2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton Is Not A Stronger Candidate Than Bernie Sanders - HuffPo
Clinton Is Not a Stronger Candidate Than Bernie SandersLiam Miller - HuffPo
Posted: 07/28/2015 5:09 pm EDT Updated: 1 hour ago
<snip>
It's just so obvious.
A recent CNN poll shows Sanders can beat the possible Republican nominees; and mind you, that's with Sanders not having full name-recognition yet (as in, 41 percent of respondents said they didn't know who he was).
But you can put it really simply.
* Clinton is so reviled by the Right (almost entirely unfairly, but still), that they will come out in droves to oppose her. It's not hard to see that that plays a role in Republicans being so much more excited about the election; they, like so many, are assuming Clinton will be the nominee, and they can't wait to vote against her.
* Sanders speaks to, inspires and motivates people all over the political map -- not just the "far Left" as the simple-minded, when-you're-a-hammer-everything-looks-like-a-sickle-wielding-socialist media would have us believe.
* Sanders is inspiring people to register to vote who have not registered before, and engaging millennials (only 20 percent of whom voted in 2014) in huge numbers.
Beltway insiders do not know how to talk about Sanders; all of the rules they use to frame their conversations don't apply. It really shows just how lazy and formulaic political coverage has become -- how out of touch with real people. I'm reminded of Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions. According to Kuhn, scientists will brush off data that call into question accepted theories (and they do that because they have a lot invested in those theories -- published work, research grants, tenure).
Eventually, though, enough information comes in that challenges the established way of looking at things that a crisis point is reached; the inadequacies of the previous way of understanding become impossible to ignore any longer. Then a scientific revolution takes place and a new way of understanding is embraced -- a new paradigm. (The classic example is the topic of Kuhn's book The Copernican Revolution, which chronicles the shift away from believing that the Earth was the center of the universe... Hmmm.)
You can see that crisis of understanding taking place in American politics, and it applies to those who cover it just as much as it applies to the elected officials they cover. They all seem to be saying, "how can this guy be doing so well? Everything we know about politics tells us he can't."
Maybe they should start paying attention to...
<snip>
More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/liam-miller/sanders_b_7883450.html
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)MAKE IT STOP!
Big Rec was here.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)pocoloco
(3,180 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)Another source which the GOP will draw on in an anti-Clinton campaign is Kathleen Willey's website, http://www.ascandaladay.com/about-us.html and the book Willey wrote: "Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton". Are all the charges true? True or not, they will be part and parcel of the daily news throughout the general election campaign. The GOP is salivating at the prospect of campaigning against and voting against HRC. HRC will have negative coat tails - with her at the top of the ticket, those good Dems running for lesser offices will suffer from a high GOP turnout.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)How can anyone "refutiate" this?
appalachiablue
(44,060 posts)K & R! I'll drink to that.
Democracy is overrated anyway.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)This isn't going to sit well ...

Meanwhile at the Blankfein residence, things are starting to get a little tense...

passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)with "putting food on your family".
moobu2
(4,822 posts)always has been always will be. Look at how they promoted Elizabeth Warren and she wasnt even running.
Bernie Sanders is not going to win the nomination. People dont really understand that he's a certifiable socialist and once lived on a commune. lol He'll be lucky to get any sates in the general once everybody knows who and what he is.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Don't worry. President-elect Clinton's natural affinity with regular folk, her authentic, off-the-cuff speaking style, and her impeccable populist credentials will eventually come through for her. I'm sure of it!
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)What degree of mortal danger is prevalent if I opt to hold my breath?
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)That sounds like as good ah advice an any! I'll stick my thumbs in both ears, so I can't exhale!
arlington.mass
(41 posts)And yet there are people like me who have become jaded about politics, and are now re-entering the arena for the first time in many years
I don't care if Bernie is a "socialist"
I care that he is an outsider who is being supported by his people, not big money PAC's
I care that he has stood for the same things for decades
I care that he supports working class people
I care that he supports quality health care for all
I care that he has always fought for equality for all
I haven't been FOR anyone in a long time, but I'm 100% with Bernie and I'm going to work to support him
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)And I suspect there are a lot more out there that feel like you do...and if they vote it will be a game changer.
Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)Bernie. His appeal is across all party lines. People know right off that socialist or not he is real and not just making campaign promises.
He's for us pure and simple.
Nice post arlington.mass! Welcome
delrem
(9,688 posts)Once sound progressive policies are enacted, they are supported across the board.
It becomes clear that the only ones who want to destroy those policies and programs are the same ones who stand to make a profit out of increasing human misery.
"make a profit out of increasing human misery" Isn't that what it is all about?
RiverNoord
(1,150 posts)It the weird reality that he seems to be a politician who actually seems to stand by what he says. This runs counter to the political gamesmanship that the American people have grown tediously used to for years and years.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)This should help make things crystal clear about your new forum chums my fine fellow DUer!
secondwind
(16,903 posts)CrispyQ
(40,988 posts)when their focus should be on the non-voters! It's a much bigger segment of the population & I believe with the right message, you can actually interest them, vs the undecideds, who I think are more about getting media attention. I mean really, Obama vs Romney & someone is undecided? Not buying it.
Glad you have you engaged again!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)meeting, I was surprised to find two people that I thought were strong Clinton supporters, were going to support Sanders in the primary. They both told me that they like Clinton but thought Sanders was bringing the Party back to the people.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)You had me going moobu2, for a minute there I thought you were serious.
MoveIt
(399 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I'm still lmao over here...picturing Bernie barefoot and nekkid except for a pair of overalls...tending to his pot plants...
neverforget
(9,514 posts)
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Stop it, I'm in tears...bwahahahaha!
WillyT
(72,631 posts)DFW
(60,256 posts)[URL=
.html][IMG]
[/IMG][/URL]
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)"People who live in communes are communISTS"
Archie Bunker
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And that's a bad thing, because?
edited to add: Damnit Scotty, you snuck that by me again. I didn't notice who wrote the post.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I can't remember the last time I laughed this hard.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)This isn't the 1980's. Jumping up and down and yelling commie just doesn't cut the mustard anymore with anyone who isn't a teabagger, and those loons view all Democrats that way regardless.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)The average American will love him for that.
It's Israel. Everybody except people on DU and Pacifica loves Israel.
That will be a plus for Bernie.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)You're flat wrong. The more people learn about Bernie, the more support he gets. This has been demonstrated.
quakerboy
(14,885 posts)I think we can beat them, no matter who we nominate.
I think that Bernie is the best choice, out of the available options.
The problem is really comparing things. The RW hates Clinton today. They dont know Bernie. And Hillary was again touted as invincible for nomination, so they are geared up to oppose her.
If we nominate Bernie instead, the RW will re-aim the lie machine and get to work.
That's how politics works now.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)and the mostly respect him, because he says what he means, means what
he says, and doesn't stab Congressional colleagues in the back. He's earned
this reputation honestly, and learned how to stand firmly for what he knows is
right, without resorting to nasty tricks.
That kind of POTUS, can get a lot of important stuff done that otherwise would
be fought tooth & nail, like happened to Hillary on health care, back in the day..
quakerboy
(14,885 posts)Whether individuals respect Bernie or not. Hell, he could change his entire platform to match the republican agenda exactly, and the RW machine would still go into smear mode if he gets the nomination.
Im for Bernie. But I dont even begin to imagine that the corporate powers would sit back and take that one quietly.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)"Bernie could change his entire platform to match" RWers, but they'd still ..." <--THIS
THIS^ will NOT happen with Bernie as POTUS. He's not an "aim low, then negotiate"
type of guy. Bernie is the FDR POTUS we've all been waiting for. His message is clear,
and unchanging. Hell he's been saying this stuff for decades now.
Bernie Calls-out Criminals Greenspan, Rubin, and Summers on illegal Bailouts - 1997 Classic
I DO agree -- like RWers did to Jimmy Carter -- that their noise machine will still be
turned on Bernie, even though many RWers may respect him as a person. That
just goes with the territory apparently anymore, unlike the days of Ike & Gerald Ford.
But the public is starting to see that for what it is, a toxic distraction from getting anything
useful or beneficial accomplished, and they do not like it one bit. Bernie can turn this
back onto itself, and he will.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Of course. But the RW has been aligned vs Bernie from the moment he announced -- coming out with memes like "Bernie doesn't care about PoC because only a rare few attended his announcement in Vermont", and we've seen what that was morphed into even on DU. Those are calculated RW attacks. "Rovian" - attack him on his strengths.
By the time Bernie Sanders wins the Dem nomination he'll have survived the very worst they can throw at him, and you had better believe it, the Republican party is probably the richest target on the planet and they'll be bewildered, scrambling to put together a platform of any kind out of the mess of their philosophy of absolute personal greed.
quakerboy
(14,885 posts)Im not certain.
I hope he makes it. Would be the best nominee in my lifetime, and the best president in 50 years or more.
sorechasm
(631 posts)I'm no mathematician, but that's a pretty sad reputation for the Bushes, though well deserved.
'Bern the Bushes!'
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Abrahamic.spontaneous. combustion event known as the Burning Bush)
jwirr
(39,215 posts)zentrum
(9,870 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)Gonna be an interesting evening and week thereafter.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)After the first debate between Kerry and Dubya, I told a friend, "Bush is going to find some way to postpone the other debates. He can't possibly survive another drubbing like the one he had tonight."
I was so naive.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)since 1 might be a fluke.
If Hillary comes off as looking contrived and Bernie comes off as looking sincere, two debates in a row... the game changes.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)... who tells me that Clinton will be practicing very hard to look more sincere and less contrived.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)...who tells me that Rick Perry will be practicing very hard to look smarter and more thoughtful.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)It's been a little tough going so far. But hey, it's still early.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)All of these things have roughly the same probability of success.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)no counting.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)But it's too early for polls to matter ...
Or, so we're told ... right before someone post an "OMG!!! HRC had better be a'shakin' in her boots" post ... showing, in reality, that she is ahead!
delrem
(9,688 posts)As people listen to the alternatives on the Dem side, it will be less "OMG, of course I support Hillary and not Trump", and more of a debate between Dems regarding the direction of their party. The "Hillary is the anointed one. Only Hillary can win." name recognition argument will be cast aside and Hillary Clinton will have to win on her actual history and plans for the future. Just like every other Dem candidate.
And every dirty trick that her campaign throws out at her competitors will come back and bite them on the ass.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)As best as I can tell, she is ... despite what you are hearing in this bubble.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)The Beltway is still convinced the electorate luvs Wall Street.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)I think it is about 3:44 in -- calling out on ambiguity
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)Or was it just bullshitters bullshitting the electorate?
What actually happened "on the ground", now the '08 election is over and Barrack Obama won?
Is it different than if Hillary Clinton won and the tax cap wasn't raised?
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)Refreshing to be able to vote for a candidate who's actually serious about those issues...
fbc
(1,668 posts)"Hillary Clinton is neither a liberal nor a true conservative. Rather, shes an electable Democratic candidate who leans to the right. Shes the Democratic version of Mitt Romney. President Hillary Clinton will be a conservative Barack Obama and a somewhat liberal George Bush. Shell bail out banks in another collapse and send ground troops to a foreign country in the event of a terror attack.
http://www.ringoffireradio.com/2015/07/ring-of-fires-official-position-on-bernie-and-hillary-because-you-asked/
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(19,172 posts)but it fits on a bumper sticker!
We need a thread to help the Big Brains of each campaign come up with short, pithy slogans that are easily transferable to bumper sticker-isms. Americans love pithy. The pithier the better.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)fbc
(1,668 posts)but it won't work.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)like getting people to run just to get the voter from Bernie it will not work at least not in the long run.
We are already furious at the DNC about favoring Hillary. If the party plays dirty politics to win this for Hillary the new and returning voters Bernie is bringing in will not take it. They are coming back because he is the real thing. If they suspect in anyway that he is being cheated - they will leave again.
But party heads are in such a bubble I doubt that they are going to see.
fbc
(1,668 posts)[img]
[/img]
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)is that it lacks actual substance. It's empty. For example, that same empty phrase can be applied to Jeb Bush. It could be applied to George W. Bush in '05. So it's meaningless.
hueymahl
(2,904 posts)fbc
(1,668 posts)The majority of democrats do not want a centrist candidate looking to work with republicans.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)congress for years without getting any major bills passed, yes, time has passed since 1991. What candidate is working for republicans? Working across the lines is accomplishing what Congress should be doing and not the do nothing congress.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)As for Congress not passing his bills. That is more about how corrupt and/or timid too many Democrats have been.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)"..will be good for you.......someday."
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)We still live in a corrupt and decaying pilitical system in which the Elite Status Quo holds all the cards, snd calls the shots, regardless of what is the best course for the majority of the population.
I have no illusions about who is likely to be the nominee.
But I cling to the hope that the forces of positive progressive populist change that Sanders represents will grow and push us in a better direction.
Big Vincenz
(16 posts)We shall see how "strong" she is.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Will Wall Street continue to have free reign over our economy? Will we continue with domestic spying on all Americans? Will we step up the continuous war in the Middle East? I think so if Clinton is elected.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)so it seems his bio is "Bernie pusher" as almost everything he's written about is Bernie.
Not a suprise either: the Puffington Host never respected the Clintons much, as a left-of-center magazine ought to.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)Thank you, WillyT, for your constant posts informing us and keeping it real!
PatrickforO
(15,441 posts)for sure. But we are.
The thing I worry about is during the general election he might get smothered with Koch brothers ads. That's when he'll need our help most.
McKim
(2,426 posts)This story from Huffington Post belongs in the supermarket tabloid rack. While I am a firm Senator Sanders supporter, I like to judge
politicians by their political actions. For me, Hillary Clinton voted for the Iraq War, end of story. She did not divorce Bill, end of story. Bill Clinton hurt the working class people and defended the banks and big corps. End of story. I like facts, not tawdry gossip.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)The Clintons raised taxes on the rich, and put people back to
work on higher wages.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)"Smutty?" I'm not following you on that. Can you expand on that idea?
rock
(13,218 posts)We run Bernie because the stupid Republicans don't know who he is and will therefore not come out to vote against him! Voila! We win.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,694 posts)Hillary has all kinds of material from her "scandalous past". Sure most of it is BS Fox News clap trap, but perception is everything in politics. She has done or been accused of doing or saying things that the right doesn't like, AND other things the left were not too enamored with.
Bernie has been a Senator for much longer and they still have nothing on him. The only thing they have is that he calls himself a "Democratic Socialist". And actually that is quite brilliant. As he has already played the "socialist" card on himself waaaaaaaaay before the GOP can do it. No matter how loud they scream "SOCIALIST!", he and most Americans will just yawn and say "...and?"
blackapron
(8 posts)willy t. is a rep. like crystal. they no Clinton will crush whoever. Bernie is a nice guy who cannot win. please read Barney Franks article about "Why" Sander should NOT run.
olddots
(10,237 posts)Vinca
(54,058 posts)People right, left and center appreciate the lack of BS.
Progressive dog
(7,604 posts)have been putting their money where their mouths are. Some of our money too.
PBass
(1,537 posts)(unless you need daily updates on what Howard Fineman thinks, what the Kardashians are doing, and Honey Boo Boo).
Everything quoted in the OP seems to be made-up "facts" - opinions masquerading as facts. They don't reflect the actual polling that I recall.
Seems like wishful thinking is fueling "the Bern".
PBass
(1,537 posts)The media wants a horse race. Beware of investing too heavily in articles that make the early polling seem tight. Hillary has massive name recognition, and is one of the most popular politicians in America (even though the white male author might not realize that). Yeah, she has high negatives, and her approval rating is not that high. Except almost every other politician polls worse than that. So relatively speaking, her numbers are strong.
On the other hand, Bernie Sanders is almost completely unknown on the national level.