Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

genwah

(574 posts)
Tue Sep 9, 2014, 02:25 AM Sep 2014

Hey, I forgot Scott brown was a lobbyist! Lessig didn't, though...

Remember that Incumbent Senator Brown who lost to Elizabrth Warren? He got lost and is now running for Senate from New Hampshire against Jim Rubens. His campaign has been trying to get Lawrence Lesig to quit calling Brown a lobbyist on account of Senator=speak being better than regular English. I take it Mr. Reed’s outrage is triggered by the Senate’s regulations of what constitutes being a “lobbyist” for purposes of the Senate rules. I hadn’t received the memo that explained that the English language is now regulated by the rules of the United States Senate. If there is such a memo, they should send it to The Hill too.

I really don't want Scott Brown in the Senate with Elizabeth Warren. It would seem like such a waste of our money from the last time.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hey, I forgot Scott brown was a lobbyist! Lessig didn't, though... (Original Post) genwah Sep 2014 OP
LOL, Scotty is just drawing more attention to it by whining about it. tanyev Sep 2014 #1
Completely agree here and the more it is heard, the more it really is believed karynnj Sep 2014 #2

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
2. Completely agree here and the more it is heard, the more it really is believed
Tue Sep 9, 2014, 09:33 AM
Sep 2014

Like any similar person, it was exactly Brown's connections from his time in the Senate that the company was buying. How else do you explain a job, with no real fixed hours, that pays the money this did? His previous legal work was as a real estate lawyer and as a JAG during the small amount of time he did his annual work. NONE of this made him an expert on any legal area - something that could have justified paying him a lot of money.

The more he complains, the more people, not connected to Shaheen, should get out what his compensation was and ask what exactly he did for the company ... if not connecting them to decision makers which gets pretty close to lobbying. The thing is this does not really depend on what "lobbying" means. What people dislike about the resolving door is that people who leave government make big bucks selling access to those who remain. (This argument over definition does not work in his favor.)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hey, I forgot Scott brown...