2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum26 Democratic primary debates in 2008. Ask yourself why so few now.
5.1 April 26, 2007 Orangeburg, South Carolina, South Carolina State University
5.2 June 3, 2007 - CNN 7:00pm EDT - Goffstown, New Hampshire, Saint Anselm College
5.3 June 28, 2007 - PBS - Washington, D.C., Howard University
5.4 July 12, 2007Detroit, Michigan
5.5 July 23, 2007 - CNN - Charleston, South Carolina, The Citadel military college
5.6 August 4, 2007 Chicago, Illinois
5.7 August 7, 2007 Chicago, Illinois
5.8 August 9, 2007 Los Angeles, California
5.9 August 19, 2007 Des Moines, Iowa
5.10 September 9, 2007 Coral Gables, Florida, University of Miami
5.11 September 12, 2007
5.12 September 20, 2007 Davenport, Iowa
5.13 September 26, 2007 Hanover, New Hampshire, Dartmouth College
5.14 October 30, 2007 - NBC 9:00pm EDT - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Drexel University
5.15 November 15, 2007 - CNN - Las Vegas, Nevada
5.16 December 4, 2007 - NPR (radio only) - Des Moines, Iowa
5.17 December 13, 2007 Johnston, Iowa
5.18 January 5, 2008 - ABC 8:45pm EST - Goffstown, New Hampshire, Saint Anselm College
5.19 January 15, 2008 - MSNBC 6:00pm PST - Las Vegas, Nevada, College of Southern Nevada
5.20 January 21, 2008 - CNN 8:00pm EST - Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
5.21 January 31, 2008 - CNN 5:00pm PDT - Hollywood, California
5.22 February 2, 2008 - MTV 6:00pm EST - MTV Myspace Debate
5.23 February 21, 2008 - CNN 7:00pm CST - Austin, Texas, University of Texas at Austin
5.24 February 26, 2008 - MSNBC 9:00pm EST - Cleveland, Ohio, Cleveland State University
5.25 April 13, 2008 - CNN 8:00pm EDT - Grantham, Pennsylvania, Messiah College
5.26 April 16, 2008 - ABC 8:00pm EDT - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_debates,_2008
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)A candidate who needs to be "protected" is a weak candidate.
Uncle Joe
(65,303 posts)the powers that be in the Democratic Party believed in the power of their ideas in 2008.
Thanks for the thread, L0oniX.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)All those "undecided" folks watch the debates from both the Rs and the Ds, to help them decide. The more we can get the D message out, the better.
Fearless
(18,458 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Fearless
(18,458 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Fearless
(18,458 posts)Renew Deal
(85,273 posts)And I mean none that were fully running. Some had exploratory committees. So that pushed everything back a little. But there is no reason we couldn't have August debates.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)is that sexist of me?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)I guess you can't really have a male chicken -- wouldn't that be a rooster?
BWAWK!
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I have hardly ever been so embarrassed of the DNC as I am now.
Their action to limit democracy is shameful and anyone who supports that decision should be likewise ashamed.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Spazito
(55,717 posts)PRESS RELEASES from the Democratic National Committee
For Immediate Release
May 16, 2007
Contact: Karen Finney, Stacie Paxton
DNC ANNOUNCES DATES, MEDIA SPONSORS AND LOCATIONS FOR SANCTIONED DEBATES
Washington, DC - The Democratic National Committee in partnership with six state parties today announced the dates, media sponsors and cities for the six DNC sanctioned debates. Additional details regarding specifics for the individual debates including additional media partners and logistics will be announced at a later time. The DNC sanctioned debate schedule will be:
DNC SANCTIONED DEBATES:
July 23, 2007: YouTube/Google and CNN* in Charleston, SC
August 19, 2007: ABC in Des Moines, IA
September 26, 2007: NBC News/MSNBC** in Hanover, NH
October 30, 2007: NBC News/MSNBC** in Philadelphia, PA
November 15, 2007: CNN* in Las Vegas, NV
December 10, 2007: CBS in Los Angeles, CA
"Our strong field of Democratic candidates have been working hard, talking about the issues the American people care about and laying out a positive vision for Americas future," said DNC Chairman Howard Dean. "We are grateful to the media sponsors and our state parties for their role in providing important, diverse settings for the American people to hear directly from our candidates."
*Debate will be simulcast on CNN en Espanol.
**Telemundo will re-broadcast both debates.
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2008/primdeb08/dnc040507pr.html
I believe that is the same number announced for this primary as well.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Candidates could debate as much as they chose. The DNC wasnt trying to force the candidates not to debate. Thanks for bringing that up.
Spazito
(55,717 posts)a gaping loophole I am sure will be used. I do find the exclusivity clause, such as it is, to be ridiculous and serving no one including the candidates.
"There is a loophole, of sorts. While the extra debates are forbidden, the DNCs rules welcome additional candidate forums, where contenders speak back-to-back from the same stage, but do not engage directly with each other.
Im sure there will be plenty of other forums for the candidates to make their case to voters, and that they will make the most out of every opportunity, the DNCs Schulman said. The party will happily facilitate those type of events, but is prepared to crack down on unofficial events."
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/liberal-group-latest-call-more-democratic-debates
bunnies
(15,859 posts)That makes the whole thing even more absurd. I really dont understand what theyre trying to accomplish.
Spazito
(55,717 posts)There are less 'fireworks' to be sure as they are more issue oriented rather than personality oriented. I like both formats for different reasons and a good mix of both is of benefit, imo.
The candidates will be interacting with each other on six 'sanctioned' debates so there is that, whether that will be enough, it's too early to tell, imo.
I think the DNC is making a mistake re having an exclusivity clause even though they have also written in the big loophole along with it.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Why in the world should they care if the candidates want to debate more than 6 times? And sadly, only 4 will come before IA and NH. Its pretty pathetic really.
I would *love* it if all the candidates said "to hell with the sanctioned debates". And attended as many debates, sponsored by whomever, whenever they wanted. I'd be willing to bet Sanders and O'Malley would do it. The others... I'd guess not so much.
Spazito
(55,717 posts)It is, after all, the silly season and will remain so for a while yet.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Cherry Creek Native
(55 posts).....which she will never get. She will be either primaried or put in a much lesser role after Bernie's victory.
Response to frylock (Reply #19)
Post removed
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)ellisonz
(27,776 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)So instead of lots of debates, we have almost none.
Broward
(1,976 posts)With Hillary as the nominee, they can't lose.
HFRN
(1,469 posts)the nerve of some people....just don't know their place
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I have never heard an HRC say anything even remotely like that. Why the strawman?
HFRN
(1,469 posts)no, she leaves that to her supporters
Because like I said, I have never seen any HRC supporter say anything remotely like that. Why the strawman?

MaggieD
(7,393 posts)The strawman is yours, I am afraid.
BlueStateLib
(937 posts)and 2007 there were 11 democratic primary candidates, 2015 is a three person race.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)for the exclusivity rule.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts).... so I will just repeat. 6 is plenty.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)If Hillary performs in the first couple like she did at the Iowa dinner, it won't be her supporters who'll be calling for a halt.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)but they haven't.

Zorra
(27,670 posts)They would rather see Donald Trump in the WH than Bernie Sanders.
Because Trump will assist them in maintaining oligarchy, and maintaining oligarchy is clearly the primary function of the DNC.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Between Oligarchy and Socialism. Most of us would prefer neither. That's why Clinton is the best choice.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Comedy gold.
Sid
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)6chars
(3,967 posts)Autumn
(48,978 posts)Off the cuff speaking is difficult for her sometimes and that's where she screws up.