2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFor Hillary Clinton, Email No Longer A Joking Matter - CNN
For Hillary Clinton, email no longer a joking matterDan Merica and Eric Bradner, CNN
Updated 9:28 PM ET, Wed August 26, 2015
<snip>
Ankeny, Iowa (CNN) - Hillary Clinton on Wednesday reversed course in her handling of questions about her private email server when she was secretary of state. In recent weeks, she has either dismissed the controversy or joked about it. But on Wednesday she said she had made a mistake.
"My use of personal email was allowed by the State Department. It clearly wasn't the best choice. I should have used two emails -- one personal, one for work -- and I take responsibility for that decision," she said when asked at an Iowa event.
The answer shows much more contrition than she has of late, even acknowledging that she understands why people care about the issue.
"Well, I know people have raised questions about my email use as secretary of state, and I understand why. I get it," she said during a press conference at a local community college.
This is a departure for Clinton, who in past answers has been combative -- and at times joked -- about whether the issue matters at all.
In Nevada earlier this month, for example, Clinton said her email use was normal.
"Everybody is acting like this first time this has ever happened. It happens all the time," she said.
When a reporter pressed her about the issue growing until Election Day, Clinton shot back, "Nobody talks to me about it, other than you guys."
<snip>
More: http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/26/politics/hillary-clinton-iowa-rural-policy-2016/
awake
(3,226 posts)I only wish she acted this way when this news broke 6 months ago, but better late than never.
frylock
(34,825 posts)oasis
(53,789 posts)6chars
(3,967 posts)the way i see it, if there is something devastating, she would probably drop out. most likely, there won't be and this won't turn into anything other than innuendo. in the first case, i won't need to decide whether to support her, and in the second case, the emails aren't a factor. bottom line, i am not going to waste any brain space on this.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)done that...not me!? Or anyone I know!
Not that it all makes any difference to anyone but those with axes to grind and witches to burn.
As an aside, using a dedicated server is far more secure than a personal computer or a government server environment....as Clinton has repeatedly stated and no one wants to report because few want context, everyone wants Twitter-bites.
"A desktop computer system typically runs a user-friendly operating system and desktop applications to facilitate desktop-oriented tasks. In contrast, a server manages all network resources. Servers are often dedicated (meaning it performs no other task besides server tasks). Because a server is engineered to manage, store, send and process data 24-hours a day it has to be more reliable than a desktop computer and offers a variety of features and hardware not typically used in the average desktop computer."
Anyway, the whole thing is such a joke that even the mass media is walking the whole thing back because it is of so little consequence to anyone except Republicans....and maybe some others.
Cue the Twitter-bite objections.....
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Gets 'em every time. A little concession and the shit hits the fan.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)I even noticed Joe Scarborough has forgotten to say email, email, email, email.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Curious.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)The voters will have the final say.
Andy823
(11,555 posts)So why keep posting this crap day after day?
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)<snip>
Clinton's use of her private email while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013 came to light in March and drew fire from political opponents who accused her of sidestepping transparency and record-keeping laws.
The FBI was looking into the security of the federal records and classified information contained among Clinton's emails. The U.S. government considers federal records to be government property.
The Justice Department has said the FBI investigation began after a government watchdog said at least four emails out of a sample of 40 he inspected contained classified information, including two that contained information deemed "top secret," the highest classification level.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 26, 2015, 10:55 PM - Edit history (1)
Metric System
(6,048 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)But I bet you didn't know that, right?
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Try again.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)http://cnsnews.com/news/article/brittany-m-hughes/ig-clintons-emails-included-classified-information-30000-emails
(CNSNews.com) Four out of a sample of just 40 emails that were on former Secretary of State Hillary Clintons personal email server included IC-derived classified information, according to a memorandum that L. Charles McCullough, III, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, sent yesterday to the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate intelligence committees and to DNI James Clapper.
Additionally, McCullough said, we were informed by State FOIA officials that there are potentially hundreds of classified emails within the approximately 30,000 provided by former Secretary Clinton and that these 30,00 emails are purported to have been copied to a thumb drive in the possession of former Secretary Clintons personal counsel, Williams and Connelly attorney David Kendall.
Since the referenced 25 June 2015 notification, we were informed by State FOIA officials that there are potentially hundreds of classified emails within the approximately 30,000 provided by former Secretary Clinton, the IG informed the intelligence chairmen and the DNI.
We note that none of the emails we reviewed had classification or dissemination markings, but some included IC-derived classified information and should have been handled as classified, appropriately marked, and transmitted via a secure network, the IG said.
Further, he said, my offices limited sampling of 40 of the emails revealed four contained classified IC information which should have been marked and handled at SECRET level.
The IG said that he had referred the matter to counterintelligence officials at the State Department, in the Intelligence Community, and the FBI.
As I advised in my 25 June 2015 notification, the 30,000 emails in question are purported to have been copied to a thumb drive in the possession of former Secretary Clintons personal counsel, Williams and Connelly attorney David Kendall, said the IG. As my offices limited sampling identified four emails containing classified IC information, I referred this matter to counterintelligence officials at State and within the IC, including the National Counterintelligence and Security Center and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
<snip>
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)A State Department spokesman late Tuesday described the top-secret designation as a recommendation and said they had not been marked classified at the time, but said staffers circulated these e-mails on unclassified systems in 2009 and 2011 and ultimately some were forwarded to Secretary Clinton.
Nick Merrill, a Clinton spokesman, said Tuesday night that Clinton is cooperating with the FBI probe. He declined to say whether the FBI ordered that she turn over the devices and when her attorney, David Kendall, had done so.
She directed her team to give her e-mail server that was used during her tenure as secretary to the Department of Justice, as well as a thumb drive containing copies of her e-mails already provided to the State Department, Merrill said. She pledged to cooperate with the governments security inquiry, and if there are more questions, we will continue to address them.
The inquiry by the FBI is considered preliminary and appears to be focused on ensuring the proper handling of classified material. Officials have said that Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, is not a target.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/top-secret-e-mails-were-sent-on-clintons-private-account-official-says/2015/08/11/f3117f08-403d-11e5-9561-4b3dc93e3b9a_story.html
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/08/21/us-usa-election-clinton-emails-idUSKCN0QQ0BW20150821
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)You were desperately trying to imply the FBI was after Hillary, and you got busted. They aren't.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)He wants to be president.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Maybe he won't lose for a third time. Who knows?
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)
bornskeptic
(1,330 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Promoting this Bush man was a mistake, in the broadest meaning of the word, and in hindsight and out of historical context.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Charged with propping up their fake scandals. I'm disgusted that libs have been co-opted by tea party style nonsense like this.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)madville
(7,856 posts)18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material is one problem.
The State Department messed up when it gave her attorney a safe to store the thumb drive in an unauthorized facility, especially now that it has come out he didn't have the proper clearance. A big question is also who specifically gave him the thumb drive?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)BTW, there was two innocent people killed today in Virginia. Gun violence is a problem.
madville
(7,856 posts)I wouldn't think they would be admitting to any wrongdoing while the FBI is investigating the matter, of course it's going to be saying everything was done right.
I trust the FBI to honestly investigate the situation and make the right recommendations to DOJ either clearing everything up or selecting whoever to prosecute if need be.
Whatever happens I hope it comes down before the primaries start.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Nobody is going to be "prosecuted" - they are looking at States classification and document storage processes. For instance moving documents appropriately once they become retroactively classified.
SMH.
short circuit
(145 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Hillary did the emails, this has happened in the past. Of course, the GOP wants something to continue past the primaries and for myself this is a lot to do about nothing but to console the GOP, I don't need to console the GOP.
short circuit
(145 posts)Classic Clinton supporter techinque.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)short circuit
(145 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)short circuit
(145 posts)in the content of that thread. It's deflection, plain and simple. Bye.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)This email thing is pure bullshit on the same level as Benghazi..
Anyone who does or will not vote for Clinton based on these pieces of crap investigations, would never vote for Hillary
under any circumstances..even if she was anointed by Jesus..
Andy823
(11,555 posts)Is the fact that people who claim to be democrats keep pushing this shit for the GOP day in and day out. Why not try posting positive things about your candidate instead of posting all the dirt you can find on the "other" democratic candidates?
840high
(17,196 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)GOP has pushed a scandal I would think differently. $7 million has already been spent on Benghazi investigations and by the time it ends who knows how much the cost will be. Hillary was not the first SOS to use personal emails and this is known. If the email is a problem to you then I have to conclude this is your opinion, it is not my opinion and this is much ado about having another scandal. There are so many more important problems than the emails, we are allowing the GOP to bypass the needs of this nation by fueling the email scandal.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Big mistakes for someone trying to convince us she is qualified to be POTUS.
HappyPlace
(568 posts)...I don't have time for this shit, Zorra. Seriously.
We don't have time for an "evolver", do we?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Hillary's hand prints are all over them both.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)that was painful to watch.
Certainly not the steely, battle-tested candidate who could crunch attack memes for breakfast that her supporters have been promising us.
It's good that she's taking it seriously, instead of trying to shrug it off.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)The FBI got involved. They usually don't pursue a case unless there's some merit to it. I guess we'll see, but in the meantime let's try and focus on real issues. There's plenty of reasons to be wary of Clinton other than her emails.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)It's not just stupid, it's really, really unprofessional.