Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 01:26 PM Feb 2015

5 Reasons why Warren might run,

1.) A formidable progressive challenger to Hillary Clinton doesn't emerge. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Vice President Biden and Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley are often listed as Democratic alternatives to the all-but-declared Clinton candidacy. But none has Warren's star power among the progressive base....................

2.) Donors rally behind Warren. Warren has already proven herself to be a prodigious fundraiser. donors." .................

3.) It's now or never. At 65, Warren is only one year younger than Clinton, even though age concerns tend to be raised more often in the latter’s case. ..........................

4.) The economy dips again. Clinton has been tight-lipped about her 2016 economic pitch, but liberals are hoping she'll offer a plan that would expand Social Security and increase big bank regulations. If she doesn't, they hope a Democratic primary challenger would push her to the left. .......................

5.) Hillary sits it out. If Clinton doesn't run for president, the Democratic field would be wide open and Warren would be a front-runner........................."That’s the beauty of presidential politics, you never know what random plot twist is going to catapult a random candidate into the spotlight," Singer added.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/220896-five-reasons-warren-might-run

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5 Reasons why Warren might run, (Original Post) Cal33 Feb 2015 OP
At this point I only see her running if '5)' Hillary doesn't. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2015 #1
You could be right. Nobody really knows. Cal33 Feb 2015 #2
Yep. But she will run, so none of the above really apply. nt onehandle Feb 2015 #3
I wonder if in the end, the money people might actually encourage #5 to happen... cascadiance Feb 2015 #6
I hope she doesn't run and stays in the Senate. virgogal Feb 2015 #4
My take exactly. She's so good at what she's doing. She'd have to go to these same money libdem4life Feb 2015 #12
She would have declared but then saw that "run Liz Run" song. fbc Feb 2015 #5
"A formidable progressive challenger to Hillary Clinton doesn't emerge" brooklynite Feb 2015 #7
I have no hope that HRC will offer a plan to expand SS and increase big bank regulations. winter is coming Feb 2015 #8
WSJ: Clinton Consults to Define Economic Pitch antigop Feb 2015 #16
I'm confused workinclasszero Feb 2015 #9
Its time for someone new SmittynMo Feb 2015 #10
She's not running but Bernie will tracks29 Feb 2015 #11
There's still a lot of doubt. If he does run, he adds to the debate but will NEVER get nominated. RBInMaine Feb 2015 #14
I suppose he's waiting to see if Warren would run, among other things. If she does run, Sanders Cal33 Feb 2015 #15
Here's ONE reason she WILL NOT RUN. She has SAID SO OVER AND OVER AGAIN. End this PIPEDREAM. RBInMaine Feb 2015 #13
The more you yell, the less people listen. n/t winter is coming Feb 2015 #17
In addition to the yelling, I'd add LiberalElite Feb 2015 #18
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
6. I wonder if in the end, the money people might actually encourage #5 to happen...
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 03:23 PM
Feb 2015

If both Hillary and Warren (or another liberal like Bernie Sanders runs against Hilary), then there is a lot more likely that populist issues will be brought up in the primaries, and force all candidates to take stances that they know won't upset an already upset public who can't stand the corrupt state of affairs that the 1% have us in today in terms of those who represent us.

If Hillary weren't running, and Warren were to run instead, the money people might feel that they would be more apt to have bigger influence with an Elizabeth Warren administration, if she doesn't do as much public stances on populist issues through a primary campaign that wouldn't have Hillary in it that would provoke an increased emphasis from hers other others' campaigns to do so.

I'd like to think for us populists that in the end it wouldn't matter with someone like Elizabeth Warren getting elected. That even if we don't have as much debate on issues concerning populists in the primaries, that Elizabeth Warren would still have stances if elected to support the beliefs/stances we have on such issues in the course of her administration. Much moreso than someone like Obama has, who has let his more nebulous "Change" campaign morph in to an administration that supports things like the TPP, etc. since he wasn't forced to take as strong a positions on free trade in the primaries in 2008, even though when he did, he made it sound then like he wouldn't support things like the TPP.

 

virgogal

(10,178 posts)
4. I hope she doesn't run and stays in the Senate.
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 01:36 PM
Feb 2015

Elections have turned into such dirty, mud-slinging fights and she has such class I think she would not do well in the fray.

I mean this as a compliment and can see her doing wonderful things in the Senate, as Ted Kennedy did.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
12. My take exactly. She's so good at what she's doing. She'd have to go to these same money
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 10:25 PM
Feb 2015

people she's been investigating and ask for money for her campaign. Does not make ANY sense at all.

 

fbc

(1,668 posts)
5. She would have declared but then saw that "run Liz Run" song.
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 01:41 PM
Feb 2015

She just was not willing to inflict that horrible song on any ears that had been fortunate enough to avoid it.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
7. "A formidable progressive challenger to Hillary Clinton doesn't emerge"
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 03:46 PM
Feb 2015

Since Warren has encouraged Clinton to run, why would this apply?

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
8. I have no hope that HRC will offer a plan to expand SS and increase big bank regulations.
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 03:57 PM
Feb 2015

Clinton's tight lips about her 2016 economic pitch is not an encouraging sign, either. Either she has no plan, which is bad, or she's trying to focus-group a way to have her cake and eat it, too, which is also bad.

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
10. Its time for someone new
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 05:53 PM
Feb 2015

If Hilliary runs, there's a lot of baggage that comes with her. We need someone, with new thoughts, ideas, and a set of balls. Warren and Sanders can do that!!!!! I'd love to see them run as a team.

tracks29

(98 posts)
11. She's not running but Bernie will
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 09:27 PM
Feb 2015

Whichever side you pick (Hillary/Bernie) that's up to you. There are enough debate threads on that topic.

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
14. There's still a lot of doubt. If he does run, he adds to the debate but will NEVER get nominated.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:06 AM
Feb 2015

He is a confirmed "socialist." Not gonna happen.

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
15. I suppose he's waiting to see if Warren would run, among other things. If she does run, Sanders
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:23 AM
Feb 2015

will be for her. He knows that she has a better chance of winning in Nov. 2016 than he.
And he is that type of decent person.

This time before the Primaries is a very complicated and apparently divisive one. But once
it's over, I hope Democrats will know enough to stick together for the common good -- and
leave their personal pet peeves out of the way.

I'm for Warren, Sanders, Franken, Grayson, O'Malley....etc.... But if Hillary should win in
the Primaries, not voting for her in Nov. 2016 would be helping the Corporations to deal the
death-blow to democracy in our country. It would be like slitting our own throats! Hillary
as president would, at least, allow a weakened democracy to live a little longer, and hopefully
the president after her will be a Progressive one.

Where there is life, there is hope.

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
13. Here's ONE reason she WILL NOT RUN. She has SAID SO OVER AND OVER AGAIN. End this PIPEDREAM.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:04 AM
Feb 2015

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
18. In addition to the yelling, I'd add
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:00 PM
Feb 2015

implying or coming right out and saying that people who disagree aren't living in the real world, or are otherwise mentally/psychologically deficient.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»5 Reasons why Warren migh...