Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I know I'll be corrected if I'm wrong, but wasn't Hillary inevitable once before, (Original Post) hedgehog Sep 2014 OP
Yes, elleng Sep 2014 #1
Yes, and she didn't have "much experience," either. She had only been in politically-elected office Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2014 #32
Ssssshhhhhhhh......... djean111 Sep 2014 #2
only political morons believe they can pick a winner before the campaign season begins pipoman Sep 2014 #3
Ya know ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #4
well, not exactly AtomicKitten Sep 2014 #10
I disagree. It's here all over DU. The arrogance is palatable, just as it was in 2008. Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2014 #33
only ones on DU that even use that word VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #5
Maybe the exact word of inevitability isn't used, but the message from many is the same. LawDeeDah Sep 2014 #14
then stop using it. VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #15
I don't believe polls mean anything this far out of the game. LawDeeDah Sep 2014 #16
you dont have to....but WE Democrats can! VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #17
I am a Democrat, what are you? LawDeeDah Sep 2014 #19
apparently you aren't if you are SAD that a candidate can beat all Republicans... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #20
Well there you go again. Hillary not getting the nom does not mean some other D won't. LawDeeDah Sep 2014 #24
and THAT doesn't mean that THEY can beat Republicans either then does it? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #25
It appears that those who are not CLEAR alternatives do not win. TheNutcracker Sep 2014 #6
What clear alternatives to "can BEAT all Republicans" with polling proof do you have? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #21
Do you think she has forgotten? JoePhilly Sep 2014 #7
And almost an inevitable two years ago? marble falls Sep 2014 #8
She's now more inevitabler than ever! AtomicKitten Sep 2014 #9
Thank goodness....cause I don't know about you but....I want to WIN! VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #22
there is a massive difference between her position then and her position now dsc Sep 2014 #11
the campaign hasn't begun. ..not a single tough question pipoman Sep 2014 #12
She was never over 50 in the 2008 campaign dsc Sep 2014 #18
and how does she poll against Republicans? And who do you have that can do better than that? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #23
she has tended to lead in head to head polls with republicans dsc Sep 2014 #29
BUT you have no one who beats that... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #30
depends on the other candidate dsc Sep 2014 #31
Inevitable and came down in flames. LawDeeDah Sep 2014 #13
Unless she's running for office in 2014, I currently don't give a flying fuck about Hillary Clinton arcane1 Sep 2014 #26
thread winner AtomicKitten Sep 2014 #27
True customerserviceguy Sep 2014 #28
 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
32. Yes, and she didn't have "much experience," either. She had only been in politically-elected office
Wed Sep 24, 2014, 03:59 PM
Sep 2014

for two years up until then.

I will not be voting for Hillary, and part of it is due to her arrogant-ass fans.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
4. Ya know ...
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 12:06 PM
Sep 2014

the only ones I hear/see talking about the "inevitability" of HRC are pundits (not exactly known for non-sh!t stirring in the run up to elections) and those that prefer a different candidate.

Just saying ...

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
33. I disagree. It's here all over DU. The arrogance is palatable, just as it was in 2008.
Wed Sep 24, 2014, 04:02 PM
Sep 2014

The self-righteous indignation of anyone who dare question why Hillary should not be the candidate. How dare they?

Her fans have coronated her as well. And they are rude, arrogant, and to prove their loyalty, they always have something snarky to say about the current president. They do not realize that by doing so, they turn off many people who would ordinarily be inclined to support Hillary.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
15. then stop using it.
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 04:38 PM
Sep 2014

She is waaaaay ahead in the polls....that is all we are telling you non believers .

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
16. I don't believe polls mean anything this far out of the game.
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 04:44 PM
Sep 2014

And I also believe that anything is possible and Hillary could very well win the nomination, which would be very sad. About belief, I think the few here who thoroughly and unconditionally believe Clinton will win the nom and the Presidency is what should be in question.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
17. you dont have to....but WE Democrats can!
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 04:47 PM
Sep 2014

If you were a democrat you would not be sad about a candidate that beats all Republicans....thats how I Know..

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
19. I am a Democrat, what are you?
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 07:30 PM
Sep 2014

You don't have a very good bedside manner if you are trying to convince people that Hillary is the one. Indirectly it can do the opposite and turn people right off.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
20. apparently you aren't if you are SAD that a candidate can beat all Republicans...
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 07:33 PM
Sep 2014

and you WILL end up voting for her...

Indirectly....MOST people support her right now.....including MOST Democrats.....AND she polls better than ANY Republican candidate so far...AND she has one helluva ground game already.....

Should I go on with my proof....

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
24. Well there you go again. Hillary not getting the nom does not mean some other D won't.
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 07:38 PM
Sep 2014

You have no proof of anything, just because You say she will beat all Repubs does not make it so. If that is true, can you repeat a few times over and truly believe that my old Honda in the driveway is really a shiney apple red Jaguar?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
25. and THAT doesn't mean that THEY can beat Republicans either then does it?
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 07:53 PM
Sep 2014

and SHE has the polls to prove it....

What have YOU got?

Notta... that's what....

 

TheNutcracker

(2,104 posts)
6. It appears that those who are not CLEAR alternatives do not win.
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 12:16 PM
Sep 2014

We been made to believe those with any real difference cannot win. We been had!


GO BERNIE SANDERS

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
7. Do you think she has forgotten?
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 01:08 PM
Sep 2014

Think about it.

Do you think Hillary has forgotten the mistakes that cost her the nomination in 2008?

Do you think she'll only plan through February?

Do you think she'll ignore the caucus states?

Do you see another Obama on the horizon?

The answers to these questions matter.

dsc

(52,152 posts)
11. there is a massive difference between her position then and her position now
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 01:25 PM
Sep 2014

then she was never, as in not in a single, solitary poll, at or above 50% while she is now at 50% or more in every single solitary poll.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
12. the campaign hasn't begun. ..not a single tough question
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 03:40 PM
Sep 2014

When was she never over 50%? After the campaign began? I'm not saying she can't win the nomination, she is one stupid speech, or losing debate away from obscurity.

dsc

(52,152 posts)
18. She was never over 50 in the 2008 campaign
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 05:27 PM
Sep 2014

meaning that she could keep all her support, and in point of fact gain support as she did, and still lose the nomination. She is a known quantity (basically very close to an incumbent) with well over 50 percent and a huge lead. Barring a massive implosion which pretty much never happens she should win.

dsc

(52,152 posts)
29. she has tended to lead in head to head polls with republicans
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 10:05 PM
Sep 2014

and do better in them than any alternatives. But her leads are way less pronounced in those polls and she isn't over 50 in them so it would be by no means a sure thing.

dsc

(52,152 posts)
31. depends on the other candidate
Wed Sep 24, 2014, 11:22 AM
Sep 2014

Biden has been repeatedly polled and Cuomo has been polled some. The rest not so much.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
26. Unless she's running for office in 2014, I currently don't give a flying fuck about Hillary Clinton
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 08:02 PM
Sep 2014

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
28. True
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 09:01 PM
Sep 2014

But tell me who is waiting in the wings to be the first ______ American President, who can possibly top her first woman President schtick?

Joe Biden wouldn't even be the first old President. Nobody in the possible running who's got anything going for them can beat that first woman President thing.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I know I'll be corrected ...