2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSo Hillary has started lobbing digs at Bernie.
Last edited Fri Sep 4, 2015, 10:40 PM - Edit history (3)
Hillary Clinton on Bernie Sanders: Waving Your Arms Doesnt Mean a LotYou can wave your arms and give a speech but at the end of the day are you connecting with and really hearing what people are either saying to you or wishing that you would say to them? Mrs. Clinton told MSNBCs Andrea Mitchell on Friday, without directly naming Mr. Sanders.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/09/04/hillary-clinton-on-bernie-sanders-waving-your-arms-doesnt-mean-a-lot/
ON EDIT: I'm adding the portion of the transcript of the Hillary interview that includes Andrea Mitchell's question, and Hillary's answer, up to and including the "waving arms around" bit. Now people can decide for them selves, if Hillary's comment was aimed at Bernie, at least partially, or not.
Interview Transcript
AM: Looking at the campaign now you see huge crowds for Bernie Sanders and for Donald Trump, and people talking about Joe Biden having an opening if he decides to make a difficult choice on an emotional level. They talk about how authentic these campaigns are. (Hillary laughs)
Does it hurt you when people say youre too lawyerly, you parse your words, youre not authentic, youre not connecting.
HRC: Well, thats just not my experience, out campaigning. I feel very, very good about where we are.
Weve built a terrific organization in the early States, and were expanding into those States that will be after Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Nevada.
The level of support, the intensity of support that Im experiencing as I speak with people, and talking about issues that I, I know are on their minds.
I want to be the President who deals with all those big problems that are in the headlines, but also those problems that keep families up at night, and thats why I started out listening.
Because I think you can come with your own ideas, and you can, you know, wave your arms and give a speech, but at the end of the day are you connecting with and really hearing what people are either really saying to you of wishing that you would say to them.
ON FURTHER EDIT:
apparently Team Bernie got the message and responded, here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251570958
I still think this is laughable, because Bernie IS listening to voters REAL concerns, and staking
out the Progressive high-ground on real issues effecting their lives, rather than attacking Hillary,
like every reporter has tried to get him to do.
GO BERNIE!!
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Go Bernie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)"are you connecting with and really hearing what people are either saying to you or wishing that you would say to them?
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)... continue to rule:
now
tomorrow
and FOREVAH !!!!
Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)Countdown to "Shame on you Bernie Sanders"...3,2,1...
i love the smell of desperation in the morning.
kairos12
(13,590 posts)ruffburr
(1,190 posts)Like the pot calling the kettle black, (Hope that's politically correct just an old saying)
Control-Z
(15,686 posts)in the same question, iirc. Sounded more like she was talking about trump.
olddots
(10,237 posts)Before you alert prove me wrong .
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)chained up in the dungeon in the Goldman Sachs building.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I can just picture this!
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)There's still CONTENT in this! WTF are we paying you for? Try again, pigs!"
"Yessir Lord Blankfein. We'll do better next time, we promise."
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)Either you believe in the concept of evolving with regards to this subject or you dont..
cali
(114,904 posts)riversedge
(80,810 posts)please.
Andrea was talking about all 3 in her question. And shame on NYTimes!! for leaving out the context.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/09/04/1418549/-Unfiltered-Hillary-The-Andrea-Mitchell-Interview-9-4-15-v-1-0
On authenticity and connecting with voters:
AM: Looking at the campaign now you see huge crowds for Bernie Sanders and for Donald Trump, and people talking about Joe Biden having an opening if he decides to make a difficult choice on an emotional level. They talk about how authentic these campaigns are.
HRC: (Laughs)
AM: Does it hurt you when people say youre too lawyerly, you parse your words, youre not authentic, youre not connecting.
HRC: Well, thats just not my experience, out campaigning. I feel very, very good about where we are.
Weve built a terrific organization in the early States, and were expanding into those States that will be after Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Nevada.
The level of support, the intensity of support that Im experiencing as I speak with people, and talking about issues that I, I know are on their minds.
I want to be the President who deals with all those big problems that are in the headlines, but also those problems that keep families up at night, and thats why I started out listening.
Because I think you can come with your own ideas, and you can, you know, wave your arms and give a speech, but at the end of the day are you connecting with and really hearing what people are either really saying to you of wishing that you would say to them.
So, on everything from mental health issue to substance abuse to college affordability to the continuing struggles that families face in spite of the fact that weve got a recovery and unemployment's down, people arent feeling it.
I am very excited, and very energized, by the campaign that Im running.
And you know, after Labor Day you kind of move more toward the laying out of your plans and moving toward debates. and having the exchanges that you expect in a campaign.
Thats the next stage and Im looking forward to that.
livetohike
(24,282 posts)comments! Some people are a bit touchy. Wonder why
.
riversedge
(80,810 posts)SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)He's out there waving his arms like a buffoon.
riversedge
(80,810 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)riversedge
(80,810 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Exact same arguments about crowds, mmmmmm
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Hillary was NASTY in her attacks on presidential candidate Obama. Nasty.
riversedge
(80,810 posts)cycle.
INdemo
(7,024 posts)and I have to tell you I got to your post and it brought laughter ..That was/is funny..Yep Hillary/Bill had nothing to do with the Rev Wright episode either...just sayin'
840high
(17,196 posts)JohnnyLib2
(11,333 posts)Seems obvious to me that she was talking about all 3. Lots of overreaction going on.....
riversedge
(80,810 posts)Pharaoh
(8,209 posts)to say absolutely nothing!!
People are sick of that crap!
riversedge
(80,810 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)yet a certain crowd just knew it was "their" candidate by that odd description. Guilty much?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)sad, really
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)REAL concerns are stuff like the US having the highest rate of
childhood poverty of any industrialized nation, or the highest
mass incarceration rate, or ... you get the idea.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)And she went on to talk about Trump attacking her aid Hume. I think I would walk back on this.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)not Biden. Not Trump. That was obvious to the NYTimes writer,
and it's obvious to me. and the damage is done. How convenient that
there is plausible deniability.
She went on and talked about a lot of things, but she still said what
she said. The transcript is there. It is what it is. decide for yourself.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Why in the hell does Hillary want to take digs at a Democrat?
Watch this and see if you see Trump waving his arms
https://m.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)who could only 1/2 fill his "big crowd" stunt.
If this was NOT about Bernie, Hillary's smart enough to know how to make that clear.
she could have said .. "well I've known Bernie for many years, and respect his work
i the Senat .. etc. etc". like Bernie does when MRM tries to get him to take a dig at
Hills But she didn't..
It doesn't pass the smell test, that "oh she didn't mean Bernie" when his name was
the FIRST one AM mentioned and when he's Hill's ONLY serious contender right now.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Bragged about his game in Alabama and how he had to keep moving to larger places. Dont glorify Trump, he loves his stand up comedy routine. Do you think Bernie as a stand up comedian, I doubt you do, dont put Bernie in the same class as Trump.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)AM did, and Hilary obliged her, with her scatter-gun put-down,
that clearly included Bernie. Hell, Bernie is her ONLY serious
contender right now. to say Hills was ONLY talking about Trump
and Biden is just silly.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)zappaman
(20,627 posts)Isn't she?
riversedge
(80,810 posts)could be talking about anyone. Or any of the 3 that Andrea addressed in her question. NYTimes left out the context
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)I'd like to think she was JUST talking about Trump, but the context included BOTH
Trump and Sanders.
I hope she corrects the record if she meant otherwise.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)quickesst
(6,309 posts)....more tears to fill the raging river. Bernie's gonna have to build a boat to get from rally to rally.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Her supporters have been doing it all along.
SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)You don't want to go there.
jalan48
(14,914 posts)The 1% interviewing the 1%. No arm waving needed here-just a few winks and nods.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)How much has Bernie spent on polling?
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)But I will say, I've seen her wave her arms around as well. Just sayin. She may be listening, but it's the ''doing'' I'm worried about. But then that's the chance we take with any candidate on either side.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)and draw their own conclusion.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251570890
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)dsc
(53,397 posts)your post was frankly blatantly dishonest before you did.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Now I'm no big fan of NYTimes, but can't help wondering ..
where is the outrage at the NYTimes "dishonest" headline?
.. which is about all 1/2 the readers will remember?
Is Team Hillary going to correct the newspaper of record on
their "blatantly dishonest" headline?
dsc
(53,397 posts)and most Bernie supporters have been doing quite the opposite. I am glad we agree the Times is a mess but again, this is by no means a new position for me.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Is Team Hillary going to correct the newspaper of record on
their "blatantly dishonest" headline?
When THIS ^ happens, I'll be more than happy to self-delete.
dsc
(53,397 posts)as they have on many issue one of two things happen, they change what they wrote or they don't. When they do Bernie supporters claim the Times caved, when they don't, they don't change it. I have no idea if they complained about the headline or not, but given the Times behavior it would be a full time job for them to complain about the Times behavior. But you could have done your own work, you could have watched the interview (it was hidden on video on their website so I understand it was hard to find) but instead you chose not to do that and post what the Times wrote without checking. Why that is my fault is beyond me especially when I repeatedly told people here that the Times hated Clinton and told lies about her routinely.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)it would clear the air.
Listen, I've posted the transcript of what was actually said.
People can and will now draw their own conclusions. period.
riversedge
(80,810 posts)write ups of her and her campaign.
senz
(11,945 posts)and most Bernie supporters have been doing quite the opposite.
ALL Bernie supporters who are aware of the NYTimes have been doing the same.
riversedge
(80,810 posts)great if you would edit your subject line
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)give it a rest.
Eko
(9,993 posts)Three people are mentioned. Really, really bad argument. I would say I amazed but from what Ive seen here lately I am not.
INdemo
(7,024 posts)and 1996 Doesn't it appear as this statement is scripted by Bill and Hillary even sounded like she was doing just that, reading from a script
and one has to admit, pretty good at getting in that dig.... It Bill's style even
"I think you can come with your own ideas, and you can, you know, wave your arms and give a speech, but at the end of the day are you connecting with and really hearing what people are either really saying to you of wishing that you would say to them." (yep Bill Clinton Sept 4 2015)
But the Bernie Sanders Campaign wasted no time with their response and it was great
Way to go Bernie.
And yes Bernie has taken the high ground and Thank You for posting this
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Good observation you make too.
I just saw another clip on the TeeVee of another portion of
the Andrea Mitchell interview, where Hillary characterizes
her political rivals as "bombastic and ideological".
But of course it was embedded -- like a little land mine --
in an otherwise palatable warm narrative.
FloridaBlues
(4,668 posts)BlueStateLib
(937 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Well, the fact all your stops are pre-screened and ziplock-tight security might help with that.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)You know, the people she wants to vote for her.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)and Hillary haz a sadz....
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Eko
(9,993 posts)where her campaign put that out your point is irrelevant and off topic from this entire post. It would be easy for me to find supporters of other candidates using subtle digs and worse. It has nothing to do with what their campaigns release and it seems as if you are using this thread to bash Clinton.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)You could add as many layers as you want to but until it is something a campaign put out and not their supporters it has nothing to do with the campaign.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)
denigrate Sander's large crowds.
The sad truth is that Hillary could not amass a large crowd like that, without a celebrity or a rock-star doing the gig with her.
I live in Iowa, and she has not been doing large-venue (or even medium-sized venue) speeches. I think the optics would be embarrassing and very telling--considering that Sanders is drawing huge crowds.
At the Iowa State Fair, Bernie drew a packed, overflowing crowd when he gave a speech on the "soapbox." This is an Iowa State Fair tradition that politicians campaigning in their primaries give a speech on the soapbox. Hillary skipped the soapbox. She meandered around the crowd, talking to people.
I think it's clear that she's not gathering huge crowds, as Sanders is.
This meme is an attempt to put a negative spin on Sander's popularity. Very bizarre, indeed.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)ashling
(25,771 posts)upon reading the context that you posted, I do not see this as a "nasty little dig at Bernie"
1) The question clearly included Donald Trump
2) There is nothing particularly nasty in what she said
It may be worth noting, but I think your depiction is overblown
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)so people can decide for themselves. I respect your opinion,
but respectfully disagree.
At this point in the campaign, Hillary has only ONE serious contender,
though you wouldn't know it from the M$M's lack of coverage for
Bernie. And that ONE serious contender is BERNIE SANDERS.
Not Trump, he's in the GOP primary. Not Biden. He has not announced.
It was aimed at Bernie IMHO, but peeps will just need to read the
words, and decide for themselves.
tavernier
(14,443 posts)She is not referencing Bernie.
Are we so anxious to wipe out all of our team before we even have our own debates?? Please stop being stupid!!! As much as they eat their own, the teapublicans are salivating for juicer meat!
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)I'm not retracting what is clearly already in the public record, it's
only what AM & HRC actually said.
You could try stopping your candidate from taking not-so-subtle digs
at Sanders. Now that might actually help achieve your stated aims,
of not "eating our own".
840high
(17,196 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Those huge crowds that Bernie draws are because he's NOT connecting with and really hearing what people are either really saying to him or wishing that he would say to them.
They simply think Sanders is giving away free marijuana cigarettes, known as "joints" or "spliffs".
MisterP
(23,730 posts)or is it a different concoction? will it make your children engage in strenuous dancing and heavy petting if one or both parents took some in the past?
ejbr
(5,892 posts)I also might add that the nature of the question also seems to challenge her to demonstrate why another candidate may not be as "attractive" as she. Given how the question was phrased, her response does seem rather tepid.
senz
(11,945 posts)From Politico today:
And, of course, Sen. Claire McCaskill with her "socialist" smears.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/hillary-clinton-2016-proxies-attack-bernie-sanders-213359
Just as dirty as 2008. This might be worth another OP...
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Please feel free to take that article for an OP because I still feel too new for that sort of thing. Or if you don't want to do it, let's share it w/someone else. It's interesting & people should be aware of it.
senz
(11,945 posts)There's a thread now in the Bernie group.
This place is so complicated.
Gothmog
(179,857 posts)The fact that this comment by Hiillary Clinton has you so upset is sad
senz
(11,945 posts)She finds his huge crowds amusing, right? And she's sure her sagging poll numbers are caused by something other than Bernie. Which, come to think of it, they might be...
Gothmog
(179,857 posts)Go read Nate Silver. http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/bernie-sanders-new-hampshire/
There are other indications that Sanders is unlikely to win the nomination. He hasnt won a single endorsement from a governor, senator or member of the U.S. House of Representatives (unlike Obama at this point in the 2008 campaign). Sanders is also well behind in the money race (again, unlike Obama). These indicators havent changed over the past month.
But even if you put aside those metrics, Sanders is running into the problem that other insurgent Democrats have in past election cycles. You can win Iowa relying mostly on white liberals. You can win New Hampshire. But as Gary Hart and Bill Bradley learned, you cant win a Democratic nomination without substantial support from African-Americans.
senz
(11,945 posts)As for Bernie's support with AAs, when people have been abused as long as they have, it takes a while to warm up to a new unknown guy. But when they learn Bernie's history and hear his thoughts on issues relating to poc, they'll warm up to him. Because he's he real deal. He cares.
The Clintons, despite their 1% standing and following, are still considered known quantities. But when people learn more about them, they might change their minds.
Reality doesn't go away.
pansypoo53219
(23,034 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)Accuse someone else of doing what YOU are doing yourself (in spades). Diverts attention. Makes someone else look guilty instead.
