Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(15,740 posts)
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 09:44 AM Sep 2014

Republicans tone down Benghazi talk as elections near

Just four months ago, the future chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi delighted core elements of the Republican base when he declared that the panel would be probing “what appears to be a White House cover-up.”

Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina said he had secret evidence proving that President Obama’s administration had deliberately withheld key documents from lawmakers looking into the Sept. 11, 2012 attack in the eastern Libyan city.

"I have evidence that not only are they hiding it, there’s an intent to hide it,” he told Fox News in May. “I can’t disclose that evidence yet, but I have evidence that there was a systematic intentional decision to withhold certain documents from Congress and we’re just sick of it.”

Now, with the 2014 mid-term elections fast approaching and the panel’s first hearing slated for September, the former prosecutor from Spartanburg, S.C., is taking a more tempered, bipartisan tone. He has declared that he wants to avoid a media “circus.” Other House Republicans are sending out similar signals, denying that their creation of the special panel ever was political in nature.

http://news.yahoo.com/republicans-tone-down-benghazi-talk-as-elections-near-042821732.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans tone down Benghazi talk as elections near (Original Post) Zorro Sep 2014 OP
Secret evidence Zambero Sep 2014 #1
Given all of the investigations Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2014 #3
And yet....... Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2014 #2
The Benghazi investigation scam timeline only proves kairos12 Sep 2014 #4
too many ongoing scandals and disasters, ... quadrature Sep 2014 #5
I posted this in GD: there is a new book out that will put Benghazi on the front burner Justice Sep 2014 #6
wonder how many millions/billion? Republicans cost the USA with JUST their Benghazi scam? Sunlei Sep 2014 #7

Zambero

(8,964 posts)
1. Secret evidence
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 10:11 AM
Sep 2014

So secret that it was still in the process of being fabricated, yet again. Reminds me of that old Herman's Hermits song with the line "Second verse, same as the first!".

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
3. Given all of the investigations
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 09:21 PM
Sep 2014

They're pretty damned incompetent to not have found evidence for even ONE of their Benghazi! conspiracy theories. And nobody can say that John Boehner or any of the Republicans running the house have been beholden to President Obama and/or covering up for him.

 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
5. too many ongoing scandals and disasters, ...
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 01:35 AM
Sep 2014

right now,
for Benghazi to get the proper attention.

come back in six months

Justice

(7,186 posts)
6. I posted this in GD: there is a new book out that will put Benghazi on the front burner
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 01:15 PM
Sep 2014

There is a new book out about Benghazi. The book is written by a professor at Boston University and co-authored by the "private contractors" hired by the CIA who were working at the CIA annex; two of them died fighting the attackers later that night. All of the private contractors were former members of American Special Forces teams.

According to the book, the CIA station chief, referred to in the book only as “Bob,” was the person who told the private contractors to not immediately go and try to rescue Stevens and Sullivan and others. Bob didn't want to blow the cover of the CIA Annex and so was trying to enlist support from Libyan militia allies to complete the rescue. The Libyans apparently never arrived to help.

These men say that if they were allowed to immediately go to the rescue of Stevens and Sullivan - the two would be alive. I don't know how they can say that because 2 of their own were killed that night. But I would also not be surprised if what they say about Bob is true - that the mission to keep the CIA's presence quiet was so important that they wanted to have the Libyans perform the rescue and avoid blowing their cover.

The book says Bob made the decision on his own - no one told him to do so.

Many aspects of what they say make sense. I am surprised that they don't have a duty of confidentiality to the CIA about this. Also members of the Intelligence Committee and Trey Gowdy surely must know this story and thus it reveals just how sick Republicans are to pervert what happened into something completely different.

People want war and conflict to be neat and tidy - sometimes it ain't. It is tragic but it is conflict. I don't know that what Bob did was wrong or right - or whether the delay would have made a difference.



Book review and other details in NYT at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/05/world/africa/new-book-says-cia-official-in-benghazi-held-up-rescue.html?ref=todayspaper

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Republicans tone down Ben...