2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWOW !!! - Hillary Clinton: "No Evidence" Joe Biden Could Steal Her 2016 Support - CBSNews
Hillary Clinton: "No evidence" Joe Biden could steal her 2016 supportBy Stephanie Condon - CBS News
August 26, 2015, 6:13 PM
<snip>
Hillary Clinton, the frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination, said Wednesday she has "seen no evidence" that Vice President Joe Biden would freeze some of her Democratic support if he were to jump into the race.
The former secretary of state also told reporters in Iowa that Biden has yet to fill her in on how seriously he's considering his own White House bid.
"And I have not asked for that," she added. "I just want the vice president to decide to do what is right for him and his family," she said.
Clinton stressed the hardships Biden has endured, including the death in May of eldest son, Beau.
"It has to be really really hard for him," she said. "I was at his son's funeral, I can't really imagine the grief and the heartbreak."
Clinton said she as "a great deal of admiration and respect" for Biden. "He has to make a very difficult decision for himself and his family, and he should have the space and opportunity to decide what he wants to to."
Biden is expected to make that decision by the end of September...
<snip>
More: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-no-evidence-joe-biden-could-steal-2016-support/
HappyPlace
(568 posts)[font size=12]BERNIE![/font size]
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)candidates statements based on "words clipped from whole sentences".
"There is no such thing as bad publicity"....how much more obviously true is that old maxim lately?
WillyT
(72,631 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)is that is what she is saying. the quote was so chopped up to get a
from people.
her full statement was perfectly fine, nice, professional. i gotta assume the other part was too, but media had to make something out of it.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)flag for me...always. Not respecting context gets no respect from me from anyone or source...it is inherently dishonest.
They are not called "scare marks" for nothing.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)what is this bullshit. i get posts of yours and i have to peruse the story to see if the "quote" is accurate. where in that article did you find
did you make it up?
surely not
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)nope. looked again.
you made up a fuggin bogus quote?
SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)The not-Hillary crowd already chose sides. If anything, Biden getting in the race would peel support from the not-Hillary candidates.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)or they do not.
Sanders isn't much impacted by Biden, but he might be cut back by Warren coming in.
I think it's pretty clear that Clinton has rock solid support somewhere around 40% give or take, unless she gets indicted.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)You bad...
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I can't turn off my YOU-ARE-CHEATING!!! radar.
But sometimes there REALLY IS a person out there cheating.
boston bean
(36,931 posts)start at 3:28 listen, then forward to 7:28 to hear the remarks as they were actually spoken, not sliced and diced for some ridiculous news article, spamming for clicks.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Classy, and professional, as usual.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)I second your thanks...for Truth.
Folks need to get it that this kind of distortion of free speech stuff does Sanders, or the Party, no favors.
Historic NY
(40,037 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Right down the toilet. It does get old though.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)to see if i missed something, or just blatantly dishonest.
boston bean
(36,931 posts)Helps to actually see and hear for oneself, no?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)BainsBane
(57,757 posts)Someone manages to clip out certain parts, sometimes out of context, other times simply trying to may hay out of nothing. Or they post an article and leave out central paragraphs with key facts essential to an understanding of the story, as though the whole truth doesn't suit their purposes.
boston bean
(36,931 posts)Weird. Strange. Malicious?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)What she might really say: "I hate the way the press is treating Bernie Sanders during this campaign."
How the press might portray it: "I hate...Bernie Sanders."
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)On purpose they left highly relevant paragraphs out to push an agenda that coincidentally coincided with the GOP...funny how that happens!
William769
(59,147 posts)what more need be said.
BainsBane
(57,757 posts)Or why some think choosing particular snippets helps them make a case against Clinton.
One point she continually makes is worth nothing. She says, I hope to "earn the votes of as many people as I can." Voters' support indeed has to be earned. It is not due anyone, as some seem to assume for their own candidate.
sheshe2
(97,630 posts)Truth!
riversedge
(80,810 posts)beyond frustrated with this nonsense--and deceit.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)interview you chopped the hell out of to make it something it wasnt.
she was very caring.
that is horrible
WillyT
(72,631 posts)But I'm glad you're feeling better.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)where did that one come from on the other OP you link us to?
WillyT
(72,631 posts)But I also mention them up top, and provide a link below...
So what's your point ???
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Clinton is the victim of distortion now, who will it be later?
Even if it is someone else I will be here with the same observations....media distortions are not a "WOW!!!"...ever
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)She said no such thing.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)from people who support Bernie Sanders. I'm not sure why you people feel you need to resort to that though.
olddots
(10,237 posts)zip it ....zip it zip it !
riversedge
(80,810 posts)in the article.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)There's nothing unflattering in the OP quotes.
What I find interesting is that Joan Walsh, a serious Hillary supporter, wrote a hit piece on Joe Biden this morning. She does not want him to run. No sirree.
Gee, I wonder why?
http://www.salon.com/2015/08/26/the_case_against_joe_biden_2016_why_remind_democrats_hes_even_less_liberal_than_hillary/
jfern
(5,204 posts)Even though she's spent over $1 million on them.
Renew Deal
(85,151 posts)Te polling shows that she takes a little from both her and Sanders, and isn't that close to either.