2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumStill no Veep.
Does being an unethical, hypocritical, imperialistic, out of touch, fundamentalist bastard also make one a coward?
Or is it just that no one wants to run with his dumb ass?
teddy51
(3,491 posts)his VEEP. Maybe he will run with his wife as VEEP.
cbrer
(1,831 posts)The "duller than him" bill. God, the thought just made my penis pull in!
Ptah
(34,122 posts)cbrer
(1,831 posts)But isn't there usually a name by now? With the "official" pronouncement at the convention?
RedStateLiberal
(1,374 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Since the GOP Convention is going first, Romney should be announcing his VP soon.
In '08, Obama announced Biden on August 23rd:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/eye-on-2008/obama-picks-biden.html
In '04, Kerry announced Edwards on July 6th:
http://articles.cnn.com/2004-07-06/politics/kerry.vp_1_kerry-ticket-senator-kerry-key-battleground-state?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS
In '00, Bush announced Cheney on July 25th:
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/07/25/us/2000-campaign-running-mate-bush-reported-set-name-cheney-partner-ticket.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
In '96, Dole announced Clinton on August 10th:
http://cgi.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/news/9608/10/dole.announce/
In '92, Clinton picked Gore on July 10th:
http://articles.latimes.com/1992-07-10/news/mn-1845_1_running-mate
I didn't do incumbent parties because they either had their running mate (as was the case for Bush in '92, Clinton in '96 and Bush in '04) or because their convention was held after the Republicans and their pick came after the Republican's choice - which was the case in '00 and '08.
So, of the past five elections, three were picked in July and two in August. The latest Romney will announce is the week prior to the Republican Convention, so any time before August 27th.
SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)But, then again if you were a Republican being vetted. Would you want to tie your political future to Romney?
former9thward
(33,424 posts)cbrer
(1,831 posts)Than to ask a loaded question like that. I appreciate the heads up, but all I really wanted to do was bust his chops.
onenote
(46,142 posts)I get that your post was well intentioned, but in the future I suggest that you take a moment to check the historical record.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)They want excitement going into the convention.
It will be a while yet.
Marie Marie
(11,309 posts)Romney certainly isn't generating any on his own. They should bottle him as a sleep aid.
PopYoColla
(59 posts)I think imma take "no one wants to run with his dumb ass" for $200 Alex....
bluedigger
(17,437 posts)Patience.
flamingdem
(40,891 posts)T-Paw or Portman is my guess
FSogol
(47,623 posts)michaelslomo
(322 posts)Also, as far as your description of Rmoney as "an unethical, hypocritical, imperialistic, out of touch, fundamentalist bastard," he may be many things, but as a Mormon he is definitely not a fundamentalist. I think the fundies do not even consider Mormonism to be Christian.
nevergiveup
(4,815 posts)for Rubio to get a couple more months of senatorial experience and then he will be ready
progress2k12nbynd
(221 posts)I love that woman.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)See the nominating process for the VP here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Vice_President#Nominating_process
Interesting tidbit:
Under the Twenty-second Amendment, the President of the United States may not be elected to more than two terms. However, there is no similar such limitation as to how many times one can be elected Vice President. Scholars disagree whether a former President barred from election to the Presidency is also ineligible to be elected Vice President, as suggested by the Twelfth Amendment.[18][19] The issue has never been tested in practice.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Vice_President#Nominating_process
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)cbrer
(1,831 posts)(insert Alfred E Newman smart ass grin)