Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rusty quoin

(6,133 posts)
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 12:06 AM Sep 2015

I don't agree with this writer from the Daily Banter about Bernie.

http://thedailybanter.com/2015/09/face-it-sanders-fans-youd-turn-on-bernie-in-a-heartbeat-if-he-actually-won-the-white-house/

I'll leave it up to you. I don't dismiss Obama because he has not done exactly what I wanted. I am a pragmatists:

If there’s anything we’ve learned from the presidency of Barack Obama it’s that a lot of self-described progressives are petulant children for whom no candidate will ever be good enough, fair-weather friends who are more than happy to support a candidate but who turn up their noses as soon as he or she is put in a position of actual governance. See, there’s no such thing as an elected official who will give you everything you want, and more than any other partisan bent it’s the left that reacts terribly to not getting every single thing it wants. The left loves to ignore inconvenient political reality — and the impact of political reality is simply an inevitability for elected officials.

And this stuff:

A President Bernie Sanders just wouldn’t be able to do a lot of what he wants to. And his supporters in particular likely aren’t the kind of people who tolerate being let down, given that they’re trained to expect the worst from those in authority and the liberal tendency toward independence and means they’re somewhat famous for killing their idols in that position. Hell, Barack Obama is the most progressive president this country has seen since FDR and yet many of the hardliners on the left still aren’t willing to give him a break. All it would take is a couple of drone strikes by a President Sanders — a man suddenly in the position to potentially understand the value of them — and a deal with Congress that’s nothing more than a best-he-can-do and the knives would come out, the Tweets would pile up, and cries of betrayal would echo off every flat surface in D.C.

WTF? That's not me.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't agree with this writer from the Daily Banter about Bernie. (Original Post) rusty quoin Sep 2015 OP
Valid points flamingdem Sep 2015 #1
I talked to hubby about this today marlakay Sep 2015 #2
I hope, with the right congress. rusty quoin Sep 2015 #5
It helped the Johnson took over for a martyr and was advancing many of the martyrs goals dsc Sep 2015 #9
What tripe. n/t Skwmom Sep 2015 #3
He says that Obama is the most progressive since FDR. That is foolish. rusty quoin Sep 2015 #4
who was more progressive since FDR overall dsc Sep 2015 #10
I'm referring to the comments on Sander supporters. n/t Skwmom Sep 2015 #18
Oh yeah, I totally see this coming down the highway Capn Sunshine Sep 2015 #6
Agree. You either compromise or allow the government to be shut down. randome Sep 2015 #12
Right on. Until we can get more Dems to vote in off-year elections, we'll continue this seesaw gov't Bucky Sep 2015 #15
The difference between Sanders and Obama is that Bernie will at least make an effort.. frylock Sep 2015 #7
Apparently the author hasn't paid attention to Bernie's words. Uncle Joe Sep 2015 #8
Most of his die-hard supporters turned on Obama a long time ago, so, yeah, this writer is correct. DanTex Sep 2015 #11
No. We didn't. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #19
Oh good, it's been a while since we had a nice hippie punching LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #13
a good deal of emotional projection going on there Bucky Sep 2015 #14
Well, at least he didn't call us Reds, Commies, Anarchists, or Hippies. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #16
The disaffection of a worried nation, agitated by a cynical and foolish press, Hortensis Sep 2015 #17

marlakay

(13,282 posts)
2. I talked to hubby about this today
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 12:16 AM
Sep 2015

He said Bernie won't be able to do anything.

I said Bernie is older, he isn't looking for a big job when he retires from president. I think congress will get his point when he stays tough and vetos more.

He will be like president Johnson who said my way or else and got a lot passed.

dsc

(53,397 posts)
9. It helped the Johnson took over for a martyr and was advancing many of the martyrs goals
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 09:09 AM
Sep 2015

then won the largest vote share at least since FDR and maybe since Monroe ran unopposed and had an immense majority in Congress that he pulled in. In 1968 when he was a lame duck he couldn't get what he wanted.

dsc

(53,397 posts)
10. who was more progressive since FDR overall
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 09:11 AM
Sep 2015

Truman had a foreign policy that would make us irate 24/7 as did Kennedy and Johnson. You can make the case Truman and Johnson were more liberal on economic issues but Obama is more liberal of foreign policy and civil rights than either of them. And he is way more economically liberal than Carter was.

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
6. Oh yeah, I totally see this coming down the highway
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 12:34 AM
Sep 2015

Should Bernie get to this point of Commander in Chief the cries of betrayal will begin almost immediately.

Bernie has already stated he sees the value of drones. If you can avoid boots on the ground and loss of American soldiers it's the way to go. Some here prefer we not ever engage, but that's really not a possibility.

When he signs a jobs bill that contains a ridiculous Republican add-on,like say, a cap on the minimum wage after 15.50 for 15 years, that will cause the howling too.

Comes with the job. It's not "President of the Progressives in the United States" It's President of The United States, including the red ones and the people who did not vote for him.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
12. Agree. You either compromise or allow the government to be shut down.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 09:44 AM
Sep 2015

Until we weaken the GOP much further, those are the only 2 options available.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Precision and concision. That's the game.[/center][/font][hr]

Bucky

(55,334 posts)
15. Right on. Until we can get more Dems to vote in off-year elections, we'll continue this seesaw gov't
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:30 AM
Sep 2015

frylock

(34,825 posts)
7. The difference between Sanders and Obama is that Bernie will at least make an effort..
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 12:41 AM
Sep 2015

Obama didn't have the votes for single payer, but he never even tried. But we all saw that he could utilize his bully pulpit for the things he really wants, like TPP. In short, fuck this guy.

Uncle Joe

(65,134 posts)
8. Apparently the author hasn't paid attention to Bernie's words.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 12:49 AM
Sep 2015


"Let me tell you right now what no other candidate will tell you. And that is, no one who is elected President of the United States can do it alone. No one in the White House will have the power to take on Wall Street alone, Corporate America alone, the billionaire class alone. The only way that change takes place, is when we develope that strong grass roots movement. Make that political revolution, stand together, and then we bring about change."

https://go.berniesanders.com/page/event/detail/july29organizingmeetingat7pmetpt/wrqj



Thanks for the thread, rusty quoin.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
11. Most of his die-hard supporters turned on Obama a long time ago, so, yeah, this writer is correct.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 09:38 AM
Sep 2015

If Bernie became president, one of two things would happen:
1) He would accomplish nothing.
2) He would compromise and end up with accomplishments similar to Obama's (although probably not as many), and then get thrown under the bus.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
19. No. We didn't.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 11:25 AM
Sep 2015

I would be considered an Obama die-hard. I voted for him in the primaries in 2008. I supported him over Clinton.

Do I think he could have done more? Sure. He should have started negotiations from the left and not the center.

Do I think he could do everything I wanted? No. He had the worst Congress in my lifetime for most of his presidency.

Am I allowed to criticize him and still like him? You're damn straight I can.

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
13. Oh good, it's been a while since we had a nice hippie punching
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 09:47 AM
Sep 2015

"You liberals suck ass. Now vote for the Democrat!"

Bucky

(55,334 posts)
14. a good deal of emotional projection going on there
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:25 AM
Sep 2015

I don't think the writer understands that democracy is about participating, not just voting and then silently obeying.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
17. The disaffection of a worried nation, agitated by a cynical and foolish press,
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:48 AM
Sep 2015

should not be attributed to one group of political followers. Besides, the numbers of those sympathetic to what Bernie wants to accomplish range far beyond those this person imagines to be "hardliners on the left."

This guy clearly does not realize, or want to admit, that we intend to continue what we started when we elected President Obama. And that "we" includes solid majorities of all Americans who voted in the last two presidential elections.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I don't agree with this w...