Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:09 PM
Bernie responds to Clinton attack via Jennifer Epstein Bloomberg Politics correspondent
And, as reported by Jennifer, he elaborates: Jennifer Epstein @jeneps 15m15 minutes ago
Sanders on pro-Clinton super PAC's attack on him: "It was the kind of onslaught I expected to see from the Koch Brothers or Sheldon Adelson" https://twitter.com/jeneps/with_replies
|
121 replies, 7738 views
 121 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Bernie responds to Clinton attack via Jennifer Epstein Bloomberg Politics correspondent (Original post) |
Luminous Animal | Sep 2015 | OP |
| Cali_Democrat | Sep 2015 | #1 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #3 | |
| Cali_Democrat | Sep 2015 | #14 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #20 | |
| Cali_Democrat | Sep 2015 | #21 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #22 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #28 | |
| daleanime | Sep 2015 | #41 | |
| roguevalley | Sep 2015 | #54 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #58 | |
| roguevalley | Sep 2015 | #60 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Sep 2015 | #120 | |
| Admiral Loinpresser | Sep 2015 | #119 | |
| 99Forever | Sep 2015 | #25 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #26 | |
| Cali_Democrat | Sep 2015 | #29 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #31 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #33 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #32 | |
| MissDeeds | Sep 2015 | #46 | |
| jeff47 | Sep 2015 | #38 | |
| passiveporcupine | Sep 2015 | #44 | |
| LondonReign2 | Sep 2015 | #69 | |
| Fred Sanders | Sep 2015 | #84 | |
| LondonReign2 | Sep 2015 | #88 | |
| DisgustipatedinCA | Sep 2015 | #87 | |
| virtualobserver | Sep 2015 | #34 | |
| tblue37 | Sep 2015 | #67 | |
| pocoloco | Sep 2015 | #73 | |
| LondonReign2 | Sep 2015 | #5 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #10 | |
| Android3.14 | Sep 2015 | #48 | |
| winter is coming | Sep 2015 | #51 | |
| Spitfire of ATJ | Sep 2015 | #68 | |
| Autumn | Sep 2015 | #2 | |
| Fred Sanders | Sep 2015 | #4 | |
| LondonReign2 | Sep 2015 | #6 | |
| Fred Sanders | Sep 2015 | #7 | |
| LondonReign2 | Sep 2015 | #8 | |
| Fred Sanders | Sep 2015 | #11 | |
| LondonReign2 | Sep 2015 | #17 | |
| Fred Sanders | Sep 2015 | #81 | |
| LondonReign2 | Sep 2015 | #86 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #27 | |
| Fred Sanders | Sep 2015 | #83 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #89 | |
| Fred Sanders | Sep 2015 | #98 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #100 | |
| Fred Sanders | Sep 2015 | #101 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #102 | |
| Fred Sanders | Sep 2015 | #103 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #104 | |
| Fred Sanders | Sep 2015 | #105 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #106 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #107 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #108 | |
| frylock | Sep 2015 | #112 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #114 | |
| frylock | Sep 2015 | #118 | |
| frylock | Sep 2015 | #116 | |
| Phlem | Sep 2015 | #85 | |
| bunnies | Sep 2015 | #52 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #53 | |
| bunnies | Sep 2015 | #57 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #59 | |
| bunnies | Sep 2015 | #63 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #64 | |
| demwing | Sep 2015 | #71 | |
| AlbertCat | Sep 2015 | #78 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #12 | |
| Luminous Animal | Sep 2015 | #9 | |
| Report1212 | Sep 2015 | #39 | |
| AlbertCat | Sep 2015 | #82 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #13 | |
| Hollingsworth | Sep 2015 | #15 | |
| 99Forever | Sep 2015 | #16 | |
| pocoloco | Sep 2015 | #76 | |
| askew | Sep 2015 | #18 | |
| Hollingsworth | Sep 2015 | #19 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #30 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #35 | |
| virtualobserver | Sep 2015 | #36 | |
| jeff47 | Sep 2015 | #40 | |
| LondonReign2 | Sep 2015 | #72 | |
| frylock | Sep 2015 | #113 | |
| WillyT | Sep 2015 | #23 | |
| Truprogressive85 | Sep 2015 | #24 | |
| beam me up scottie | Sep 2015 | #37 | |
| lark | Sep 2015 | #42 | |
| Cheese Sandwich | Sep 2015 | #43 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #50 | |
| MisterP | Sep 2015 | #55 | |
| Enthusiast | Sep 2015 | #45 | |
| bunnies | Sep 2015 | #47 | |
| left-of-center2012 | Sep 2015 | #56 | |
| bunnies | Sep 2015 | #61 | |
| imthevicar | Sep 2015 | #90 | |
| MissDeeds | Sep 2015 | #49 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #62 | |
| laureloak | Sep 2015 | #65 | |
| demwing | Sep 2015 | #70 | |
| Uncle Joe | Sep 2015 | #66 | |
| Avalux | Sep 2015 | #74 | |
| senz | Sep 2015 | #75 | |
| Tierra_y_Libertad | Sep 2015 | #77 | |
| restorefreedom | Sep 2015 | #111 | |
| dpatbrown | Sep 2015 | #79 | |
| Dont call me Shirley | Sep 2015 | #80 | |
| sabrina 1 | Sep 2015 | #91 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #92 | |
| sabrina 1 | Sep 2015 | #94 | |
| arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #95 | |
| FloridaBlues | Sep 2015 | #93 | |
| frylock | Sep 2015 | #115 | |
| morningfog | Sep 2015 | #121 | |
| d_legendary1 | Sep 2015 | #96 | |
| Fairgo | Sep 2015 | #97 | |
| sadoldgirl | Sep 2015 | #99 | |
| Babel_17 | Sep 2015 | #109 | |
| frylock | Sep 2015 | #110 | |
| portlander23 | Sep 2015 | #117 |
Response to morningfog (Reply #22)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:44 PM
28. "As president I will reform the finances of every campaign. After this one"
 |
Response to daleanime (Reply #41)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:23 PM
54. she has the responsibility to come out and firmly, unequivocably disavow them. The longer she
Response to arcane1 (Reply #58)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:26 PM
60. I agree. This is going to be about whatever it takes for her and it will in the offset only
Response to roguevalley (Reply #54)
Wed Sep 16, 2015, 12:48 AM
120. I thought Hillary wasn't going to attack Bernie
Response to morningfog (Reply #22)
Wed Sep 16, 2015, 12:46 AM
119. Not even Stephen Colbert used that loophole.
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #21)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:42 PM
25. The good ol' "plausible deniability" ruse, eh?
|
That ought you help with that trustworthiness rating.
|
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #29)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:56 PM
38. So they literally announce that they will be coordinating with this PAC
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #29)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:04 PM
44. do you think they would publish it?
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #29)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:45 PM
69. Nothing short of video evidence of the actual meeting with Hillary approving it will do!
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #29)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:33 PM
84. Who needs evidence when the world of speculation is wide open? SuperPac envy, maybe?
Response to Fred Sanders (Reply #84)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:38 PM
88. I'm convinced Cheney didn't out Valerie Plame either
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #21)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:50 PM
virtualobserver (8,760 posts)
34. so the coordinating Super PAC abruptly starts operating as a loose cannon
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #21)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:41 PM
tblue37 (58,319 posts)
67. She needs to come out loud and hard against such smears and demand the the group
Response to Android3.14 (Reply #48)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:14 PM
51. I wish Comedy Central would do a clip show of those segments.
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:16 PM
4. Superpacs speak for themselves....the headline is purposely misleading...of course.
Response to LondonReign2 (Reply #6)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:19 PM
7. Incorrect, again. See facts everywhere. See another opinion post that has Superpac in the headline.
Response to Fred Sanders (Reply #7)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:20 PM
8. It is a Super-PAC the Clinton campaign is coordinating with
Response to LondonReign2 (Reply #8)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:22 PM
11. She coordinates? Evidence needed. And what has Clinton actually said about attacking each other???
Response to LondonReign2 (Reply #17)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:30 PM
81. Evidence of THIS coordination....still zero. It is the OTHER party that needs no evidence, remember?
Response to morningfog (Reply #27)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:32 PM
83. An MSNBC video of yore is not evidence! On THIS allegation there is ZERO evidence, which is now
Response to morningfog (Reply #89)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:58 PM
98. For Sanders folks now resorting to "shit", I ditto the thinking.
Response to morningfog (Reply #100)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:05 PM
101. Where is the email? Why is the main piece missing? And where is the evidence countering the facts of the matter down thread?
Response to morningfog (Reply #102)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:16 PM
103. What I get is a lot of supporters have been fooled again into histrionics over another half-baked article.
Response to morningfog (Reply #104)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:21 PM
105. Please proceed....the whole article is being debunked....I get it. Frustrating.
Response to morningfog (Reply #106)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:26 PM
107. But it's being debunked!!1
|
Somewhere
 |
Response to Fred Sanders (Reply #105)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:56 PM
112. Debunked by whom? Correct the Record?
|
|
Response to morningfog (Reply #104)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 10:40 PM
118. Fred has flipped the script. Now we're attacking Brock..
Response to Fred Sanders (Reply #101)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 08:23 PM
116. You're in luck. Here's a video of Brock talking about the email right now..
Response to arcane1 (Reply #53)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:25 PM
57. Who in their right mind attacks someone for helping the poor?
|
Next they'll be saying that Hillary knew *nothing* about this. Bullshit. Same old same old.
 |
Response to arcane1 (Reply #59)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:32 PM
63. If it serves them. Apparently.
|
Glad Im not in that camp.
 |
Response to Fred Sanders (Reply #11)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:27 PM
78. She coordinates?
|
Maybe she doesn't coordinate with her own campaign. Could that be a possibility?
But I'm not gonna play the "I don't like what she hasn't said" game. That's what some groups were doing to Sanders a time ago. It's dumb. But if her campaign is coordinating AND she doesn't even know about it..... I don't think so.... |
Response to Fred Sanders (Reply #4)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:21 PM
9. "Correct the Record" the Super Pac in question has claimed, multiple times in many
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:27 PM
16. Another huge unforced error by Camp Weathervane.
|
That's gonna leave a mark.
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:30 PM
18. This was such a stupid attack against Bernie.
Response to arcane1 (Reply #30)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:52 PM
virtualobserver (8,760 posts)
36. She is trying to keep Dick Cheney from voting for Bernie
Response to arcane1 (Reply #30)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:58 PM
40. Sending out talking points. We'll see them in DU posts in the near future. (nt)
Response to askew (Reply #18)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:52 PM
72. What? You don't think trying to link Bernie to
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 01:42 PM
23. HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!!
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:01 PM
lark (22,225 posts)
42. Hillary or someone close to her needs to let the PACS know to lay off.
Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #43)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:23 PM
55. I HOPE he was just referring to the depiction that they were using
Response to bunnies (Reply #47)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:24 PM
left-of-center2012 (34,195 posts)
56. Let the poor freeze to death?
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:09 PM
49. Looks like Bernie anticipated this kind of crap
|
and is prepared to effectively deal with it.
Give 'em hell, Bernie!!!! |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:36 PM
65. If he is the nominee he WILL take the money.
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 02:39 PM
Uncle Joe (55,255 posts)
66. Kicked and recommended.
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:09 PM
74. Fantastic response Bernie.
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:13 PM
75. Look at it this way: Clinton attacks are toughening Bernie up for the GE
|
when he'll encounter even lower, more disgusting lies and verbal assaults.
So I suppose we can thank them! 
|
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:30 PM
80. No doubt the two secretly support her.
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:49 PM
91. Why don't they talk about issues? All they DO is try to find ways to attack
Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #91)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:53 PM
92. She will lose on the issues. Sanders and O'Malley both are light-years beyond on issues
|
That's why she keeps stealing their rhetoric
 |
Response to arcane1 (Reply #92)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:31 PM
94. Yes, but do they think people are not noticing this? The fact that we do have
|
two candidates now in the race who are light years ahead of her re Issues, and ARE discussing them, only highlights these nasty, dirty games designed NOT to talk about issues.
I can't think of a more losing tactic. The people are sick to death of these distractions, they want to talk about issues. So like I said, let her keep doing this, the more she does it, the more people will see that's all SHE is doing. And these attacks are so OLD. I mean at least move into the 21st Century. Red Baiting, seriously in today's world??? |
Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #94)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:34 PM
95. I think they seriously believed Sanders would be gone by now, a grumpy, dismissed racist
|
Thus holding off on the debates so the take-down could do its work. Now that we're getting close to debate time, and his numbers are looking so much better, they have to run an actual campaign against him, and do Whatever It Takes to do so.
Plus, he got some of those Liberty students to agree with some of his ideas, hence the right-wing techniques now. With all that money the Clinton campaign spent on polls, it seems they aren't liking the results |
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:02 PM
FloridaBlues (3,624 posts)
93. You don't have any proof HRC did this
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 04:37 PM
96. Why doesn't HRC just hire Karl Rove?
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:01 PM
99. Yes, his response was reasonable ,
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:48 PM
109. Spot on answer from Sanders
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:53 PM
110. It was the kind of onslaught I expected to see from Hillary Clinton.
