2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Keeps on Rising, Hillary...not so much....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.htmlAnd over a year still until election time.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)V0ltairesGh0st
(306 posts)I was suggesting he'll be the nominee by next November easily with steady numbers like these.
musiclawyer
(2,335 posts)It could happen a destroy as this year
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)competitors they are gonna end up more inline with a primary.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)But one thing that did catch my eye is the two CNN/ORG polls. She went from +37 to +18 in about three weeks.
That is roughly a 50% reduction in her lead in a short period of time.
Again, to early to know anything but it does look like her name recognition support is beginning to evaporate.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)At this time in 2007, Obama was a good 25-points behind.
What Bernie has done is remarkable.
daybranch
(1,309 posts)Obama was a centrist with little experience and no actual unified economic philosophy, and a believer in his ability to make deals. Much like Bill Clinton. Like Clinton once in Office deals that supported rich donors and often outweighed the economic good of our people.
Bernie is the very very smart progressive we had hoped Obama was. He will never make us guess over his decisions on things like the Keystone Pipeline. Bernie is a straight arrow, putting progressive values and people first.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Exactly...
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)We're talking August. Let's see what the spread between Bernie and Hillary is in October, because it is just as possible that Bernie plateaus or Clinton consolidated more support by then; especially when Biden declines to enter the race.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Not sure why you're so anxious to engage in historical revisionism, but the data isn't negotiable.
She started with a 45+ point lead in 2007 before she even took off her coat, spent $100 million by the end of 2007, and had control of the Democratic Party machinery. She had every conceivable advantage. She didn't just lose, she pissed it away vis a vis poor campaign management and stooping to unsavory tactics.
And she's headed for another defeat as a consequence of her reckless behavior at State. This again by her own hand.
HappyPlace
(568 posts)She could do a lot of good with th Foundations if we pick Bernie.
Win Win.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Cherry Creek Native
(55 posts)
(I'm sorry, but that's what it sounds like... when Clinton's campaign is on a collision course, representing a repeat of 2008)
frylock
(34,825 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)Is basically in the same spot as when she started, 58 then, 54 now. Bernie started at zero and had nowhere to go but up.