Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 12:07 PM Aug 2015

26 Democratic primary debates in 2008. Ask yourself why so few now.

5.1 April 26, 2007 – Orangeburg, South Carolina, South Carolina State University
5.2 June 3, 2007 - CNN 7:00pm EDT - Goffstown, New Hampshire, Saint Anselm College
5.3 June 28, 2007 - PBS - Washington, D.C., Howard University
5.4 July 12, 2007–Detroit, Michigan
5.5 July 23, 2007 - CNN - Charleston, South Carolina, The Citadel military college
5.6 August 4, 2007 – Chicago, Illinois
5.7 August 7, 2007 – Chicago, Illinois
5.8 August 9, 2007 – Los Angeles, California
5.9 August 19, 2007 – Des Moines, Iowa
5.10 September 9, 2007 – Coral Gables, Florida, University of Miami
5.11 September 12, 2007
5.12 September 20, 2007 – Davenport, Iowa
5.13 September 26, 2007 – Hanover, New Hampshire, Dartmouth College
5.14 October 30, 2007 - NBC 9:00pm EDT - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Drexel University
5.15 November 15, 2007 - CNN - Las Vegas, Nevada
5.16 December 4, 2007 - NPR (radio only) - Des Moines, Iowa
5.17 December 13, 2007 – Johnston, Iowa
5.18 January 5, 2008 - ABC 8:45pm EST - Goffstown, New Hampshire, Saint Anselm College
5.19 January 15, 2008 - MSNBC 6:00pm PST - Las Vegas, Nevada, College of Southern Nevada
5.20 January 21, 2008 - CNN 8:00pm EST - Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
5.21 January 31, 2008 - CNN 5:00pm PDT - Hollywood, California
5.22 February 2, 2008 - MTV 6:00pm EST - MTV Myspace Debate
5.23 February 21, 2008 - CNN 7:00pm CST - Austin, Texas, University of Texas at Austin
5.24 February 26, 2008 - MSNBC 9:00pm EST - Cleveland, Ohio, Cleveland State University
5.25 April 13, 2008 - CNN 8:00pm EDT - Grantham, Pennsylvania, Messiah College
5.26 April 16, 2008 - ABC 8:00pm EDT - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_debates,_2008

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
26 Democratic primary debates in 2008. Ask yourself why so few now. (Original Post) L0oniX Aug 2015 OP
It's not for our benefit, that's for damned sure. They're protecting Hillary. winter is coming Aug 2015 #1
That's a good question, I believe it's because Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #2
And people forget that our debates don't only reach Democratic primary voters... cyberswede Aug 2015 #3
When Hillary talks people run away. Fearless Aug 2015 #4
Yes, it wouldn't be an anti-Hillary thread without a gratuitous insult. brooklynite Aug 2015 #14
Nor would it be a joke without a killjoy. Fearless Aug 2015 #17
If it makes you feel better, I wouldn't lob a joke at Bernie Sanders either... brooklynite Aug 2015 #22
Go for it! Fearless Aug 2015 #27
There were basically no announced candidates on April 1. Renew Deal Aug 2015 #5
the whole DNC is chicken. nashville_brook Aug 2015 #6
I don't see how. Why would it be? NCTraveler Aug 2015 #9
Is it ... a female chicken? DirkGently Aug 2015 #13
i guess i could give you a hen..t nashville_brook Aug 2015 #34
Uhm that would be a hen. Right? L0oniX Aug 2015 #47
Eggsackly. DirkGently Aug 2015 #53
Don't get cocky awoke_in_2003 Aug 2015 #54
it is very poultry of you! Kip Humphrey Aug 2015 #29
i know, i've been cooped up all day! nashville_brook Aug 2015 #35
Embarrassing RobertEarl Aug 2015 #7
K & R !!! WillyT Aug 2015 #8
K&R Go Vols Aug 2015 #10
On May 16, 2007, the DNC announced the SIX sanctioned debates... Spazito Aug 2015 #11
There was no exclusivity clause last time. bunnies Aug 2015 #15
Interesting, debates have been limited but forums have not... Spazito Aug 2015 #16
So the purpose then, is to strictly limit the candidates interaction with one another? bunnies Aug 2015 #18
Forums do have their place as well... Spazito Aug 2015 #20
I agree with you re: the exclusivity clause. bunnies Aug 2015 #21
It's too early to tell who will do what when, imo... Spazito Aug 2015 #23
all to protect the anointed one, that's why. n/t retrowire Aug 2015 #12
Because Debbie Waterboy is looking for a sweet cabinet position. frylock Aug 2015 #19
... Cherry Creek Native Aug 2015 #24
Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #28
I wish I could post my LMMFAO to cascadiance's post below. L0oniX Aug 2015 #49
Some people thought there were too many then. ellisonz Aug 2015 #25
Hillary lost, she wants to win. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #26
Gotta protect the moneyed interests. Broward Aug 2015 #30
why have a debate...just so people can *question* what is entitled to Hillary? HFRN Aug 2015 #31
Oddly, it is only Bernie supporters who claim that MaggieD Aug 2015 #37
'I have never heard an HRC say anything even remotely like that' HFRN Aug 2015 #38
Link? MaggieD Aug 2015 #39
? HFRN Aug 2015 #42
So you claimed somebody said she is entitled, but you can't reference where? MaggieD Aug 2015 #44
! HFRN Aug 2015 #45
people didn't start watching till very end of 2007 BlueStateLib Aug 2015 #32
That might be an argument for only sanctioning 6 debates. It's not an argument winter is coming Aug 2015 #33
This is your second thread today on this topic MaggieD Aug 2015 #36
So you said. 6 is not enough. See how this works? Ed Suspicious Aug 2015 #40
Six is probably at least 2 more than anyone will watch. okasha Aug 2015 #46
Someone should put you in charge of stopping any possible second threads on a simular topic... L0oniX Aug 2015 #50
If Bernie is nominated, the DNC will support the republican nominee, Zorra Aug 2015 #41
There is a lot of daylight..., MaggieD Aug 2015 #43
LMFAO ...that may not be far from the truth. How much power & control would they have if Bernie wins L0oniX Aug 2015 #51
... SidDithers Aug 2015 #55
There were 9 already by this time in 2007. cyberswede Aug 2015 #48
i sort of stopped watching after #23 6chars Aug 2015 #52
Hillary doesn't do well in debates. That's the reason for 6 debates. Autumn Aug 2015 #56

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
1. It's not for our benefit, that's for damned sure. They're protecting Hillary.
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 12:13 PM
Aug 2015

A candidate who needs to be "protected" is a weak candidate.

Uncle Joe

(65,303 posts)
2. That's a good question, I believe it's because
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 12:16 PM
Aug 2015

the powers that be in the Democratic Party believed in the power of their ideas in 2008.

Thanks for the thread, L0oniX.

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
3. And people forget that our debates don't only reach Democratic primary voters...
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 12:21 PM
Aug 2015

All those "undecided" folks watch the debates from both the Rs and the Ds, to help them decide. The more we can get the D message out, the better.

Renew Deal

(85,273 posts)
5. There were basically no announced candidates on April 1.
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 12:25 PM
Aug 2015

And I mean none that were fully running. Some had exploratory committees. So that pushed everything back a little. But there is no reason we couldn't have August debates.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
13. Is it ... a female chicken?
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 03:23 PM
Aug 2015

I guess you can't really have a male chicken -- wouldn't that be a rooster?


BWAWK!

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
7. Embarrassing
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 01:34 PM
Aug 2015

I have hardly ever been so embarrassed of the DNC as I am now.

Their action to limit democracy is shameful and anyone who supports that decision should be likewise ashamed.

Spazito

(55,717 posts)
11. On May 16, 2007, the DNC announced the SIX sanctioned debates...
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 01:51 PM
Aug 2015

PRESS RELEASES from the Democratic National Committee
For Immediate Release
May 16, 2007

Contact: Karen Finney, Stacie Paxton

DNC ANNOUNCES DATES, MEDIA SPONSORS AND LOCATIONS FOR SANCTIONED DEBATES

Washington, DC - The Democratic National Committee in partnership with six state parties today announced the dates, media sponsors and cities for the six DNC sanctioned debates. Additional details regarding specifics for the individual debates including additional media partners and logistics will be announced at a later time. The DNC sanctioned debate schedule will be:

DNC SANCTIONED DEBATES:

July 23, 2007: YouTube/Google and CNN* in Charleston, SC

August 19, 2007: ABC in Des Moines, IA

September 26, 2007: NBC News/MSNBC** in Hanover, NH

October 30, 2007: NBC News/MSNBC** in Philadelphia, PA

November 15, 2007: CNN* in Las Vegas, NV

December 10, 2007: CBS in Los Angeles, CA

"Our strong field of Democratic candidates have been working hard, talking about the issues the American people care about and laying out a positive vision for America’s future," said DNC Chairman Howard Dean. "We are grateful to the media sponsors and our state parties for their role in providing important, diverse settings for the American people to hear directly from our candidates."

*Debate will be simulcast on CNN en Espanol.
**Telemundo will re-broadcast both debates.



http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2008/primdeb08/dnc040507pr.html


I believe that is the same number announced for this primary as well.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
15. There was no exclusivity clause last time.
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 04:12 PM
Aug 2015

Candidates could debate as much as they chose. The DNC wasnt trying to force the candidates not to debate. Thanks for bringing that up.

Spazito

(55,717 posts)
16. Interesting, debates have been limited but forums have not...
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 04:28 PM
Aug 2015

a gaping loophole I am sure will be used. I do find the exclusivity clause, such as it is, to be ridiculous and serving no one including the candidates.

"There is a loophole, of sorts. While the extra debates are forbidden, the DNC’s rules welcome additional candidate forums, where contenders speak back-to-back from the same stage, but do not engage directly with each other.

“I’m sure there will be plenty of other forums for the candidates to make their case to voters, and that they will make the most out of every opportunity,” the DNC’s Schulman said. The party will happily facilitate those type of events, but is prepared to crack down on unofficial events."

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/liberal-group-latest-call-more-democratic-debates

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
18. So the purpose then, is to strictly limit the candidates interaction with one another?
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 04:43 PM
Aug 2015

That makes the whole thing even more absurd. I really dont understand what theyre trying to accomplish.

Spazito

(55,717 posts)
20. Forums do have their place as well...
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 04:58 PM
Aug 2015

There are less 'fireworks' to be sure as they are more issue oriented rather than personality oriented. I like both formats for different reasons and a good mix of both is of benefit, imo.

The candidates will be interacting with each other on six 'sanctioned' debates so there is that, whether that will be enough, it's too early to tell, imo.

I think the DNC is making a mistake re having an exclusivity clause even though they have also written in the big loophole along with it.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
21. I agree with you re: the exclusivity clause.
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 05:09 PM
Aug 2015

Why in the world should they care if the candidates want to debate more than 6 times? And sadly, only 4 will come before IA and NH. Its pretty pathetic really.

I would *love* it if all the candidates said "to hell with the sanctioned debates". And attended as many debates, sponsored by whomever, whenever they wanted. I'd be willing to bet Sanders and O'Malley would do it. The others... I'd guess not so much.

Spazito

(55,717 posts)
23. It's too early to tell who will do what when, imo...
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 05:14 PM
Aug 2015

It is, after all, the silly season and will remain so for a while yet.

 
24. ...
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 05:22 PM
Aug 2015

.....which she will never get. She will be either primaried or put in a much lesser role after Bernie's victory.

Response to frylock (Reply #19)

 

HFRN

(1,469 posts)
31. why have a debate...just so people can *question* what is entitled to Hillary?
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 05:49 PM
Aug 2015


the nerve of some people....just don't know their place
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
37. Oddly, it is only Bernie supporters who claim that
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 06:12 PM
Aug 2015

I have never heard an HRC say anything even remotely like that. Why the strawman?

 

HFRN

(1,469 posts)
38. 'I have never heard an HRC say anything even remotely like that'
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 06:14 PM
Aug 2015

no, she leaves that to her supporters

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
39. Link?
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 06:15 PM
Aug 2015

Because like I said, I have never seen any HRC supporter say anything remotely like that. Why the strawman?

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
44. So you claimed somebody said she is entitled, but you can't reference where?
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 06:46 PM
Aug 2015

The strawman is yours, I am afraid.

BlueStateLib

(937 posts)
32. people didn't start watching till very end of 2007
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 05:58 PM
Aug 2015

and 2007 there were 11 democratic primary candidates, 2015 is a three person race.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
33. That might be an argument for only sanctioning 6 debates. It's not an argument
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 06:08 PM
Aug 2015

for the exclusivity rule.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
36. This is your second thread today on this topic
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 06:11 PM
Aug 2015

.... so I will just repeat. 6 is plenty.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
46. Six is probably at least 2 more than anyone will watch.
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 07:04 PM
Aug 2015

If Hillary performs in the first couple like she did at the Iowa dinner, it won't be her supporters who'll be calling for a halt.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
50. Someone should put you in charge of stopping any possible second threads on a simular topic...
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 08:48 PM
Aug 2015

but they haven't.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
41. If Bernie is nominated, the DNC will support the republican nominee,
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 06:16 PM
Aug 2015

They would rather see Donald Trump in the WH than Bernie Sanders.

Because Trump will assist them in maintaining oligarchy, and maintaining oligarchy is clearly the primary function of the DNC.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
43. There is a lot of daylight...,
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 06:39 PM
Aug 2015

Between Oligarchy and Socialism. Most of us would prefer neither. That's why Clinton is the best choice.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
51. LMFAO ...that may not be far from the truth. How much power & control would they have if Bernie wins
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 08:50 PM
Aug 2015

Autumn

(48,978 posts)
56. Hillary doesn't do well in debates. That's the reason for 6 debates.
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 12:07 PM
Aug 2015

Off the cuff speaking is difficult for her sometimes and that's where she screws up.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»26 Democratic primary deb...