2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton now has as many weighted endorsement points as Obama had the day he clinched the nom
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Now, let's all unite behind our candidate.
SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)That's the point of all this: Defeating Republicans.
Response to SonderWoman (Reply #5)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)Response to SonderWoman (Reply #10)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)So if you're content with President Bernie and 70 Republican senators then so be it.
Response to SonderWoman (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Capn Sunshine
(14,378 posts)and not the mess I'm seeing at the moment.
Tad Devine has a plan. But he won't share it with us at this point. Us being the establishment Dems that actually make the machinery function.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)People have Never bought the narrative, no matter how much she's shoved down our throats, kinda like Poppy Bush.
revmclaren
(2,613 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)revmclaren
(2,613 posts)Clinton is just fine in the real world. Already have 57 people who are now backing Clinton in my own circle, and. I don't start jumping into the fray until next month. I'm GTVO for Clinton off line.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)political sense. She can line them up from here to Mars but in the end she needs the votes. That is the only game that matters.
revmclaren
(2,613 posts)My reasons for supporting Clinton are deeply personal for me and my family. Your support of sanders prob equally so. All that matters is to GTVO. NO REPUBS IN THE OVAL OFFICE.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)The point is to find and elect the best possible candidate. However, it's very unlikely that the best possible candidate would be a Republican.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Straight White man?
Because if you werent....The point IS beating the Republicans
My god...they have the freaking bases loaded..the only thing they cant control now is the veto pen...you want the rest of us to risk that for your "moral high ground?
To I and millions.of others...You damn Skippy thats the POINT!
ladjf
(17,320 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)two or three or more great candidates just have it out and the best man or Woman win.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)to tell us who to vote for via high profile endorsements after a low profile campaign season. Anything else is just too risky.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)It is simply party establishment endorsing their establishment candidate.
SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)Okay.
Response to SonderWoman (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)I think that above posters comment would go over better there.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)Democratic (we'll stipulate we know what that one means)
Underground: Which has some subtle and some straight-forward meanings which I will paste here:
noun
10. the place or region beneath the surface of the ground.
11. an underground space or passage.
12. a secret organization fighting the established government or occupation forces:
He fought in the French underground during the Nazi occupation of France.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/underground?s=t
I bolded the one that I feel is most applicable to your confusion.
If you are more interested in the establishment, try http://www.democrats.org/
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Most here are working hard to change the establishment that has gotten us into terrible wars, allowed Wall Street to steal our wealth, and decimated our environment. Maybe you are ignoring the Princeton Report that laid it out how we are now living in an Oligarchy. The establishment is the oligarchy. We need change like Obama promised, but for real this time.
Please vote against Goldman-Sachs and for the people's candidate Sen Sanders.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)IndependentUnderground either!
Hung on your own petard!
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #49)
Name removed Message auto-removed
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Has he changed his profile on his wikipedia to fit this make belief you have going on yet? Do you have a single shred of evidence that HE thinks he is a Democrat?
"As far as your concerned" is not valid when you DON'T have a shred of evidence that supports that "theory". You see there is nothing in the by laws that require you to be a Democrat to run ..ipso facto....it doesnt make you one either. Sanders is exploiting that loophole...
Add to the fact that not a single one of his Democratic colleagues have endorsed him....
Add to that he has not called himself one and in fact outright said he isnt one....
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #63)
Name removed Message auto-removed
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)He doesnt even consider himself one...STILL
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #66)
Name removed Message auto-removed
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Go look for yourself....i will stand here and wait for you to produce one piece of evidence that HE believes he is a Democrat..."go now...and prove it"
Double dog dare you to try....
angrychair
(12,285 posts)But Bernie is a Democratic Socialist, still a Democrat.
Second, he is a declared, registered, 2016 canidate as a Democratic Party canidate, for president of the United States.
For help: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders_presidential_campaign,_2016
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)Day 2, even!
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)eom
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)If you say so...
Already advising people where to go is an endearing quality. We def need more of that.
revmclaren
(2,613 posts)Boy do you know how to pick those you support!
Makes me wonder about your choice of candidate as well.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Cha
(319,079 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)While Hillary was busy voting for the Iraq war and trying to persuade others to vote the same way, posters here on DU were showing in well documented detail that the entire rationale for war was built entirely of lies, something you never ever heard on the M$M.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Bag" is all about garbage and not the bag.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Capn Sunshine
(14,378 posts)Are we the enemy or is T Rump?
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)riversedge
(80,811 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)And of course, those are not like votes from regular people, the super delegates can change anytime between now and the convention.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Response to SonderWoman (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)That endorsements don't matter and campaign finance doesn't matter and low odds of winning doesnt matter....and lack of Black votes doesnt matter...and lack of hispanic and women voters doesnt matter...and on and on and on
Capn Sunshine
(14,378 posts)Right now? I'm seeing you make all these pronouncements but give me a straight line to delegate victory in Philly next July.
So far, it sounds a lot like the Underwear Gnome's business plan.
Here are the cold facts:
On Ground Take:
1st or 2nd in New Hampshah
1st or 2nd in Iowa
Then what?
Nevada? you're polling @ 26%
S Carolina: average as of 8/3
Clinton 67.0
Biden 10.5
Sanders 9.0
O'Malley 2.0
Webb 1.5
Spread Clinton +56.5
You'll need a major miracle there
Then Comes
Alabama - last poll
Hillary Clinton Bernie Sanders
78% 34%<------this is an oultlier, most at 10% but I'm staying positive
Better hit the ground running
Arkansas- Hillary is at 70% in her home state
Colorado -we have bigger problems there structurally; Rubio is leading any Dem. The latest is
Hillary 38 Bernie 37 - so a toss up
Georgia
Hillary 51%
Bernie 24%
Massachusetts
Hillary 43%
Bernie 34% ---- Sanders gaining at last flash poll taken Friday
Minnesota
Hillary 50%
Bernie 34% -- some forward momentum in the last Flash Poll, 9/1
N. Carolina
Hillary 55%
Bernie 20%
Oklahoma
Damned if there's enough Democrats to poll..no data available
That only takes you through March 1. Seeing a trend? If you hope to prevail beyond IA and NH, you have your work cut out for you. A HUGE ground effort is needed. ASAP. This isn't happening by magic. And conservatively, you'll need to raise another 12 million to keep the machine going.
If I were you, I'd start working on a plan to match the grand pronouncements being made by Sanders partisans. Right now it's just not up to snuff.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)There are a lot of people that want change and recognize that H. Clinton is business as usual.
Capn Sunshine
(14,378 posts)Either Hillary or Bernie will get us farther down the progressive road, and at this point Hillary might actually be better at it because of her experience and connections.
Should Bernie win, Hillary will work just as hard with him so that he has a handle on things.
By The way, I'm going to post this above in GD P. Sanders Campaign needs to stop all the back slapping and get the F to work.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)She is mego rich and all her friends are in the 1% and she has close ties to the billionaires. Why do you think she gives a shit about us peons? Of course she wants our votes, but she has zero integrity. She has never dealt with her share of responsibility for the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent Iraq children. Does that not mean anything to you? She brushes it off as a mistake.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)She is to the right of the President that describes his economic policies as "mainstream 1980s Republican" and admits "that in many ways, Nixon was more Liberal" than he is.
The Koch brothers have been incredibly successful since they helped fund the DLC and infiltrated the party in dragging it rightward. The successor organizations, Third Way chief amongst them, have continued the cause of adopting Republican economic issues while occasionally throwing the left a sop on social issues they don't give a damn about.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Thank goodness Hillary in quite as annoying as her supporters.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)She has experience at running a primary campaign. And we see the results.
Response to upaloopa (Reply #13)
Name removed Message auto-removed
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)we can talk it over again.
Response to upaloopa (Reply #21)
Name removed Message auto-removed
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I'll damn sure take that bet!
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #59)
Name removed Message auto-removed
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Because sir....the odds are against you.....the chance you dont eat it.....is slim and none...
You going to bet against a football team with a 74% chance of getting in the Playoffs...against a team with only a 5% chance?
Do you play poker?
What are the odds of drawing an inside straight?
revmclaren
(2,613 posts)He now became NAME REMOVED. No crow for now. Maybe in his next incarnation.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Darn....
revmclaren
(2,613 posts)types of s@&t. Next time.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Last edited Tue Sep 8, 2015, 08:42 PM - Edit history (1)
He has a 5% shot in the General and 12% in the Primary...
Yes she is going to be VERY hard to beat....she has a 57% chance of winning the General and 74% the Primary...
Yeah buddy.....thats tough to beat...
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)ibegurpard
(17,081 posts)Endorsements at this point are simply a tool for the Clinton campaign to try to spread the inevitability message. I don't care if God herself endorses her...I'm not supporting her until the last primary is over.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)the Revolutionary War would have been over faster. As long as there were planes or balloons too, of course.
Or helicopters or rockets.
OK, maybe they could fire the paratroopers from cannon. Or slingshots.
You get the idea.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)
askew
(1,464 posts)Unlike regular delegates, super delegates aren't binding. In fact, in 2008 many switched their endorsement from Clinton to Obama. The fact that Hillary and her supporters are bragging about irrelevant stats like this is kinda sad.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)This isn't 2008
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Because he has next to none
..and part of the reason he has a 5% chance
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...of winning an election based on voters and policy ever cross your mind? Or are elections all about:
Rigging debate schedules using surrogates (corruption)
Insulting supporters of other candidates as 'racist's
Threatening to throw the election by dividing the electorate along gender and race lines
Relying on 'endorsements' instead of votes
Poll extrapolation
Strawman attacks
Using surrogates to throw stink bombs from the right
Storming the opposing candidates speeches throwing stink bombs and spewing filth
Claiming the opposing candidates supporters are, 'white supremacists'
Money from billionaires and bankers
Free beauty and cleaning products for women
etc
Or are they won by having the best ideas and best record?
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Don't wait up.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)actual weight to most voters and they certainly are not totaled up as points to some conclusion. Delegates count, and there are two sorts, pledged delegates and unpledged delegates. Each of them has a single vote, each with an identical value.
All of this lingo manufacture has got to cease. We have elections, most of us have seen elections before. 'Weighted endorsement points' or 'shimmery glitter beans'? Lingo, we make it up for to fit the duty.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)GO Bernie !!
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Do we just pluck her crown out of the hawthorn bush, crown her, and call it a day? Call off the primaries?
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)is no basis for a system of government!"
zappaman
(20,627 posts)"Why is that?"
"He hasn't got shit all over him!"
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)As when he crowned himself Emperor of the French when the then-current pope refused to perform the honors.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Democrats. Not a good strategy if they want to win the general. But they, like Goldman-Sachs, don't really care as long as it's Bush or Clinton, Clinton or Bush.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Autumn
(48,962 posts)I give a fucks to give out.
cali
(114,904 posts)She is not generating any enthusiasm with anyone that I know.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)They are part of the old failed order. Sanders is here to change all that.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Bernie will dynamite the tracks, so to speak. They know which side of the hread the butter is on.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)SouthernProgressive
(1,810 posts)It's wonderful to have a powerful and unapologetic woman leading the way with so many good people getting behind her. We are witnessing history being written and it will be a good book. This is exciting. At this point it looks like she will be virtually unchallenged without the second place person getting in the race.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)eom