Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 06:35 PM Oct 2014

Hillary Clinton about to campaign/speak for Alison Grimes

Coming up on Hardball..Chris Matthews.

Aside from what one thinks of Hillary, if her appearance can help put an end to McTurtle..i say go girls!!

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton about to campaign/speak for Alison Grimes (Original Post) misterhighwasted Oct 2014 OP
she better have some magic DonCoquixote Oct 2014 #1
Win or lose this race will saying nothing at all about the wisdom of that strategy dsc Oct 2014 #3
Bill Clinton won Kentucky twice, Jimmy Carter won it in 1976 Hawaii Hiker Oct 2014 #4
ross Perot split the anti democratic vote dsc Oct 2014 #5
Perot wasn't a real factor in Clinton's wins wyldwolf Oct 2014 #6
If she can help anywhere, Jackpine Radical Oct 2014 #2

DonCoquixote

(13,949 posts)
1. she better have some magic
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 06:52 PM
Oct 2014

because of grimes loses, it will say a lot about Clinton's own "I run to Obama's right" strategy.

dsc

(53,338 posts)
3. Win or lose this race will saying nothing at all about the wisdom of that strategy
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 06:59 PM
Oct 2014

in a nationwide run. No Democrat running for President will carry Kentucky barring a split of the anti Democratic vote (ie a three way race where there are two right of center candidates) and the status of this race won't change that basic fact.

wyldwolf

(43,891 posts)
6. Perot wasn't a real factor in Clinton's wins
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 10:27 AM
Oct 2014
http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/third_party_myth_easterbrook/

http://www.leinsdorf.com/perot.htm

in 1992 Perot's presence on the ballot cost Bush: Montana, North Carolina, Colorado and Georgia. However, Perot cost Clinton: Florida and Arizona in 1992. So, in 1992, Perot cost Clinton 32 electoral votes while costing Bush 37 electoral votes. Bush lost by 100 electoral votes, so 5 more would not have given him victory.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2441231

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton about to ...