durban who claims SS won't be cut.
 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
67. More crap from the TeaLEFTists. We got screwed over in 2010 by the TeaLeftists who bitched and
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 07:31 PM
Dec 2012

moaned and didn't vote, so we got the Republicans in the House and many more R Senators, and now they bitch because Obama has to govern with them. It just never ends. No reality. No sense.

FSogol

(47,623 posts)
69. +1
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 09:39 AM
Dec 2012

I don't think those people are really Democrats. This is just the beginning of the campaign to suppress liberal voting on 2014.
Even if they were honestly leftists, what politician/leader would ever meet their approval? None.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
73. I will wait until Obama releases his official statements about the 'deal'.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:24 AM
Dec 2012

What I care about most is the Bush tax breaks expire on Jan 1..that will happen no matter how much obama-hate-crap republicans throw around. Everything else will fall into place.

 

winetourdriver

(196 posts)
76. Really?
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:34 PM
Dec 2012

Come on, negotiations aren't even close to being over! Are you a troll or do your panties bunch for no reason?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Fucked over by Obama -- t...