2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumUncomfortable, Isn't It ??? - When The Shoe Is On The Other Foot...
How Hillary Let Down #BlackLivesMatterThe movement is looking for a candidate who intuitively understands the struggles facing black Americans. And so far, Clinton is coming up short.

Barrett Holmes Pitner - DailyBeast
08.18.153:35 PM ET
Link: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/18/how-hillary-let-down-blacklivesmatter.html
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)Made it uncomfortable. They only have themselves to blame.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)We all make mistakes and I hope we learn from this.
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)I stand with #BlackLivesMatter
And--I knew this was coming. It was the conspiracy theorists who thought different
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)They are empowered activists, and my hope is this is just the beginning for them.
SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)Embarrassing.
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)Made me cringe.
Number23
(24,544 posts)EVERYONE.
I think a few folks in this forum are trying to re-write history. These folks, who have denied the really ugly and even racist stuff against #BLM, and denied who was doing it by putting everyone they disagreed with on ignore and running to high five every single thread that said what they wanted to hear -- that the stuff about Sanders supporters were "talking points" (and this was even after Van Jones, Occupy, Thom Hartmann, every person on Black Twitter and damn near every Kos diarist in existence called these folks out) are embarassed as hell right now. Or at least, the smarter and more honest ones probably are.
And they damn well should be.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)I didn't see them yelling and shutting down any of her rallies.
When are they gonna do that? It seemed to be such an admired tactic.
Number23
(24,544 posts)And the fact that two sisters rattled Sanders so much that he had to leave the stage is on him, not on them.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)-- stood there while two women, crazier than shit-house rats, shouted on the stage wanting to be heard. They were offered the platform but kept on demanding to be heard. .... one thinks she is a Republican operative.
They should have been arrested but if they were, Bernie would have been tarred with the racist brush.
jfern
(5,204 posts)they probably would have just called the cops on them
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)We will see what a room full of them will do soon enough. Liberty U is right around the corner.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)I'm sure BS thanks you for your support.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Jeez.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)One exchange was calm and invited dialog. The other showed two agitated women who jumped on stage, shouting, charging the microphone with arms flailing. As a result, people who came to hear Sanders, were deprived of their opportunity to hear and maybe learn something because two people thought what they had to say AND WHEN THEY GOT TO SAY IT, was more important than the right of people to hear Sanders. Nursery school sandbox, anyone?
One woman was not quite so animated and out of control. But the other was, and is, likely in need of professional help. The latter then goes on to profess how the Republican Party missed their chance to "groom" her. I agree the Teabagger Caucus of the Republican Party probably did miss a great opportunity to use her as an example of why their racist beliefs make sense. Beyond that (Palin button aside,) I doubt, despite her delusions, the Republican Party has need of her services.
I believe she would be diagnosed as mentally ill. The other is close behind but working to catch up.
Or does this bring up the position that any actions and behaviors of aggrieved parties is justified because of the way they perceive societal injustices? S.D.S., Mark Rudd, S.L.A., Westboro Church, all believed their behavior was/is fine because society was fucked up.
--- hope this helps.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)zappaman
(20,627 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)You are one of the people who desperately needs to get the message.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)"They should have been arrested but if they were, Bernie would have been tarred with the racist brush."
With comments like this from his "supporters" it's a wonder he hasn't been.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)It's a good thing he ISN'T like some of the people who support him.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Do you read what you post? Do you see the hate? The vitriol?
It's not healthy.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Welcome back btw.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)And it's still crap.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,847 posts)Maybe if you and Trump are successful in adding a Constitutional amendment to supersede the 14th Amendment you can have their citizenship revoked and send them to god knows where.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)Spazito
(55,482 posts)and not your first in this regard.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Absurd.
And he left because the issue that was to be discussed wasn't being discussed....and he didn't leave early, know. (maybe you don't). O'Malley left as well.
And I guess this also means, since Hillary hasn't had a "rally" yet, comparing these events is like comparing apples and oranges.
Number23
(24,544 posts)You are so knee jerk defensive to all things Sanders that your posts are often intelligible and what is understandable is often beyond wrong and ridiculous.
Sanders left the stage in Seattle. That is IRREFUTABLE. O'Malley DID NOT leave the stage at Netroots. That is IRREFUTABLE. All the rest of your post is just needless noise.
At this point, it would be great if you just stayed out of threads re: BLM altogether but since I know that won't happen, if you could just stop responding to me, I'd be beyond appreciative.
MADem
(135,425 posts)She meets with smaller groups, she listens, she takes questions.
She doesn't stand up in front of a massive group, "transmit," wave and leave.
It's just a different style. It works better for her. And why yell/shut down when she's more than willing to talk?
They're not done with her, I'm sure. They're not done with any of the candidates. This is their window of opportunity, and they are gonna make the most of it. I can't say as I blame them.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Before or after the $1000 fundraiser dinners?
MADem
(135,425 posts)And there's nothing wrong with that.
You do what the market will bear--or did you think that campaigns run on Love and Pale Moonlight? Someone has to pay to rent the hall, hire the lighting and sound crew, etc.
And television ads cost money. People without money are not heard.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)And if #BLM doesn't believe that Hillary has answered their questions to their satisfaction, you better believe she will know about it.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)one with hillary way more. it was raw moment. not orchestrated. i thought the point excellent that the man stated. i tend toward that type of thinking too.
i thought it was better cause we actually got to hear an interaction and hear what blm had to say.
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)The thing is, I WANT #BLM to continue what they do--hold everyone's feet to the fire. It's activism at its best--and they are being heard.
Nobody gets a pass.
betsuni
(29,075 posts)Like others have said here, this shouldn't be difficult to understand.
Number23
(24,544 posts)about every damn thing and that everyone who disagreed with their omniscience was their enemy that needed to immediately be tossed on ignore for the gigantic crime of trying to educate them about things they were CLEARLY WRONG AND KNEW NOTHING ABOUT had been spent actually fucking listening, they wouldn't be so incredibly embarassed about how they've made themselves look to the ENTIRE WORLD for the last month or so.
betsuni
(29,075 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)I think it was the disruptions that made it uncomfortable.
That and the GOP lying memes that started the whole "Sanders doesn't care".... an out and out lie.
But this "you tell me" bit is just a type of pandering.
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts).
No one mentions that at least one of the women laid their hand on Sanders too.
These are things that Hillary Clinton and her people did not have to encounter.
I'm sure the presence of the Secret Service helped to keep things in order.
In what was supposedly a 5 minute speech, turned into a 20 minute co-option leading to Sander's leaving.
Gee, I wonder why the people in the audience were annoyed after being told they are racists.
.
He has every earthly right to his opinion. I have no problem with him having one. I do hope that others have a different opinion. I thought the video should wind up helping her, but this is a literal case of what the heck do I know.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i have my thoughts on them and expressed, but i really want to hear from blm and others.
no. it is not uncomfortable at all. it is fuckin kick ass in conversation.
it was a huge step further in further understanding.
this just is not very hard.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I think we would have to delve into the ops addmitance of being previously uncomfortable in order to see why it's is so difficult for some.
For most, you are dead on. Aside from the ops admittance, and the one size fits all aspect of the write up, it was worth the read and I'm sure he isn't alone in his thoughts.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i was enjoy the thought of remembering what was said and the exchange and thinking about that.
i see... probably not his title, either. another of my bad. geeez, is media just piss poor anymore? lol. so unprofessional.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)While I'm shaking my head in disbelief, I believe it's the ops title. I didn't see it in the article.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Via their twitter feed:
https://twitter.com/BLM_Boston/with_replies
Julius Jones of @BLM_Boston on NH mtg w Clinton: "She was ducking personal responsibility for her role in mass incarceration." #maddow
BlackLivesMatterBOS @BLM_Boston 23h23 hours ago
As of today, the platform on her website still calls for "restoring balance to the CJ system. #HollupHillary
BlackLivesMatterBOS @BLM_Boston 23h23 hours ago
That's an inaccurate portrayal of the system, which has never had balance & was *designed* to disenfranchise Black folks. #HollupHillary
Hillary has also repeatedly called for more police & tougher prison sentences. #HollupHillary http://reason.com/blog/2014/12/05/hillary-clinton-response-eric-garner#.v4oydm:mMdg
#HollupHillary: HRC worked to reduce federal assistance to women & children living in poverty.
HRC lobbied to expand drug war & mass incarceration in ways that still impact black & brown ppl today. #HollupHillary
HRC's policies are far-reaching, & negatively affect Black & brown people OUTSIDE the US as well. #HollupHillary
In Dec 2014, HRC claimed our CJ system was "out of balance." #HollupHillary http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clinton-takes-hard-truths-about-race-and-justice
That's an inaccurate portrayal of the system, which has never had balance & was *designed* to disenfranchise Black folks. #HollupHillary
As FLOTUS, Senator, & Secretary of State, HRC had more influence than most on policies that led 2 systemic oppression of POC. #HollupHillary
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and say yup.... you are right on. our bad. we need to fix that, and here is how i see it.
she does see the need to fix, and she has put it out in her speech. these are raw moments. no one, even me who is really good at conversing, is gonna get these raw moments hands down.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Interesting how open you are about feeling personally uncomfortable over something that happened to Sanders. A real bit of unintended retrospective there. That addmitance is the only way your title would work.
I have to go tweet all of my black friends and tell them how they are wrong, and how they should vote for HRC, because she is what is in their best interest.
sigh, again, this is not about HRC, BS, O'M. or any of our candidates, personally.
It's a movement with a very important and strong message, and that message needs to be heard by all.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)why is that concept so hard?
and, speaking of, when i heard the tape a day or so ago, maybe last night? the second part where he is saying whites have to own, and change heart. i got what he was saying. clintons reaction? the lawyer mind and who she is? i got her reaction. pish posh, waste of time trying to change bigots hearts.
yet... i stand with the dude. NOoooooo. i want to change hearts. so, it was very interesting to me.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)bizarre to me that it's turned into a very strange contest about which candidate was disrespected more. It's just so crazy.
I agree, it was a very interesting exchange. And it's a conversation we all need to keep having. That is the only way to begin much needed change. And yes, I hope many hearts are changed in the process, but sadly, I agree that not all hearts will change. Especially since so many don't even seem to understand it, and are unwilling to listen.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Just listen. Don't offer your own ideas, and certainly don't try to counter anything you disagree with. Our job is to be quiet and listen...to an idiot who was a Sarah Palin fan not very long ago. But that doesn't matter. Those of us who support Sander(s) have been given this same advice. My gift to you is to pass this advice along.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)part yet. my gift to you.... listening is our friend.
try on someone else.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Anything beyond that is whitesplaining.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)This is getting to be pure gold.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I have to wonder if you sprained something with the thought process employed in your reply to Sea.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)that is LONG overdue for national discussion!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i mean... i LOVE that blm is out there. protesting didnt work. they were arrested as a bunch of white men carried guns and hung out with cops.
i say....
they are kick ass and has people on their toes and talking. that is good for all of us, as a whole, and individually, i am learning so damn much.
makes us a better people.
just jazzed.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I know many would disagree strongly but I think all of our contenders are extremely respectable candidates. That field includes one of the most respected and influential woman in the world.
BLM isn't even looking at republicans in any meaningful way. If the reality weren't so devastating, that in itself is a point to be proud of.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i agree with you totally.
repugs just really are not a part of this election, lol. it is all about dem power.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)He was talking about Hillary disagreeing with BLM. When Sanders did that, you and a handful of others were all over this board screaming "whitesplaining". I haven't seen your or anyone else's numerous posts about how Hillary doing the same. But I'm sure I will come upon them eventually.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)clinton, supporters or otherwise agree with blm and LISTENED to blm and support blm.
see a difference?
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)they continually miss this point. It's critical.
His supporters showed their behinds but good, they made a bad situation exponentially worse and continue to do so.
For some reason they just don't want to talk about that.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)to run his campaign. everyone was blamed for sanders being called on not campaigning on social justice and just economic equality.
sanders has stood on one position for 4 decades. economic equality. he CHOSE to run a campaign on economic equality. it is not EVERYONES fault because people of all stripe called out sanders for only campaigning on economic equality.
sanders gets to own it. he purposely took the risk. good and bad. the good?
he is reaching out to repugs, teabaggers, libertarians, populist, independent and a small faction of democratic party.
they bad? it is not talking to the democratic base he is running under.
quit blaming EVERYONE for a choice sanders made.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)It is only whitesplaining when Bernie's supporters (not Bernie himself) argue with BLM.
When Hillary argues with BLM, it is listening. When Hillary outright states she is not going to talk with BLM on AA issues anymore, that is listenning. Really?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and we in this thread support him whether a clinton supporter or not. now.... a lot of sander supporters want to make ALL of us clinton supporters. i am not a clinton supporter. now i am standing with omalley. so i feel the constant need to clarify, because not all of us in this thread are clitnon supporters and that is being assumed.
" Hillary herself disagrees with BLM," the black man speaking tells her to not tell them what to do
we support blm. blm write a critique how they see the meeting went.
we support blm.
what do you want?
"When Hillary argues with BLM, it is listening." now you are merely creating your own story to be told.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)So we can read it and gain a better understanding along with our candidates. I hate to see things like this cheapened with the ad lib headline. It was good on its own.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The headline contains your words, correct?
WillyT
(72,631 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)"Uncomfortable, Isn't It ??? - When The Shoe Is On The Other Foot..."
Very personally illuminating.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,847 posts)eom
Spazito
(55,482 posts)hence the addition of the flamebait one in this header.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)it took this long for them to come up with a headline based in admittance they have been feeling uncomfortable. I will use the short term for duplicate as a double entendre. Dupe.
Spazito
(55,482 posts)saves time for one thing, lol.
betsuni
(29,075 posts)The poor quote was dragged out half a dozen times, it wouldn't go away. Turn around, there's the quote standing behind you. Wake up in the middle of the night, the quote is staring at you. That was uncomfortable.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Look in your car's rear view mirror, there is the quote sitting in the backseat.
But yes, I am for BLM issues before a particular candidate's feelings. They are politicians. They can take BLM tactics.
Response to betsuni (Reply #67)
Post removed
Spazito
(55,482 posts)I swear when my cat meows it sounds like that quote!
MADem
(135,425 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,847 posts)If I were a supporter of the other candidate I would make denigrating comments about him but we Hillary Clinton supporters hold ourselves to a higher standard.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,847 posts)hootinholler
(26,451 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,847 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
riversedge
(80,805 posts)It shuts down discussion.
Enough said.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Have fun.
Triangulation 101 goes horribly wrong. People involved pretend nothing happened.
rocktivity
(45,006 posts)into actual solutions, thank you very much.
rocktivity
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)What exactly are you fishing for here?
I just looked, and I don't see any mega threads with the vile name-calling and sniping at BLM from Hillary supporters.
Nope, nadda.
What's your point?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)They have been feeling uncomfortable about the topic and think that same feeling they have had can simply be transferred to others. What they don't get is that uncomfortable feeling they had is very personal to them, therefore they don't comprehend it isn't simply transferable to others. Really is an amazingly bold personal statement they made.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)now and it's really obvious they genuinely expected for the HRC crowd to do the same when the shoe was on the other foot. Didn't happen. AT ALL.
And it's beyond obvious that the only people "uncomfortable" right now are more than a few Sanders supporters who have shown the world who they really are and are obviously embarassed as hell about that. And they should be.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,847 posts)That is because HRC supporters have street smarts. Why should/ would HRC and her supporters pick a fight with black folks?
Fearless
(18,458 posts)But Bernie... I don't believe him, so he doesn't.
Sounds like a personal issue to me.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)'support Sanders' but because of your own personal reaction to them. You spent the Spring on DU posting 'Civil Rights Don't Really matter, it's all the money' and hearing from many people why that is not really a sufficient set of language and you would have none of it. Your very own mindset is the mindset being so specifically called out.
You can't say you were not warned by your peers who tried to steer you toward a higher path.
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)You ever slap your dog in the wrong shoe? Toes get all bent up and shit.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)care to explain it?
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)They really *aren't* controlled by Soros.
MADem
(135,425 posts)DARN~~~!!!!!
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)How to completely make a slick Soros-funded false-flag out of nervous activists who are actually--um, Black people who say that they want police to stop killing them? This place.
Buzz cook
(2,899 posts)"Intuitive"? WTF does a candidate have to be a mind reader, or is communing with the sweet baby JeZuZ enough?
Here's my take away, BLM asked for definitive answers to a problem that has not been closed to a solution since the end of the Civil War. When Clinton said BLM should come up with its own proposals they accused her of white splaining.
Clinton responded with a bit too much snark, but snark was an appropriate response.
BLM does need to tell the candidates what they want and how they want it done. Leaving this shit to the politicians is a sure route to more of the same.
If you look at the various popular movements from the progressives forward, once they lined up behind a presidential candidate they got lots of promises and nothing else.
It is up to the candidates to line up behind the movement and they can only do that if they are given a clear, workable agenda.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i tend to be more successful with people that understand because they see so many of the tentacles that cause so many of the issues. that matters.
if i have a choice of a pres, i am gonna chose the one that i feel understands the issues the best and will actually be an advocate while in office. not told to address because they simply do not recognize an issue.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Willy, I think we have learned a lot about H supporters from this OP. Take it in and move on. Bernie got good crowds today in Reno!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)But thanks for playing!!
artislife
(9,497 posts)But thanks for playing!!!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)S/he didn't get it. So I was pointing out that none of you felt the way s/he thought you would. NONE. That is what was revealing.
The responses all seemed to be 100% behind H in everything she does. That's not what s/he thought the crowd might take from this.
I wasn't as surprised, though. You are super supporters. No matter what.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i knew you would give it to us eventually
artislife
(9,497 posts)I didn't read a wavering response in this thread, did you?
But I should follow my own advice and let it go.
c ya
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I have had some experiences with that poster and I do believe they can see both sides of the issue fairly.
I wouldn't jump down their throat.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)"responses all seemed to be 100% behind H in everything she does."
how could one be legitimately confused on such an obvious error?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)So I'm not sure but I haven't seen overt anger/hatred from that poster as I have seen from others.
I think we all understand what's at stake here, and how important this issue is in 2016... It's just interesting to see how we all handle it differently.
Not sure there is a right or wrong way... The only thing I am sure of is that dismissal of the issue because of the way it's brought up won't work for anyone in the long run.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)kinda like, she too, does not feel it is a deal and went elsewhere for conversation.
that is cool.
and ya..... i just think this is an exciting time, and i think that is something the THREE of us would agree on. we all hands down respect like and support what blm is doing.
NOW.... i am done. thanks ags.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Hillary can handle it, she can craft a plan of action, issue course corrections as needed, and We, The People will--all of us-- be better for it at the end of the day. And if she's coming up short, she needs to work on that.
Look, you can like a candidate and you can also understand that yes, indeedy, BLACK LIVES MATTER.
We've got to fix this. 1865 was a LONG time ago, and we haven't lived up to our promise as a nation.
Not sure what the
is about--we need to get to work. No point in being defensive and whiney--let's get going.
betsuni
(29,075 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Odd post WillyT.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Response to WillyT (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)That's the interesting part, we just don't understand the post?
How and why does BLM make WillyT uncomfortable...
I don't think he got the reaction he wanted with this OP, but that happens sometimes.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)The whole subthread goes poof!
I think it's funny that so many people on ignore can create such an amazingly 'alternate' reality! Oh well, I guess it works, in a way!
MADem
(135,425 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)Response to Metric System (Reply #132)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,847 posts)This thread would only have worked if Clinton supporters were cretinous enough to take the bait and say libelous things about Black Lives Matter and black folks but alas they didn't.
![]()
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Hillary has work to do. No one is owed the black vote. I will probably vote for HRC in my primary. I'm not uncomfortable. I have no emotional ties to HRC and my identity is not dependent on who is the dem nominee. So, if blm is not satisfied with the candidates they confront, it doesn't make me uncomfortable. Black people are being killed, this is no time for politics as usual.
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)I stand with BLM.
Politicians need to get with the program.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)...that we will no longer settle for a seat at her table when she decides that we are organized enough."
BAM.
romanic
(2,841 posts)Who will BLM activists vote for if neither of the Dem candidates are "good enough"? Will they then advocate not to vote at all?
MelungeonWoman
(502 posts)By any means necessary except the most practical one.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)When the Democratic Party is complicit in pushing policies that directly attack the black community - such as the Welfare Reform Act, and the private prison industry - then it is meet and right that they say "enough - don't expect our votes, EARN OUR VOTES."
I advocate this approach for the broader Progressive movement as a whole.
BeyondGeography
(41,101 posts)And when they brought up Bill's law-and-order policies which brought disproportionate pain to young black men, she said, you can put that guilt trip away now.
She is:
-very tough
-a lot territorial
-a little cold
-politically wiser than most, including the people she was talking to
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)She dodged the thrust of his question. She would not acknowledge the role of both Clintons in the bi-partisan "Southern Strategy," i.e. the political war on black people in America.
At least she apologized for her vote on Iraq. As long as she believes she has a chance at the White House, she will NEVER apologize for her disgraceful role in black incarceration. This, in my view is another reason she is unqualified to be the Democratic nominee.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and I still don't get what you mean?
BainsBane
(57,757 posts)Why should I be uncomfortable?