2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumLondon Lover Man
(371 posts)Zero executive experience. SoS doesn't count - she abused her position.
Bernie, on the other hand, has executive experience.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)I'll wait. Thanks.
London Lover Man
(371 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Any position a candidate takes who has ever been in office is also a use of power. It would be a difference of opinion, not abuse of power.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)I have been a big supporter of HRC since the 90s so forgive if what the Bernie folks are calling attacks seems laughable to me. People have spent millions of dollars calling my candidate a murderer, so whatevs.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)for office, who has held elected positions for decades, are naive, ignorant of politics, ignorant of what it takes to govern, iow, that they are clueless.
Heard the same thing about Obama, 'it's one thing to be a Senator for a few years but government is a whole different thing'.
Can you point to ANY President who had Presidential experience before they became President?
Bernie will make an outstanding executive, he has all the qualities needed in a leader, I'm not worried, not sure why you are frankly.
Why don't you write about your candidate on the issues, that's what people are interested in.
I think this might be the third 'memo to Bernie supporters' so far this week.
Do you think that if people support a different candidate than you do, that makes them 'the other' or incompetent or something?
I used to be a Hillary supporter, and remember the attacks on her, and defended her fiercely against them, but those were from the Right. I don't recall the Left attacking her the way some on the Left are attacking Bernie Sanders, but he expected that, he's been in politics a long time.
I stopped supporting Hillary politically because she has been so wrong so often on issues that are so very important. Bernie otoh, on the same issues, has been so right. For me, that's what matters, issues.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Any other questions, Sabrina. Look forward to your passionate advocacy for the Democratic ticket next year.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)support to the Democratic nominee, Bernie Sanders. Also to all the Progressive Dems we are getting behind right now. He will need a very strong Progressive Congress to help him pass the legislation the people want him to pass.
Otoh, being that we live in a democracy, you are free NOT to support Sanders after he wins the Dem Nomination,
It's your choice, you are in a free country or so we are told. Though when I see people being threatened as to who they should vote for, I sometimes wonder.
Memo to Hillary Supporters, stop telling people who to vote for'. Yes, maybe it's time to write a memo to Hillary supporters.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Not saying you never have. I just don't remember it.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)and refused to apologize for his employment as campaign surrogate an infamous 'ex gay' evangelist who had been on the 700 Club declaring war on gay people and accusing us of killing children. When LGBT people objected to that, Obama and his supporters basically flipped us the bird, including here on DU where we were told repeatedly that it was 'just one little song' and 'you people just want your pony' and 'stop the poutrage'. This was for objecting to a man who called us child killers being the star of a Democratic rally.
So Bernie, compared to Obama? Ok. Sure.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)The media/GOP really went after Obama on Rev. Wright, flag pins and secret Muslim connections.
Bernie is getting no such treatment.
spqr78
(73 posts)If the media wants to attack him, they have to talk about him. Which is why until netroots he was rarely mentioned. When he was mentioned it was to compare him to Hillary (to illustrate how awesome she is).
The only time Bernie is covered for his own achievements or policies is on the Ed Show.
Oh well.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I just wanted to give you a
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I'm assuming you are supporting him considering you are looking for someone who has governed.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)Secretary of State is not an administrative executive position. It's one of the few positions in the cabinet, the other notably being Attorney General, where the cabinet secretary is not the administrative head of their own department, that being a duty assigned to an undersecretary.
So no, being Secretary of State doesn't count because she didn't run the State Department. The cabinet secretary in such a situation functions more to dictate the operational philosophy of the department and perform specific non-administrative duties. Someone else is tasked with implementing that philosophy and running the department...in the case of State, this is done intentionally to allow the Sec. of State more time to do their actual job of being the chief foreign emissary of the US government.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Just like Obama
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)I certainly hope so. I truly do.
I hope I am soo wrong about her and I will happily eat humble pie. Happily!
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I have found word changes like that tone down aggressive responses. Seems it is a little too nuanced.
artislife
(9,497 posts)The voice inside my head was willing to be completely wrong about my ideas of her being the nomination. And truly wanting to be wrong about how I have viewed her potential.
Words on flat screens cannot convey the intent sometimes.
I wasn't bashing her, but maybe me...and my preconceived ideas. This week has really made me tired of the supporter wars.
There is so much more that needs our attention.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The aggressive part was in no was directed toward you. You can see who I replied to using the more gentle tactic. I see by how I wrote that it wasn't clear.
artislife
(9,497 posts)We will get through this, yes we will
:
neverforget
(9,436 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Try leading by example.
demmiblue
(36,850 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Whatever that means.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)sgtbenobo
(327 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)The poor little kittens.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)But they were totes seriose!
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Please provide evidence of me, anywhere, or any time, suggesting that politics aren't "tough." I've had 55 years to learn just how tough politics can be. I don't care how "tough" it gets; business as usual in the form of disingenuous manipulation and corruption isn't okay, and should be kicked into the light.
And please point me to all the governors on DU who know better than I how "tough" it is to govern. Or to where I've ever said a candidate would find it easy to do so.
In reality, it would be nice to quit throwing out broad brush attack memos, and address issues. Sander's supporters are not a single, monolithic entity, any more than any other sub-group of the population.
If you really want to open a dialogue with Sander's supporters, let's talk issues. That's what drives THIS Sander's supporter, anyway.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)When you can smell the desperation wafting out of a thread you know someone is feeling threatened.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)your favorite candidate is: Where and when has she
governed any town, county, or state?
I really would like to know that.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)as executive experience.
TM99
(8,352 posts)She served the President who was her higher executive officer if we are using the corporate business model.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)since the Reagan revolution in the 1980's, we act like it is. We structure everything including education like a corporate entity.
The truth still holds that Clinton has zero executive experience.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)By the simplicity of the point they made, one can only conclude they must support O'Malley. But they don't.
Even if not using the business model your rightly opined on, it isn't governing in the manner the op meant in any way. Kind of like saying the police govern in stead of upholding the laws that those who govern sign.
For me, I see that O'Malley and Sanders have both had executive experience. They have been mayor''s and in O'Malley's case also a governor.
Clinton has zero executive experience.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)But don't let facts get in the way of what you're trying to say.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)as SOS she did perform negotiations, run a full department of staff, made Congressional and Senatorial statements and responded to inquisitions, she had budgetary impacts (remember how she asked for extra security money prior to Bengahzi and was turned down). I don't know how one can be the head person in a position and not run the department. Her's was not an elected position as SOS, but to try and discount this as having immense and valuable insight into international dealings and is a plus for POTUS, is disingenious. But then there was more the Hillary than SOS...right. She was a State Senator?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Pay to play isn't governing...
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)You think flame baiting is tough? Try the steak.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Hillary supporters are. Burn it down! #vanillarytoowhite!
Or not.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Thanks.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Wow
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)Thanks so much for your concern, bless your little heart!
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Phrasing. It's important.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Do you make it a habit to post poorly worded things that don't really matter?
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)lol