2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPoll: is Bernie Sanders racist?
47 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Not racist | |
46 (98%) |
|
Racist | |
1 (2%) |
|
Virulent racist | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
think
(11,641 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)I don't believe he's racist. However I do think he, as well as many Democrats, and people in general, are tone deaf.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)In a December Washington Post/ABC News poll, a survey that took place before the events in Baltimore but after grand juries had refused to indict police officers in Ferguson, Mo., and New York City who killed unarmed black men, 63 percent of white Americans said they were somewhat or very confident that blacks and whites are treated equally by police. Only 21 percent of African-American respondents agreed.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/06/24/can-clinton-step-forward-on-race-without-leaving-white-voters-behind/
Now could you return the favor and state your point and examples.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Amazing what people can't see.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)but if you are being serious here, I agree. The results are stunning.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)But I will point out that this is more of an example of ignorance than of tone deafness.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)it exists and is prevalent.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)It's a clear example of corporate media. Propaganda. Period.
Look, I was a crime reporter for 13 year, 12 years ago. I've been in PR/Marketing ever since, not because I was fired or let go, but because I divorced and needed a better paying job at more regular hours because my son was a toddler. So, I took my Communications degree and went into a very boring, but more lucrative field.
The thing is, having been on both sides of that coin, I'm VERY keen to propaganda. I actually HATE producing and have, thus far, succeeded in my job of now 8 years in not having to do it because they listen to me and WANT to be respectful to their audience. I'm paid well, have free health insurance and federal holidays. If all corporate jobs were like this, we'd be great as a company. Oh... I did starve for years first.
Our media sucks like shit. All of it. They won't question and, when they do, they're treated like Jorge Ramos.
This country is on a downward trajectory to "Idiocracy" faster that you know.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Very interesting post, because you have an inside view.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)In fact, his entire message for literally decades, could very easily be boiled down to a strong critique of unfair power structures of all kinds- not just economic.
And hypothetically, even if he was among that shameful 63% cited in the study, (which I very highly doubt)... he gets it now; as evidenced by his words and actions.
ornotna
(11,008 posts)But.
"And these same polls indicate that Americans who lean left and have more education are far more likely to see some level of ongoing discrimination against people of color in American life than their more conservative, or less educated white peers."
With that said, how does this paint Bernie Sanders as tone deaf?
KMOD
(7,906 posts)There's a real movement, and it's growing everyday. People have had enough.
Please don't think I'm singling him out though. Most have been slow in addressing it as well. I'm sad just reading some comments here at DU. A select few have decided to make it a political game as to which candidate has been dissed more by Black Lives Matter, as opposed to addressing and acknowledging their message.
The Black Lives Matter message is very important, and no one should be playing politics with it, or dismissing it. It's happening, and it's about damn time.
ornotna
(11,008 posts)And I appreciate your answer. BLM is very important.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)interested in issues and a lot of the great DUers who actually made this site a success, were still here.
DU has changed, eg, last year during the Ferguson Protests, something that in the past would have been a top issue here, few people paid much attention to the OPs put up daily by a few people. One great poster, finally left, citing a disappointing lack of interest and went on, as many of us do when it comes to issues like this now on DU, to other venues to continue keeping the issue alive. And it IS alive, just because the media left doesn't mean the protests ever stopped or the crackdowns and the arrests and the militarized cops on the streets doing what they did to OWS.
What I found interesting was how a few people here DID try to politicize it, but few of them were anywhere to be found last year on thos Ferguson threads. Not really interested I guess.
So yes, there are people whose only interest in issues is to promote their candidates. I eg, did not do that when AAs were furious with Hillary and all over Social Media were slamming her after her insensitive remark at the Black Church. I and others certainly could have posted OP after OP showing how she was losing the support of AAs.
But we did not. So the contrast re Bernie from some of Hillary's supporters who day after day tried to drag it out, was amazing.
But when you have been involved in something for years and watch people who never were interested, suddenly showing all this 'concern' you know it is not an issue they care about and won't, once it is no longer valuable to them politicially.
Meanting for decades, the killing of AAs by cops has only gotten worse and won't be fixed by politicians, it hasn't been and they've had ample time to do it.
Bernie refused to slam Hillary over her remark when prodded to do so by a corporate stooge. He was angry that they were making it a political issue, but sadly, Hillary's camp didn't react the same way towards him.
He has always been involved in this issue, way more so than any other candidate in this race, for decades. He has many friends in the AA community and people are going to be surprised at how much support he is getting from that community. But you'd never know it here, nor is it important.
Same people don't seem to be cheering for BLM anymore though. Since the protested Hillary.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)n/t
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)about it. But it did, and it was vile. We are NOT talking about the issue itself, we are talking the deliberate efforts to use something that has been ongoing for decades, having shown no interest in it previously, regardless of WHAT the issue is for their own personal agenda.
I am very glad to see that this vile tactic has spectacularly failed, such tactics should never be rewarded. And it has left a very bad impression of those who TRIED to USE such a serious issue as this, for their own personal agendas.
Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #54)
KMOD This message was self-deleted by its author.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)s of black males from voting.. Stand your ground is nothing more that legalized lynching. Black lives matter, All lives matter, Some less than others.. I've seen race play every part of my life all my life on the news and any other place. I do not seeing it leaving soon.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)HRC is an IT genius.
c'mon. Many posters here couldn't post a video or a picture if there life depended on it, and you expect HRC to be sophisticated enough to understand the nitty gritty of IT work? Hell, I know what it means, but only because my husband is an IT security geek. And by the way, it's very hard to wipe a server clean, unless you really know what you are doing. My husband could retrieve stuff from supposedly wiped servers.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)to try to assert that she actually doesn't know what "wipe a server" means- really?? No, she's not an IT genius, but she is, by all accounts, pretty fuckin' sharp. Again, Wellseley commencement speaker, Watergate lawyer, pictured sitting steely-eyed in the situation room as OBL was found, etc...
I mean, if she really doesn't understand about "wiping a server" maybe she shouldn't be in a job with access to sensitive classified materials.
But I don't for one second believe that's really the case. She might not be proficient at the actual process of wiping the server, but she sure as shit knows what the expression means, and she I suspect had she wanted to give an answer as to whether it was done at her direction, she would have done so.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)most people don't seem to understand this email brouhaha in general.
.
They hear talking heads, and republicans talking about it on the news and they're like "ohhhhh, that sounds bad".
The whole thing is a freakin' joke. What on earth do people think she was emailing.
Wiping the server, subpoenaing the server, are just terms to make this sound like a big scary deal.
It's a big piece of shit story custom made for people who don't understand it, and who don't like the Clintons.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)because I suspect she'll be our nominee.
I also understand why the Clintons have a reflexive, almost obsessive seeming need for secrecy. I remember Ken Starr spending 3 years in their underwear drawer. I get it.
But there are a few things going on, here: One is, it admittedly was a bad decision on her part to not keep work and private email separate. That seems pretty obvious, although there's nothing anyone can do about it now. But then add in "we arbitrarily decided what material we thought was relevant, handed that over, and did our darnedest to erase everything else before FBI investigators could look at it" and you can start to see why it's not just clueless people who might start to have second thoughts, but obviously some people fairly high up in our party organization.
I mean, surely you don't think the sudden massive uptick in noise about a Biden campaign just landed out of the blue, do you?
These are not stupid people.
I honestly think that what Hillary Clinton needs to do, what would be best for her chances of winning the White House, would be to stop thinking and operating like a Clinton. You look around at the big problems many people here have with her and her campaign (if you can acknowledge that not ALL of it is just "irrational Clinton-hate" I would wager that much of the wariness on the part of people like myself- who, again, not only has a long history of defending the Clintons, but could see supporting her in the primaries- has to do with watching her yet again run an overly "safe", poll-tested campaign, utterly refusing to give a concrete answer on potentially "controversial" issues which the beltway pundits try to ignore, but a lot of people feel strongly about.
And in dealing with stuff like the email situation- legit or not- same deal; she can't pretend like actually addressing this stuff is a mere annoyance, a speed bump on the road to the nomination. It appears, from her comments in Iowa, that she's understanding that.
840high
(17,196 posts)Does he facebook, tweet, instagram? This is too funny. LMAO
840high
(17,196 posts)I call him. He started using a computer when he was 7 years old.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)but that doesn't mean diddly-squat as far as this supposed story.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)and it's so ridiculous I thought heck yeah, he must be a virulent racist, that' why I donated to his campaign and intend to do ground work for him in racist Kentucky.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)You know who else had white people show up to his rallies? Hitler, that's who.
Uncle Joe
(59,634 posts)Thanks for the thread, MannyGoldstein.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)murielm99
(31,205 posts)Why have this poll? Some of us have criticisms of Sanders. This is not the way to present them.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)murielm99
(31,205 posts)I have never seen him called that here.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Not to mention you rec'd an op that not only called Bernie a racist but also used a racial slur.
murielm99
(31,205 posts)I answered the first part of that post, which I agreed with.
I will not apologize to someone who continually smears Hillary Clinton and looks for trouble anywhere they can find it.
And I believe that post was removed? You have nothing further to complain about.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Yes, you have.
Just because it was hidden doesn't mean it didn't happen.
murielm99
(31,205 posts)As I have said, I have had enough of your harassment.
Admit I am wrong? You are wrong about everything from your smears of Hillary to your choice of candidate. Leave me alone.
I admit nothing to your continual needling and nitpicking.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Harassment?
You asked a question and I answered it.
You don't get to demand I stop replying to you because you didn't like the answer.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)romanic
(2,841 posts)Now do a poll for Hillary.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Thanks for letting the mask slip, voters.
Why not tell us why Bernie's a racist?
MoveIt
(399 posts)Racist
2 (2%)
stonecutter357, Sancho
Virulent racist
2 (2%)
Puzzledtraveller, mr_liberal
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)steve2470
(37,461 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)"they are aware of what race of people are most likely to use these words."
Calls him a Jewish racist and throws in the Yiddish n-word for good measure.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)schwartza
Yiddish or German term meaning "black person". It is not a hateful term.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=schwartza
schvartze
[shvahr-tsuh; English shvahrt-suh]
Spell Syllables
noun, Yiddish: Often Disparaging.
1.
a term used by some Jewish people to refer to a black person.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/schvartze
i do nto get most of that post. i do not even get his point. i looked up the word. yiddish for black. looked at other sites like yahoo question. none of them said it was derogatory, or that it meant the n word.
saying black people know what race uses the word? i would imagine. it is yiddish.
but... what ever. k. so... i dunno. his post was not clear to me
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Their point was to call Bernie a racist.
They thought they could get away with it by using a Yiddish racial slur.
That is the point.
reddread
(6,896 posts)of the woo tang klan
who seem to hold odd beliefs about demographics and politics.
why do people engage in non issues with non factual speculation?
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed