2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe use of the phrase "Hillary-hate" is a blatantly transparant and cynical ploy.
If you can't answer the case, label it. It's as simple as breathing.
The phrase has a kind of grim, disinterested, middlebrow cleverness, it carries the implication that the "hate" is unreasonable or lacking substance without responding to the content of the text that has been labelled as "hate". Thats the phrase's purpose, not to repel any genuine condition of tendentiousness, but to place certain candidates beyond criticism.
It's just exactly the same lazy gibberish we've all had to come to expect from certain people.
But, sigh, there you go. People without a case of their own are almost reduced to inventing labels with which to construct the nebulous appearance of unwholesomeness in their opponent's case.
"Gay agenda", anyone?
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)feel the "bern", which is kind of threatening, though I'm sure no one had ever felt it but me.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)Feel it? How you all are just berning - stupid idiots who haven't accepted his message. Feel it? Ooh. You've been berned.
.
Bullying and intimidation is just that.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)If you don't feel it, I just feel bad for you. No threat intended.
The Bern is not a physical threat, by the way, but I guess it could be considered a threat to WIN the primaries fairly (even if others by don't play fairly).
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)bern with no good reason. See a doctor, perhaps?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Try a search on personality disorders. It might help you to understand why some seem incapable of feeling the 'Bern".
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)when the mirror is less than 50 feet away, it would be quick research.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I was trying to add a little levity to the conversation. Like having a berning rash that needed tending or something.
Or are you just joking like I was. It's so hard to tell anymore.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Really hope you get the help and info you need.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I hope that's not the case - inferring I have a mental disorder .
sibelian
(7,804 posts)And you think BERNIE supporters are INTIMIDATING?
My dear Control-Z, I think you misunderstand.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)are you threatened by rowing teams shouting 'STROKE, STROKE, STROKE,' or think that someone is trying to express even-bias when they shout 'FOUR!' at a driving range or puttputt...
When someone 'drives the ball' does that mean they're giving the ball a lift to the stadium, or crushing it under heel to force it to work harder? you never can tell.....
what about someone that's 'A knock out'...yes, yes, it's terribly misogynist to state that someone could look good enough to make one lose consciousness, but obviously THIS one is a bullying threat against the person in question...
Maybe it's bias against forests for people to field questions and terrible to poll someone, afterall, what did they do to be driven up there in the first place?
I can't imagine how you reacted when you saw Mrs.C on happy days tell someone to 'SIT ON IT' my GODS, my pearls, oh no...
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Sure, it is. We couldn't possibly mean feel the energy of his rallies, or express excitement about finally having someone to vote *for* now could we?
We just needed a cudgel to brow beat camp weathervane with, amirite???
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)just hate Hillary. amirite???
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Way to make the OP's point!
You are awesome.
In fact I respect Hillary. I also dislike her for a number of reasons, but I do respect her. She's my 3rd choice as a candidate, above Chafee, Webb and Lee Mercer.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I really need to hear more from him and the rest.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)I don't know that much about him maybe he should be third and Hillary fourth.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I guess we will have to do our own research on him since debates will be so limited and won't be coming soon. And if we don't know much about him, imagine how ignorant the 'normal' (read, non-political) people are.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)IIRC he was the first to officially announce.
frylock
(34,825 posts)and this time, it's personal.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Actually he has some fresh word salad for the new effort. The new phrase is "With power of attorney"
Here's a TV ad on buzzfeed. Sorry for the clickbait link.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)they were, I am guilty of Hillary-hate?
I can assure everyone that I don't hate Hillary in the least. But I sure don't support some of her foolish and dangerous votes.
So a K&R for your post.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)There was no real need to do so, however. Her supporters have been seeing it for about 10 years now.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Or do you think I just HATE everyone that I wouldn't want as President, in which case, I must HATE an awful lot of people including some that I actually love?
What a silly premise.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)On the other hand, your opinion is just as valid as mine, so believe as you like.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Much as I love history, I am too focused on the future (and its importance) right now to dwell upon past election rhetoric for the time being.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Is that enough hate for you? You do understand that "archives" can go back just a month, yes?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)As it would for any candidate accused of DU forbidden terms and rightly so.
I think a few Hillary supporters have a few hidden posts as well, no?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)You know there is rhetoric on both sides, you are right about that, but the rhetoric directed at women in general always seems a bit more harsh.
God forbid a woman not know her place... She might be considered "testy", or "cold and calculating" even when it was pointed it out that the OP those responses were to was a TOTAL fabrication.
IMO, people should do more to support their candidate rather than try to tear down someone else's.
We'd be better off if we did that more consistently.
frylock
(34,825 posts)while digging through those archives.
treestar
(82,383 posts)quite disingenuous. OK you don't hate her. But don't pretend there are no people who do.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)It trips off the tongue, it says nothing, means nothing and makes anyone using the phrase look and sound slightly petty.
That's about it.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)At least those who voted in this poll:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251541048
anamnua
(1,111 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)you must hate her, right? Sorry to disappoint you but I don't waste much time on hating anyone, least of all Hillary since I actually admire much of what she has done.
She has let me down though and I reserve my right to vote for someone that hasn't, at least for the primaries.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Primaries tend to focus antagonistic feelings aboutt candidates and among supporters.
However, that phrase gets tossed around too automatically around here. There's a lot of "Hillary dislike" and "Hillary like but disapprove of her as presidential candidate" etc.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Pompous much?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)people who outright admit they hate her. I've seen her called vile,disgusting,a liar,self anointed,the queen,her royal highness,undeserving,unprofessional,a republican,a puppet,a dirty trickster,along with accusations that she slept her way to the top through marriage and that she's too dumb to think for herself and needs advisers to do it for her. Please don't pretend that this place isn't swimming in hatred when it comes to Hillary Clinton,because it most certainly is.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I don't hate her but I do feel let down by her votes. I don't even hate her supporters that constantly denigrate my candidate who has always supported progressive candidates.
I have a strong suspicion that you may just be projecting your feelings on others right now.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)swipes at her that aren't people "disagreeing with her policies",one would have to be willfully blind to say otherwise.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)The OP isn't worth it.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)because I have certainly seen it here in regards to the candidate I support. In fact, it is costing me quite a few dollars.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)But I am sure you are perfectly aware of the utterly unfair accusations hurled at my candidate and to deny that any have been is disingenuous.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)with a raging venom that is more than political opposition. Especially right wingers. They come unhinged at the mention of Hillary.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)I can chalk up some of Hillary-bashing up to ignorance, some of it to wanting to be part of the "in crowd" at DU, but there's definitely irrational hatred in there too. Particularly among people who proudly claim they won't vote for her in the GE.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Can you explain her vote to send our kids to die for a war based on lies? Can you explain the thousands of deaths of innocent people in a sovereign nation that lost their lives based on that vote?
Can you seriously not understand why some of us find it hard to accept that Hillary voted for the Bush agenda?
Good gawd, I have tried very hard to not bring up her astonishingly naive, at best, vote but some of you keep forcing it up.
I do not hate her but I will certainly wholeheartedly give my support to someone less naive or smarter, whatever the case may be when given the option. Thank God, Bernie gave me that option.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)I can't explain the Iraq War vote, any more than I can explain why Bernie voted against the Brady Bill or for gun industry immunity. BTW, in terms of American innocent lives lost, guns are a much bigger problem than wars, by more than an order of magnitude. (Yes, I get that the Iraq Ware cost much more than just US lives, it's Iraqi lives, and money, and international law, and the chaos that's still going on.)
My guess is that the Iraq War vote was political. Every Dem with presidential ambitions voted for it. War was gonna happen, and at the time the political winds were blowing in Bush's direction. Miscalculation, of course (in addition to bad policy). Come to think of it, Bernie's pro-gun votes were probably also based on political calculation, coming from Vermont.
What's "naive" is to think that Bernie is going to be able to defeat the GOP. That they're not going to be running non-stop ads saying that he just wants to raise taxes and dismantle the free-enterprise system and all the rest. That somehow an electorate, more than half of whom won't consider voting for a socialist, are going suddenly open their minds to the distinctions between "democratic socialism" and "regular socialism".
That you can go take on the billion dollar Koch Brothers with a tiny war chest and somehow come out ahead.
And the other thing naive is thinking that even 10% of what Bernie proposes is going to get through congress. In fact, the outcome of a Bernie or Hillary presidency isn't going to be that different. Fighting with congress, getting a few things passed. So all this stuff about not voting for Hillary if she is the nominee (I don't mean you, but don't pretend you haven't seen it) or how Hillary is no better than a Republican (ditto) is purely idiotic and, yes, hate-driven.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Silly nonsense about "hate" comes only from people who want so sow further division.
HFRN
(1,469 posts)'I am delighted to be the Senator from Punjab as well as from New York'
(She really said it. It was a nice 'shout out' to New York, to mention them, even if it was 2nd place behind Punjab)
Washington May 18th - I am delighted to be the Senator from Punjab as well as from New York said Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and the former first lady of the United States of America.
source:
http://www.sikhcouncilusa.org/article.aspx?article=evtdinner
Clinton's free-trade advocacy is hitting labor where it lives
Competition helps both sides, she says. A Buffalo deal yielded a few jobs.
July 30, 2007|Peter Wallsten | Times Staff Writer
BUFFALO, N.Y. To many labor unions and high-tech workers, the Indian giant Tata Consultancy Services is a serious threat -- a company that has helped move U.S. jobs to India while sending thousands of foreign workers on temporary visas to the United States.
So when Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) came to this struggling city to announce some good news, her choice of partners was something of a surprise.
Joining Tata Consultancy's chief executive at a downtown hotel, Clinton announced that the company would open a software development office in Buffalo and form a research partnership with a local university. Tata told a newspaper that it might hire as many as 200 people.
The 2003 announcement had clear benefits for the senator and the company: Tata received good press, and Clinton burnished her credentials as a champion for New York's depressed upstate region.
But less noticed was how the event signaled that Clinton, who portrays herself as a fighter for American workers, had aligned herself with Indian American business leaders and Indian companies feared by the labor movement.
http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jul/30/nation/na-buffalo30
gosh - why would there be any hostility to her? she going to introduce herself as 'the President of Punjab as well as the USA too?
you consider 'US Senator' a minor title?
DanTex
(20,709 posts)HFRN
(1,469 posts)trying to smear concerns as 'Xenophobia'. And that's pretty much what we'com come to expect from your camp - pushing labels on anyone who points out troubling aspects of her track record
a Senator should NEVER, EVER introduce themselves as ANYTHING but as 'the Senator from (US state that elected them)'
THAT's the issue
so, while we're at it, here's another one
"Outsourcing will continue. There is no way to legislate against reality. We are not in favor of putting up fences."
Hillary had said on Feb 28 in India, according to a report by the Asia Times. Kirwin also cited her position as co-chair of the Friends of India Caucus in the Senate, a group of senators that supports issues important to India, including outsourcing and H-1B and L-1 visas, as another reason behind the ITPAA's decision to give the award to the prospective Democrat presidential nominee.
(Press Trust Of India, 3/5/05)
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Kennedy the disloyal traitor!
Yes, your post is a perfect example of Hillary-hate.
HFRN
(1,469 posts)to say 'Ich bin ien Berliner' (translated by some as 'I am a jelly donut'), is like saying 'I am Irish' or 'I am Catholic', a personal attribute, which is far different from what she did, directly ascribing the office to the place, and putting the state that elected her SECOND
DanTex
(20,709 posts)It was the same thing what Kennedy did: showing solidarity with people from a different country. It's a good thing. Diplomacy.
Again, your post is a perfect example of Hillary-hate.
HFRN
(1,469 posts)total breach of etiquette - the title belongs to NEW YORK
New York ONLY
DanTex
(20,709 posts)I live in NY. Doesn't bother me one bit.
HFRN
(1,469 posts)you can choose to not be offended by it yourself, but that doesn't make it any less a breach
DanTex
(20,709 posts)This might be worse than "Obama bowed to foreign leaders" right-wing meme. But, again, thanks for bringing this up as a shining example of the silly Hillary-hate that pervades.
"Breach of etiquette".
HFRN
(1,469 posts)(maybe YOU just don't like African Americans - LOL 2 can play your game)
Obama apologizes over 'Hillary Clinton (D-Punjab)' memo
Published: Tuesday, June 19, 2007
NEWTON, Iowa The Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama said his campaign made a "dumb mistake" when it circulated a memo criticizing Hillary Rodham Clinton's financial ties to India.
Obama on Monday disavowed the memo, which was headlined, "Hillary Clinton (D-Punjab)," a play on the standard reference to a candidate's party and constituency. The memo referred to investments in India by former President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton; her fund-raising among Indian-Americans; and the former president's $300,000 in speech fees from Cisco, a company that has moved U.S. jobs to India.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/19/world/americas/19iht-obama.1.6203898.html?_r=0
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Someone on his campaign staff sent out the memo and he apologized for it and said it was a dumb mistake. Apparently you didn't even read the article.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Your entire post is so sad - labeling any criticism of Hillary as "bashing", and flinging the false and reeking "xenophobia" accusation. I repeat - no one would have been happy to lose jobs to ANY country.
Fail and fail.
HFRN
(1,469 posts)facts aren't going to get them very far
labels are all they've got
DanTex
(20,709 posts)India, but nobody seems to complain much about that. Why do you think that is?
The xenophobia and Hillary-bashing is bringing up Hillary's "senator from Punjab" statement as being a "breach of etiquette." This is on the level of "Obama bows to foreign" leaders in its stupidity.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Germany was a random pick. And, trade deficit or no trade deficit, NO ONE likes losing their job to anyone from any country. Trade deficit has nothing to do with that.
I hope you are not in IT, because your logic skills seem lacking. Especially if you really hope to sell the bullshit that we would be fine with losing IT jobs to Germany and hearing Hillary announce she is the senator from Berlin.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)They were all great people and highly qualified. It didn't threaten me one bit, because I was also highly qualified.
I'm sure there were some xenophobes somewhere that didn't like working with people from other countries, and would freak out at a harmless statement like "senator from Punjab", but I wasn't one of them.