Any Questions?

[babylonsister]

[annabanana]

1. k&r . . . .n/t

[jenmito]

2. K&R. Time to tweet this! n/t

[kickysnana]

3. Given President Obama's Presidential history what theremakes you think he would appoint progrssives?

[byronius]

5. Sotomayor? Ever heard that name?

What's a progrssive?

[scheming daemons]

6. because he is 2-for-2 in appointing progressives to the SCOTUS so far

[treestar]

10. Liberals, it says

But he would not appoint actual conservatives.

[Drunken Irishman]

11. Uh, the fact that he's appointed two already?

[kickysnana]

14. That would only mean he feels he should now reach across the divide again and appoint conservatives

Just saying what I see with other appointments and policies.

[Drunken Irishman]

15. You see what you want to see...

Your logic isn't even worth debating. If that was the case, he would have done it with Kagan, since she was his second pick and balancing a liberal with a conservative fits what you claim is his mold.

Do you really believe what you type or do you just type whatever crap pops into your head?

[progressoid]

4. Scalia is expected to retire?

I doubt that excrement would retire knowing that a "liberal" might replace him. He's going to be a scourge on us for another 4 years at least.

[FSogol]

8. Scalia has poor eating habits. While it would be wrong to speculate on

this, he might solve the problem himself.

[progressoid]

12. That would be fine with me!

But sometimes the evil ones seem to hang on forever.

Like Cheney or ...

[FSogol]

7. Should add that Romney has named Robert F'ing Bork as his judicial adviser.

[hwmnbn]

9. K&R

[Tarheel_Dem]

13. K&R

[Paulie]

16. Big time K&R!!!!