2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI don't agree with this writer from the Daily Banter about Bernie.
http://thedailybanter.com/2015/09/face-it-sanders-fans-youd-turn-on-bernie-in-a-heartbeat-if-he-actually-won-the-white-house/I'll leave it up to you. I don't dismiss Obama because he has not done exactly what I wanted. I am a pragmatists:
If theres anything weve learned from the presidency of Barack Obama its that a lot of self-described progressives are petulant children for whom no candidate will ever be good enough, fair-weather friends who are more than happy to support a candidate but who turn up their noses as soon as he or she is put in a position of actual governance. See, theres no such thing as an elected official who will give you everything you want, and more than any other partisan bent its the left that reacts terribly to not getting every single thing it wants. The left loves to ignore inconvenient political reality and the impact of political reality is simply an inevitability for elected officials.
And this stuff:
A President Bernie Sanders just wouldnt be able to do a lot of what he wants to. And his supporters in particular likely arent the kind of people who tolerate being let down, given that theyre trained to expect the worst from those in authority and the liberal tendency toward independence and means theyre somewhat famous for killing their idols in that position. Hell, Barack Obama is the most progressive president this country has seen since FDR and yet many of the hardliners on the left still arent willing to give him a break. All it would take is a couple of drone strikes by a President Sanders a man suddenly in the position to potentially understand the value of them and a deal with Congress thats nothing more than a best-he-can-do and the knives would come out, the Tweets would pile up, and cries of betrayal would echo off every flat surface in D.C.
WTF? That's not me.
flamingdem
(40,891 posts)Especially regarding foreign policy.
marlakay
(13,282 posts)He said Bernie won't be able to do anything.
I said Bernie is older, he isn't looking for a big job when he retires from president. I think congress will get his point when he stays tough and vetos more.
He will be like president Johnson who said my way or else and got a lot passed.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)dsc
(53,397 posts)then won the largest vote share at least since FDR and maybe since Monroe ran unopposed and had an immense majority in Congress that he pulled in. In 1968 when he was a lame duck he couldn't get what he wanted.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)dsc
(53,397 posts)Truman had a foreign policy that would make us irate 24/7 as did Kennedy and Johnson. You can make the case Truman and Johnson were more liberal on economic issues but Obama is more liberal of foreign policy and civil rights than either of them. And he is way more economically liberal than Carter was.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Capn Sunshine
(14,378 posts)Should Bernie get to this point of Commander in Chief the cries of betrayal will begin almost immediately.
Bernie has already stated he sees the value of drones. If you can avoid boots on the ground and loss of American soldiers it's the way to go. Some here prefer we not ever engage, but that's really not a possibility.
When he signs a jobs bill that contains a ridiculous Republican add-on,like say, a cap on the minimum wage after 15.50 for 15 years, that will cause the howling too.
Comes with the job. It's not "President of the Progressives in the United States" It's President of The United States, including the red ones and the people who did not vote for him.
randome
(34,845 posts)Until we weaken the GOP much further, those are the only 2 options available.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Precision and concision. That's the game.[/center][/font][hr]
Bucky
(55,334 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Obama didn't have the votes for single payer, but he never even tried. But we all saw that he could utilize his bully pulpit for the things he really wants, like TPP. In short, fuck this guy.
Uncle Joe
(65,134 posts)"Let me tell you right now what no other candidate will tell you. And that is, no one who is elected President of the United States can do it alone. No one in the White House will have the power to take on Wall Street alone, Corporate America alone, the billionaire class alone. The only way that change takes place, is when we develope that strong grass roots movement. Make that political revolution, stand together, and then we bring about change."
https://go.berniesanders.com/page/event/detail/july29organizingmeetingat7pmetpt/wrqj
Thanks for the thread, rusty quoin.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)If Bernie became president, one of two things would happen:
1) He would accomplish nothing.
2) He would compromise and end up with accomplishments similar to Obama's (although probably not as many), and then get thrown under the bus.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I would be considered an Obama die-hard. I voted for him in the primaries in 2008. I supported him over Clinton.
Do I think he could have done more? Sure. He should have started negotiations from the left and not the center.
Do I think he could do everything I wanted? No. He had the worst Congress in my lifetime for most of his presidency.
Am I allowed to criticize him and still like him? You're damn straight I can.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)"You liberals suck ass. Now vote for the Democrat!"
Bucky
(55,334 posts)I don't think the writer understands that democracy is about participating, not just voting and then silently obeying.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)should not be attributed to one group of political followers. Besides, the numbers of those sympathetic to what Bernie wants to accomplish range far beyond those this person imagines to be "hardliners on the left."
This guy clearly does not realize, or want to admit, that we intend to continue what we started when we elected President Obama. And that "we" includes solid majorities of all Americans who voted in the last two presidential elections.