2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy isn't Hillary holding public rallies?
Addressing big, enthusiastic crowds would show her popularity and lay waste to the rumors of the silly notion of her "impending demise."
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)and see if it will fly.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Likewise, the Clinton campaign has much of its ground game in place, and does not need to attract and motivate volunteers to the extent that other candidates do.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)The objective is to win the GE, which is a long time a way. She's got a huge lead in the primary, and voters already know her. Raising money and meeting with smaller groups might be more effective than holding big rallies when the general is still over a year away.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Because D. W. Griffith, Cecil B. de Mille, William Wyler, and Richard Attenborough are all dead perhaps?

rusty fender
(3,428 posts)Dismissing opposition in the Primary reminds me of college football teams that overlook the little college team they have to beat before the BIG game against Notre Dame.
Yes, everyone has heard of her, but large public displays of support will help her win the primary, in my humble opinion.
Cosmocat
(15,424 posts)double where Bernie is ...
She has a LOT more to lose by extending herself at this point than gain.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)all downside unless she can draw zillions.
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)She has the poll numbers for the most part.
If she can get the TV time in low risk situations, why bother?
My guess is if her team thinks she needs to, she will. Where you are at from a poll perspective dictates strategy, IMO.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I'd wager she can draw a large crowd, but it might appear more like a convention of sleepy hedge fund accountants.
HRC, with the lack of enthusiasm within the party, all the baggage, and the pretty obvious signals that she is a corporate candidate means she is the GOP's best chance of taking the White House by rallying their base of anti-Clinton yahoos, lackluster GOTV efforts and the usual bag of dirty tricks.
Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)So yes, that is totally the audience she got when she was at Roosevelt Island.
Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)Because that's what was being said. NOT THE SIZE of the crowd.
To reference, you said, "I'd wager she can draw a large crowd, but it might appear more like a convention of sleepy hedge fund accountants."
So we talked about the crowd. Not the size.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)That's about right.
Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)But it's more pity.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Made me smile.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251519866
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)She has nothing to gain - she's counting on buying the election with her war chest.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)Rufus, I would respond in kind with the same level of snark, condescension, contempt, and disingenuousness but I don't want to suffer the same fate of my friends on this board who have had posts hidden and received time outs for much less...
Vinca
(53,994 posts)And I don't think she would.
Qutzupalotl
(15,824 posts)There would be comparisons, number to number, and they probably wouldn't be in Cinton's favor.
She is pretty good on the stump, but there is far more enthusiasm on the Sanders side.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/14/1054604/-Rahm-Caught-Red-Handed-By-State-Officials?via=siderec
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Spontaneous speeches are not really her strong suit. Especially unscripted questions.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Too many people worry about minor things...
Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)[img]
[/img]
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)no need to be so mean about it.
JI7
(93,617 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)He's great with small settings, large settings, anywhere he can haul out his conviction and good natured common sense.
frylock
(34,825 posts)
yurbud
(39,405 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)oasis
(53,694 posts)are willing to steer her campaign towards any idea floated by the DU Think Tank. Not just yet anyway.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)And without reading the rest of this thread, I'll also guess that others will wildly speculate.
BooScout
(10,410 posts)...and right now she is focusing on the issues and raising money not just for her own upcoming campaign in the GE, but for Democrats across the country who will also be running for various offices. See Hillary is a Democrat not just in name only to use the system like Sanders is....she is using her name and status as the FRONT RUNNER to raise funds for a lot of Dems and a lot of races nationwide. How much has Sanders raised for other Democrats?
Ino
(3,366 posts)BooScout
(10,410 posts)Do keep up.
Ino
(3,366 posts)My bad
gollygee
(22,336 posts)She doesn't want to take a chance with any unknowns. (Such as a BLM protest, but there are other potential unknowns too.) It's a conservative way to campaign, but so long as she stays in the front, it might work. If Sanders keeps catching up, maybe she'll start planning some big rallies. She might be banking on having more TV news coverage too.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)She's not the best public speaker.