Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
  Post removed Fri Sep 18, 2015, 09:41 PM Sep 2015

Post removed

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post removed (Original Post) Post removed Sep 2015 OP
That "Great Society" sure did exclude lots of folks. SonderWoman Sep 2015 #1
The VRA provided more protection for minorities voting then jfern Sep 2015 #4
See post #6 leftofcool Sep 2015 #9
The Great Society didn't exclude minorities, though jfern Sep 2015 #11
I didn't say they were totally excluded. leftofcool Sep 2015 #15
I agree that I don't want to return to those horrible things, but the "Grest Society" was about JDPriestly Sep 2015 #30
Not a fucking chance in hell. leftofcool Sep 2015 #5
Really? artislife Sep 2015 #10
Hey, whatever floats your boat. leftofcool Sep 2015 #12
Back to the Clintons in the White House artislife Sep 2015 #18
My group of Bernie volunteers is mostly women. JDPriestly Sep 2015 #31
And find me one woman or minority that lived in the 50s or 60s zeemike Sep 2015 #38
The 1964 Civil Rights Act outlawed discrimination on the basis of gender dflprincess Sep 2015 #39
Barely enough charisma to be Gallup's most admired woman 6chars Sep 2015 #2
Plus, I have met her and she is an incredibly warm and kind woman. Walk away Sep 2015 #24
Wow! 6chars Sep 2015 #25
RR=Ron Reagan Jr. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #26
Shedid not do well in the debates in 2008. I suggest everyone watch those videos JDPriestly Sep 2015 #33
Are Rose-Coloured glasses expensive? Thespian2 Sep 2015 #35
Well, to be honest, Bachman always confused the heck out of me too! 1monster Sep 2015 #36
Bachman? Nothingcleverjustray Sep 2015 #41
No thanks to the so called "Great Society" leftofcool Sep 2015 #3
The 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act both passed during dflprincess Sep 2015 #40
The New deal...hooo-boy Chitown Kev Sep 2015 #6
Do you ever wonder if people really understand the implications of their posts? leftofcool Sep 2015 #8
Come on jfern Sep 2015 #14
Not even close to the same thing. leftofcool Sep 2015 #16
Oh come on! You talk as though the New Deal the the Great Society were 1monster Sep 2015 #34
You can thanK Obama for moving the party to the right. Buzz cook Sep 2015 #7
Clinton is significantly to the right of Obama on foreign policy starroute Sep 2015 #43
Thank heaven that Hillary is still the front-runner ... NanceGreggs Sep 2015 #13
True this! leftofcool Sep 2015 #17
I've discovered ... NanceGreggs Sep 2015 #20
It isn't the DU-bashing that's going to change that. frylock Sep 2015 #28
Re: the OP anamnua Sep 2015 #19
She is a terrible "retail" politician. Indepatriot Sep 2015 #21
Who is the great "retail politician" she will be facing in the G E? DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #23
I'm hoping we nominate a candidate who has more to offer than "I don't suck as bad as the GOP clown. Indepatriot Sep 2015 #27
I thought we were discussing political skills , colloquially known as charm./nt DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #29
Your reply suggested she wasn't " as bad a retail politician" as the Lunatics of the GOP. Indepatriot Sep 2015 #42
Bill Clinton...sociopath?? rusty quoin Sep 2015 #22
Some people come here because they murielm99 Sep 2015 #37
Hillary is a bit wooden. jalan48 Sep 2015 #32
LBJ & FDR Were Pretty Problematic for Minorities lib87 Sep 2015 #44
 

SonderWoman

(1,169 posts)
1. That "Great Society" sure did exclude lots of folks.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 09:47 PM
Sep 2015

Find me one woman or minority that wants to return to those days.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
4. The VRA provided more protection for minorities voting then
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 09:52 PM
Sep 2015

than now that the Supreme Court gutted it.

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
15. I didn't say they were totally excluded.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:00 PM
Sep 2015

But, I think I don't want to go back to the days of lynchings, backroom abortions, no rights for women and I am about 99.9% sure you won't find a minority what would want to either.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
30. I agree that I don't want to return to those horrible things, but the "Grest Society" was about
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:18 PM
Sep 2015

Helping the poor and Medicare.

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
5. Not a fucking chance in hell.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 09:52 PM
Sep 2015

If this is the way Bernie feels, there ain't a woman in this country that would vote for him. Can you imagine a president who wants to return to the days of the "Great Society?"

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
10. Really?
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 09:56 PM
Sep 2015

This reminds me of a soccer player flaying about the pitch after being tapped.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
18. Back to the Clintons in the White House
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:05 PM
Sep 2015

Hello DADT!

No Marriage Equality!

Extra marital sex in the Oval Office!

No cookies baking!


Wah wah...

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
38. And find me one woman or minority that lived in the 50s or 60s
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:44 PM
Sep 2015

That does not think that things got significantly better.
I know because I lived in those times.

In 1968 I went to work in a manufacturing plant in a county that was 40% black and of the 700 people who worked there not one of them was black...except for the janitors who cleaned the office space...and not one woman except for the secretaries.
That all changed in the early 70s due to the great society and the civil right act.

dflprincess

(29,346 posts)
39. The 1964 Civil Rights Act outlawed discrimination on the basis of gender
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:46 PM
Sep 2015

sure, it was tossed in by a bigot who thought it would weaken the bill. But it didn't and the Democrats and moderate Republicans passed it and LBJ signed it.

Progress was made.

6chars

(3,967 posts)
2. Barely enough charisma to be Gallup's most admired woman
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 09:48 PM
Sep 2015

In
1993
1994
1997
1998
1999
2000
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
(2015 poll not out yet)

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
24. Plus, I have met her and she is an incredibly warm and kind woman.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:45 PM
Sep 2015

I have seen the tapes of Bernie debating Bachman. He just looks confused. This time he will be debating a brilliant woman who can speak to every issue and not just the same one over and over again.

6chars

(3,967 posts)
25. Wow!
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:50 PM
Sep 2015

Was it a handshake type thing or did you have a chance to talk with her? Was she just like she seems on tv?

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
26. RR=Ron Reagan Jr.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:53 PM
Sep 2015

ER: Do you think Hillary’s got any charisma?
RR: She’s not without charisma. I’ve been in a room with her a couple of times. She’s bright and charming one-on-one, funny. She’s got charisma, she does. It’s not high wattage kind of charisma like her husband or my father, or Obama for that matter. But it’s there.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/09/reagan-sons-interview-donald-trump-213149#ixzz3m9JZMTxb

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
33. Shedid not do well in the debates in 2008. I suggest everyone watch those videos
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:23 PM
Sep 2015

Especially the one about raising the cap on Social Security.

1monster

(11,045 posts)
36. Well, to be honest, Bachman always confused the heck out of me too!
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:32 PM
Sep 2015

She isn't very coherent and when she is, ... Come to think of it, I can't think of a time when I heard her say anything that made sense at all.

 
41. Bachman?
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:50 PM
Sep 2015

That wasn't a debate, that was Bachman screeching at Bernie like a fucking idiot. She wouldn't shut up. During a debate there are time limits. I watched it as well, she pummelled Bernie with her super stupidity powers. Or, is that how Hilary's gonna roll as well?

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
3. No thanks to the so called "Great Society"
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 09:50 PM
Sep 2015

No rights for women, no civil rights, backroom abortions. Not only no, but hell no!

dflprincess

(29,346 posts)
40. The 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act both passed during
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:49 PM
Sep 2015

LBJ's "Great Society".

Chitown Kev

(2,197 posts)
6. The New deal...hooo-boy
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 09:53 PM
Sep 2015

still looking for that anti-lynching legislation from President Roosevelt.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
14. Come on
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 09:59 PM
Sep 2015

Does the fact that most states didn't have SSM at the time mean that no can long for the days of 2009 when Democrats had solid control of Congress and Obama was popular?

1monster

(11,045 posts)
34. Oh come on! You talk as though the New Deal the the Great Society were
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:26 PM
Sep 2015

responsible for the racism and sexism of those eras. The Great Society was working to do away with some of the inequities of the time. If women's rights were not at the top of the list, the advancements that have been made were in part made somewhat possible by those programs.

I wasn't alive for the New Deal, but I do remember the Great Society... It was working to better everyone's lives and part of the Great Society WAS voting rights. Women's rights as a movement only began to pick up steam during this time.

I remember, as a child, being told that my career choices were, preferably: Wife and mother; less preferably: teacher, nurse, secretary, or nun. If I was unfortunate, I could, if my family was in a bad way, also be a waitress or a cashier. That was the early sixties. By the end of the sixties, it was a whole different story.

We made great strides forward since then, but even now we are fighting the same battles. For every step forward we have made, there has been a strident, screaming backlash that has tried very hard to take us back. Racism and sexism hide under their rocks for a while until we think they are in their death throes and we relax. Then, like the venomous snakes they are, they raise their heads and strike again. And we have to battle them all over again.

And Bernie has been fighting right along side of us to defeat racism, sexism, and inequities for fifty years. Any implication that he is fighting against us is simply not true.

Buzz cook

(2,899 posts)
7. You can thanK Obama for moving the party to the right.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 09:53 PM
Sep 2015

After Obama Clinton can't help but move the party leftward.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
43. Clinton is significantly to the right of Obama on foreign policy
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 12:18 AM
Sep 2015

And possibly to his right on corporate and environmental issues -- though she's being coy about where she stands on those.

NanceGreggs

(27,835 posts)
13. Thank heaven that Hillary is still the front-runner ...
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 09:59 PM
Sep 2015

... and all the DU-bashing in the world isn't going to change that.

NanceGreggs

(27,835 posts)
20. I've discovered ...
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:10 PM
Sep 2015

... that if you don't bother looking at the polls, BS is doing extremely well - in some netherworld where voters don't actually matter.

anamnua

(1,510 posts)
19. Re: the OP
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:06 PM
Sep 2015

As a Hillary advocate in DU during the dark days of 2008 when the obloquy towards her bordered on the hysterical certain avatars are indelibly imprinted on my memory; that ofthe OPer is one of them.

 

Indepatriot

(1,253 posts)
21. She is a terrible "retail" politician.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:16 PM
Sep 2015

That's why a truly believe she'd lose the G.E. That, and non-stop ads of her getting caught lying about sniper fire in Bosnia, then doubling-down on the lie when called on it.

 

Indepatriot

(1,253 posts)
27. I'm hoping we nominate a candidate who has more to offer than "I don't suck as bad as the GOP clown.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:53 PM
Sep 2015
 

Indepatriot

(1,253 posts)
42. Your reply suggested she wasn't " as bad a retail politician" as the Lunatics of the GOP.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:59 PM
Sep 2015

While that is probably true, I don't think she can win. Americans are not known for their politically astute judgements..... A Koch Brothers funded, non-stop loop of her "Tall Tales of Tuzla" incident will further erode her trustworthiness making her shaky campaign flounder more than it already has. Hello Bush III...

murielm99

(32,988 posts)
37. Some people come here because they
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:39 PM
Sep 2015

genuinely support Bernie. Others simply because they are Clinton haters.

jalan48

(14,914 posts)
32. Hillary is a bit wooden.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:22 PM
Sep 2015

I'm sure that is one reason Debbie Downer is limiting the debates, she's trying to limit the damage. I think once Hillary starts taking positions on key issues she may do better though.

lib87

(535 posts)
44. LBJ & FDR Were Pretty Problematic for Minorities
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 12:22 AM
Sep 2015

Referring to minorities as slurs, not including groups in SSA benefits, internment camps/kicking Japanese out their homes...I want no parts of the New Deal/Great Society past.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Post removed