Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is this necessary? (Original Post)
madamesilverspurs
Sep 2015
OP
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)1. Only to describe a behavior.
never an appearance.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)2. judging by the font, I thought this was another Santorum sign.

I don't get it.
(If the question is about the word "Fugly", sure, it's mean, but then so is just plain old "ugly".
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)3. The Fugs are necessary.
But I am not sure of what context you are referring to?
The word itself doesn't bother me.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)4. Well, now I want ...

bvf
(6,604 posts)5. I was kind of surprised to find it here:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fugly?s=t
Did not expect that.
And I agree, for behavior, I could see it.
Not to be nosy, but is there a reason you're asking?
Did not expect that.
And I agree, for behavior, I could see it.
Not to be nosy, but is there a reason you're asking?
