Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Aristus

(66,316 posts)
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:12 PM Jul 2014

Any word if a test-case is going to be initiated re: ACA coverage for Viagra and vasectomies?

There has to be a progressive, wealthy business-owner out there somewhere interested in challenging the SCOTUS over the Hobby Lobby fiasco.

Put the Felonious Five on their guard. Make them come right out and say 'Yes for men; no for women.'

So some business owner can make a public statement regarding their henceforth refusal to cover Viagra, vasectomies, or any of a number of men's health issues.

How much of case law is decided by test cases such as the one I just described?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Any word if a test-case is going to be initiated re: ACA coverage for Viagra and vasectomies? (Original Post) Aristus Jul 2014 OP
I certainly hope so. n/t whathehell Jul 2014 #1
Yes! sheshe2 Jul 2014 #2
The ACA doesn't require coverage for vasectomies... PoliticAverse Jul 2014 #3
, blkmusclmachine Jul 2014 #4
I partially agree, but partially disagree davidpdx Jul 2014 #5
Is there a progressive, wealthy business owner who has a "sincerely held" religious objection onenote Jul 2014 #6

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
2. Yes!
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:17 PM
Jul 2014
"Put the Felonious Five on their guard. Make them come right out and say 'Yes for men; no for women."


Goddess! That would be perfect!

Thanks Aristus.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
3. The ACA doesn't require coverage for vasectomies...
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:17 PM
Jul 2014
https://www.healthcare.gov/what-are-my-birth-control-benefits/

Plans aren’t required to cover:

Drugs to induce abortions
Services related to a man’s reproductive capacity, like vasectomies

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
5. I partially agree, but partially disagree
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:01 AM
Jul 2014

I really agree that Viagra should not be covered by any insurance under the ACA. People who want that can find a Cadillac type of insurance to cover it.

As for a vasectomy, that's a bit different. Having had one at an early age (and I do mean early) I think insurance should cover it since it is a one time out patient procedure. I'm not sure how much it is now, but when I got mine it ran about $200.

I fundamentally disagree with the Hobby Lobby decision, but at the same time I don't think any birth control should be limited. It's not pitting women against men or men against women, but allowing a choice for couples or individuals who decide they either don't want children or the time is not right.

I understand that women need birth control for other reasons then to prevent pregnancies. When I was in college I was dating a woman who's menstruation was so bad, sometimes she would double over in pain. Even though I could not feel the pain, it didn't mean I couldn't feel empathy for her. There was in fact one time when I insisted she go to the emergency room and drove her there (I remember that because the doctor was a major dick).

So in my opinion it's not really right to put Viagra and vasectomies on the same stage.

onenote

(42,698 posts)
6. Is there a progressive, wealthy business owner who has a "sincerely held" religious objection
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 09:29 AM
Jul 2014

to vasectomies and Viagra? Might be hard to find such a person, I would think.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Any word if a test-case i...