Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Peacetrain

(22,874 posts)
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 03:37 PM Nov 2013

I am seeing a lot of Warren will defeat Clinton ops

And if Elizabeth Warren decides she really does want to run.. she might.. then again she might not. If the primaries were held today, I would most definitely vote Hillary Clinton. But if Elizabeth Warren took the election and was the canidate.. I would most happily vote for her.

But the one thing I will NOT do.. is let the republicans get away with a Benghazi smear campaign to try and influence who I vote for.

They may have Secretary Clinton in their sights right now.. but trust me on this.. they have Senator Warren black ops warming up to smear her also.


Cheer and promote your canidate and all that they can possibly achieve. We all need that information.

So to all who nay nay one possibility over the other, do it with respect. DO NOT get played.

But better yet.. let us concentrate on one election at a time, and not lose sight of 2014.

Those state houses and congress seats will impact the efficacy of the next President like non other.

I am all about 2014.. plenty of time for the 2016 campaigns..

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am seeing a lot of Warren will defeat Clinton ops (Original Post) Peacetrain Nov 2013 OP
"they have Senator Warren black ops warming up to smear her also" NoOneMan Nov 2013 #1
Take it to the bank.. Peacetrain Nov 2013 #2
If Hillary is so smearable, why is she such a great candidate? NoOneMan Nov 2013 #3
You must not have been around for the 2004 election Peacetrain Nov 2013 #5
Every Dem candidate gets the repug smear treatment. HappyMe Nov 2013 #4
And I would vote for Clinton in the primary.. but I would NOT Peacetrain Nov 2013 #6
Meaning what? HappyMe Nov 2013 #9
The Bengazi smear has nothing to do pscot Nov 2013 #7
Fair point. Peacetrain Nov 2013 #8
She's already said, "Not interested." longship Nov 2013 #10
Absolutely!! Peacetrain Nov 2013 #11
Agreed davidpdx Nov 2013 #17
If she ran (which she won't) I doubt that Sen Warren would win NY against Clinton book_worm Nov 2013 #12
Why? HappyMe Nov 2013 #13
Demographics would favor Clintor over Warren in a primary BluegrassDem Nov 2013 #14
Obama had black voters because he was the better candidate Whisp Nov 2013 #19
She's. Not. Running. Please give this woman a break. She's. Not. Running. libdem4life Nov 2013 #15
I agree with you on the focus being next year's election davidpdx Nov 2013 #16
By the way davidpdx Nov 2013 #18
Who gives a shit about Benghazi outside of the Faux set? TheKentuckian Nov 2013 #20

Peacetrain

(22,874 posts)
2. Take it to the bank..
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 03:47 PM
Nov 2013

The GOP ran a bloody awful smear campaign against her when she ran again Scott Brown. Don't think for a second they are not working on something more against her.. as they continue to smear Hillary.



 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
3. If Hillary is so smearable, why is she such a great candidate?
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 03:50 PM
Nov 2013

You sound upset like this is something to be worried about, which is a strange thing to worry about when the inevitable candidate is, well, inevitable.

Peacetrain

(22,874 posts)
5. You must not have been around for the 2004 election
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 03:53 PM
Nov 2013
oh that is a good one.. No such animal as the "inevitable"

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
4. Every Dem candidate gets the repug smear treatment.
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 03:53 PM
Nov 2013


I would vote for Warren over Clinton in a primary type situation.

Peacetrain

(22,874 posts)
6. And I would vote for Clinton in the primary.. but I would NOT
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 03:56 PM
Nov 2013

piss in the water as we sometimes say locally.. Because if Warren won.. piece of cake.. I would vote for her.. If Biden decides he wants another toss at it.. and he won.. guess what I would gladly vote for him in the general.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
9. Meaning what?
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 04:12 PM
Nov 2013

That no criticism of Clinton is allowed? The President gets criticized here (fairly and unfairly) every day. Why should Clinton be immune?

longship

(40,416 posts)
10. She's already said, "Not interested."
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 05:37 PM
Nov 2013

So there's that.

Of course, there are many who still hold out for her.

My advice wait a year or so, preferably to late 2015. Then, let's have this conversation. It is silly and utterly foolish until then.

And it detracts from the very important discussions on what we need to do to win back the House and secure our lead in the Senate in 2014.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
17. Agreed
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 12:02 AM
Nov 2013

People are getting way ahead of themselves pushing the idea that we HAVE to choose a candidate NOW. That reeks of desperation.

It seems like most are using Chris Christie as the excuse for blowing their trumpets on picking a candidate now. I have never in my life heard of a party using a potential candidate in the other party as a reason for having to choose a candidate three years from the election.

 

BluegrassDem

(1,693 posts)
14. Demographics would favor Clintor over Warren in a primary
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 08:01 PM
Nov 2013

Obama had black voters with a vice grip in 2008. They will gravitate to Hillary next time. No way Warren will win Latinos and blacks. She'll do well with the elite liberals, highly educated, high income. That's not enough to win a nomination though.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
19. Obama had black voters because he was the better candidate
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 12:24 AM
Nov 2013

and not because he was black. Let's get that straight.

Just like Hillary will not get the women's vote just because she is a woman. She has to be the better candidate. And She Wasn't/Ain't.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
15. She's. Not. Running. Please give this woman a break. She's. Not. Running.
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 10:27 PM
Nov 2013

She is great where she is. No one can do what she is doing. Quitting her jobs...Senator and Representative of the Consumer, is not an option for Ms. Warren. Give it up already.

It is because the Republicans are in full steam ahead against Hillary that we must break out of our dire proclamations of the Evils of Three Years of Campaigning and Fundraising. We can do both 2014 and 2016 at the same time...really we can. Most of us, especially the online warriors, are capable of multi-tasking.

Christie has started. Iowa is being visited. PACs are forming. Corporate donations are being sought (by both parties) because they are needed for early political consultants and the organizations needed to bring in a billion dollars and win a general election. This doesn't happen in a candidate vacuum just for the heck of it.

Face it, we're "stuck" with Hillary.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
16. I agree with you on the focus being next year's election
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 11:56 PM
Nov 2013

If we don't get back the House and hold the Senate nothing will get done during Obama's last two years. Nothing. It will be more of the same.

I doubt that many people will disagree with me on this point.

There are going to be many races that will be close and down to the wire. We need to win them.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
18. By the way
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 12:04 AM
Nov 2013

I'm not oppose to either person as a candidate. What I'm advocating is that we see who runs instead of letting the GOP scare us into nominating who they want.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I am seeing a lot of Warr...