Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts) Thu May 17, 2012, 06:28 PM May 2012

No, the New York Times isn't biased against Obama at all...

http://crasstalk.com/2012/05/ny-times-goof-obama-is-slick-and-cocky/

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No, the New York Times isn't biased against Obama at all... (Original Post) Drunken Irishman May 2012 OP

Looking Slick and Cocky?? Thrill May 2012 #1

It's a quote from the SuperPAC proposal to attack Obama muriel_volestrangler May 2012 #2

Thrill

(19,178 posts)

1. Looking Slick and Cocky??

Reply to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Thu May 17, 2012, 07:07 PM

May 2012

Nice Journalism. No integrity anymore

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)

2. It's a quote from the SuperPAC proposal to attack Obama

Reply to Thrill (Reply #1)

Fri May 18, 2012, 07:31 AM

May 2012

the 'one of the most provocative campaigns' mentioned below it (the one that Ricketts has been trying to disown). However, it does look pretty bad that it was what the NYT chose to display from it.

Here's the proposal: http://www.scribd.com/doc/93914788/SuperPAC-Proposal

Reply to this discussion