2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRon Paul rips NRA plan for officers in every school
Published December 24, 2012 FoxNews.com
Retiring Republican Rep. Ron Paul pushed back Monday against the National Rifle Association's call for installing armed officers in every school, warning that the move could create a TSA-style maze of checkpoints and surveillance cameras -- with limited effect.
"School shootings, no matter how horrific, do not justify creating an Orwellian surveillance state in America," Paul said in a written statement.
The congressman, among the most libertarian-leaning on the Hill, is the first Republican in Congress to forcefully oppose the NRA's proposal. NRA head Wayne LaPierre on Friday urged federal funding to overhaul America's school security, a plan that would include posting a guard in every school.
-snip-
But Paul -- who said he agrees that "more guns equals less crime" and "private gun ownership prevents many shootings" -- nevertheless chided the NRA for its plan, describing it as a government solution that could infringe on liberty.
"Do we really want to live in a world of police checkpoints, surveillance cameras, metal detectors, X-ray scanners and warrantless physical searches? We see this culture in our airports: witness the shabby spectacle of once proud, happy Americans shuffling through long lines while uniformed TSA agents bark orders. This is the world of government provided 'security,' a world far too many Americans now seem to accept or even endorse," Paul said.
-snip-
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/24/ron-paul-rips-nra-plan-for-officers-in-every-school/#ixzz2G4xplifV
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Plus fuck Ron Paul.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Oh really?
lame54
(40,099 posts)Eugene
(67,313 posts)He's completely out of his mind, but he's consistent that way.
More guns and Jesus, not more government.
Cosmocat
(15,469 posts)"Do we really want to live in a world of police checkpoints, surveillance cameras, metal detectors, X-ray scanners and warrantless physical searches?:
But, the nailed this spot on.
You know it is the height of the absurd when he comes out against it.
NewJeffCT
(56,848 posts)There won't be too many others joining him.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)except it's usually for the wrong reasons. He says that most people don't want to live in some police state, but then goes on to say that he thinks more ammunition results in less crime and that any type of action at the federal level wouldn't do any good. Same thing with the WOD. I realized that it's so much that he favors drug legalization; he's just anti-federal government and doesn't want them to step in any kind of way.
This is why I've given him the nickname "Mr. Broken Clock".
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.