2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWATCH: Harry Reid's Full Speech Calling For Filibuster Reform
SAHIL KAPUR NOVEMBER 21, 2013, 11:32 AM EST
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) on Thursday made his case for reforming the filibuster via the "nuclear option" -- or a simple majority.
Read his full speech on the Senate floor below:
During this Congress the 113th Congress the United States Senate has wasted an unprecedented amount of time on procedural hurdles and partisan obstruction. As a result, the work of this country goes undone. Congress should be passing legislation that strengthens our economy and protects American families. Instead were burning wasted hours and wasted days between filibusters.
Even one of the Senates most basic duties confirmation of presidential nominees has become completely unworkable. For the first time in history, Republicans have routinely used the filibuster to prevent President Obama from appointing his executive team or confirming judges.
It is a troubling trend that Republicans are willing to block executive branch nominees even when they have no objection to the qualifications of the nominee. Instead, they block qualified executive branch nominees to circumvent the legislative process. They block qualified executive branch nominees to force wholesale changes to laws. They block qualified executive branch nominees to restructure entire executive branch departments. And they block qualified judicial nominees because they dont want President Obama to appoint any judges to certain courts.
The need for change is obvious. In the history of the Republic, there have been 168 filibusters of executive and judicial nominations. Half of them have occurred during the Obama Administration during the last four and a half years. These nominees deserve at least an up-or-down vote. But Republican filibusters deny them a fair vote and deny the President his team.
This gridlock has consequences. Terrible consequences. It is not only bad for President Obama and bad for the United States Senate; its bad for our country. It is bad for our national security and for our economic security.
Thats why its time to get the Senate working again not for the good of the current Democratic majority or some future Republican majority, but for the good of the country. Its time to change the Senate, before this institution becomes obsolete.
At the beginning of this Congress, the Republican Leader pledged that, quote, this Congress should be more bipartisan than the last Congress. Were told in scripture that, When a man makes a vow... he must not break his word. Numbers 30-2. In January, Republicans promised to work with the majority to process nominations in a timely manner by unanimous consent, except in extraordinary circumstances.
Exactly three weeks later, Republicans mounted a first-in-history filibuster of a highly qualified nominee for Secretary of Defense. Despite being a former Republican Senator and a decorated war hero, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagels nomination was pending in the Senate for a record 34 days, more than three times the previous average. Remember, our country was at war. Republicans have blocked executive branch nominees like Secretary Hagel not because they object to the qualifications of the nominee, but simply because they seek to undermine the very government in which they were elected to serve.
Take the nomination of Richard Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. There was no doubt about Mr. Cordrays ability to do the job. But the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau the brainchild of Senator Elizabeth Warren went for more than two years without a leader, because Republicans refused to accept the law of the land because they wanted to roll back a law that protects consumers from the greed of big Wall Street banks. I say to my Republican colleagues, you dont have to like the laws of the land. But you do have to respect those laws, acknowledge them and abide them.
Similar obstruction continued unabated for seven more months, until Democrats threatened to change Senate rules to allow up-or-down votes on executive nominees. In July, after obstructing dozens of executive nominees for months, and some for years, Republicans once again promised that they would end their unprecedented obstruction.
One look at the Senates Executive Calendar shows nothing has changed since July. Republicans have continued their record obstruction as if no agreement had ever been reached. Republicans have continued their record obstruction as if no vow had ever been made. There are currently 75 executive branch nominees ready to be confirmed by the Senate that have been waiting an average of 140 days for confirmation. One executive nominee to the agency that safeguards the water our children and grandchildren drink and the air they breathe has waited more than 800 days for confirmation.
We agreed in July that the Senate should be confirming nominees to ensure the proper functioning of government. But consistent and unprecedented obstruction by the Republican Caucus has turned advise and consent into deny and obstruct.
In addition to filibustering a nominee for Secretary of Defense for the first time in history, Senate Republicans also blocked a sitting member of Congress from an Administration position for the first time since 1843. As a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee, Congressman Mel Watts understanding of the mistakes that led to the housing crisis made him uniquely qualified to serve as administrator of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Senate Republicans simply dont like the consumer protections Congressman Watt was nominated to develop and implement. So they denied a fellow member of Congress and a graduate of Yale Law School even the courtesy of an up-or-down vote.
In the last three weeks alone, Republicans have blocked up-or-down votes on three highly qualified nominees to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, considered by many to be the second highest court in the land. Republicans have blocked four of President Obamas five nominees to the D.C. Circuit, whereas Democrats approved four of President Bushs six nominees to this important court. Today, 25 percent of the D.C. Circuit Court is vacant. There isnt a single legitimate objection to the qualifications of any of these nominees. Yet Republicans refused to give them an up-or-down vote a simple yes-or-no vote. Republicans simply dont want President Obama to make any appointments at all to this vital court.
Further, only 23 district court nominees have been filibustered in the entire history of this country. Twenty of them were nominated by President Obama. With one out of every 10 federal judgeships vacant, millions of Americans who rely on courts that are overworked and understaffed are being denied the justice they rightly deserve. More than half the nations population lives in a part of the country thats been declared a judicial emergency.
The American people are fed up with this kind of obstruction and gridlock. The American people Democrats, Republicans and Independents are fed up with this kind of obstruction and gridlock. The American people want Washington to work for American families once again.
I am on their side, which is why I propose an important change to the rules of the United States Senate. The present Republican Leader himself said, The Senate has repeatedly changed its rules as circumstances dictate. He is right. In fact, the Senate has changed its rules 18 times by sustaining or overturning the ruling of the presiding officer in the last 36 years, during the tenures of both Republican and Democratic majorities.
The change we propose today would ensure executive and judicial nominees get an up-or-down vote on confirmation yes or no. This rule change will make cloture for all nominations other than Supreme Court nominees a majority threshold vote yes or no.
The Senate is a living thing. And to survive, it must change. To the average American, adapting the rules to make Congress work again is just common sense. This is not about Democrats versus Republicans. This is about making Washington work regardless of whos in the White House or who controls the Senate. To remain relevant and effective as an institution, The Senate must evolve to meet the challenges of a modern era.
I have no doubt my Republican colleague will argue the fault lies with Democrats. I can say from experience that no ones hands are entirely clean on this issue. But today the important distinction is not between Democrats and Republicans. It is between those who are willing to help break the gridlock in Washington and those who defend the status quo.
Today Democrats and Independents are saying enough is enough. This change to the rules regarding presidential nominees will apply equally to both parties. When Republicans are in power, these changes will apply to them as well. Thats simple fairness. And its something both sides should be willing to live with to make Washington work again.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/read-harry-reid-s-full-speech-calling-for-filibuster-reform
northoftheborder
(7,572 posts)Was there ever a vote to change the rules? There's apparently a lot of talking and milling around during a vote to confirm a judicial nomination, after the vote to adjourn was voted down. The scroll at bottom says 60 votes needed. Perhaps the Repugs are going to allow votes on nominations without the rule change vote.?????
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)I want to see it happen. Pull the damn trigger Reid. What is he afraid of. Seems like someone is stalling. Reid got up and made a speech. Then the turtle McConnell gave his reply. Was there a deal made to, at least, mention it and make it "look" like something may happen knowing full well it wouldn't? We'll see. I have my doubts. But I do have my hopes.