2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSonderWoman
(1,169 posts)Find me one woman or minority that wants to return to those days.
jfern
(5,204 posts)than now that the Supreme Court gutted it.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)But, I think I don't want to go back to the days of lynchings, backroom abortions, no rights for women and I am about 99.9% sure you won't find a minority what would want to either.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Helping the poor and Medicare.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)If this is the way Bernie feels, there ain't a woman in this country that would vote for him. Can you imagine a president who wants to return to the days of the "Great Society?"
artislife
(9,497 posts)This reminds me of a soccer player flaying about the pitch after being tapped.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Hello DADT!
No Marriage Equality!
Extra marital sex in the Oval Office!
No cookies baking!
Wah wah...
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)That does not think that things got significantly better.
I know because I lived in those times.
In 1968 I went to work in a manufacturing plant in a county that was 40% black and of the 700 people who worked there not one of them was black...except for the janitors who cleaned the office space...and not one woman except for the secretaries.
That all changed in the early 70s due to the great society and the civil right act.
dflprincess
(29,346 posts)sure, it was tossed in by a bigot who thought it would weaken the bill. But it didn't and the Democrats and moderate Republicans passed it and LBJ signed it.
Progress was made.
6chars
(3,967 posts)In
1993
1994
1997
1998
1999
2000
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
(2015 poll not out yet)
Walk away
(9,494 posts)I have seen the tapes of Bernie debating Bachman. He just looks confused. This time he will be debating a brilliant woman who can speak to every issue and not just the same one over and over again.
Was it a handshake type thing or did you have a chance to talk with her? Was she just like she seems on tv?
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,853 posts)ER: Do you think Hillarys got any charisma?
RR: Shes not without charisma. Ive been in a room with her a couple of times. Shes bright and charming one-on-one, funny. Shes got charisma, she does. Its not high wattage kind of charisma like her husband or my father, or Obama for that matter. But its there.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/09/reagan-sons-interview-donald-trump-213149#ixzz3m9JZMTxb
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Especially the one about raising the cap on Social Security.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)1monster
(11,045 posts)She isn't very coherent and when she is, ... Come to think of it, I can't think of a time when I heard her say anything that made sense at all.
Nothingcleverjustray
(37 posts)That wasn't a debate, that was Bachman screeching at Bernie like a fucking idiot. She wouldn't shut up. During a debate there are time limits. I watched it as well, she pummelled Bernie with her super stupidity powers. Or, is that how Hilary's gonna roll as well?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)No rights for women, no civil rights, backroom abortions. Not only no, but hell no!
dflprincess
(29,346 posts)LBJ's "Great Society".
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)still looking for that anti-lynching legislation from President Roosevelt.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Does the fact that most states didn't have SSM at the time mean that no can long for the days of 2009 when Democrats had solid control of Congress and Obama was popular?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)1monster
(11,045 posts)responsible for the racism and sexism of those eras. The Great Society was working to do away with some of the inequities of the time. If women's rights were not at the top of the list, the advancements that have been made were in part made somewhat possible by those programs.
I wasn't alive for the New Deal, but I do remember the Great Society... It was working to better everyone's lives and part of the Great Society WAS voting rights. Women's rights as a movement only began to pick up steam during this time.
I remember, as a child, being told that my career choices were, preferably: Wife and mother; less preferably: teacher, nurse, secretary, or nun. If I was unfortunate, I could, if my family was in a bad way, also be a waitress or a cashier. That was the early sixties. By the end of the sixties, it was a whole different story.
We made great strides forward since then, but even now we are fighting the same battles. For every step forward we have made, there has been a strident, screaming backlash that has tried very hard to take us back. Racism and sexism hide under their rocks for a while until we think they are in their death throes and we relax. Then, like the venomous snakes they are, they raise their heads and strike again. And we have to battle them all over again.
And Bernie has been fighting right along side of us to defeat racism, sexism, and inequities for fifty years. Any implication that he is fighting against us is simply not true.
Buzz cook
(2,899 posts)After Obama Clinton can't help but move the party leftward.
starroute
(12,977 posts)And possibly to his right on corporate and environmental issues -- though she's being coy about where she stands on those.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... and all the DU-bashing in the world isn't going to change that.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... that if you don't bother looking at the polls, BS is doing extremely well - in some netherworld where voters don't actually matter.
frylock
(34,825 posts)anamnua
(1,510 posts)As a Hillary advocate in DU during the dark days of 2008 when the obloquy towards her bordered on the hysterical certain avatars are indelibly imprinted on my memory; that ofthe OPer is one of them.
Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)That's why a truly believe she'd lose the G.E. That, and non-stop ads of her getting caught lying about sniper fire in Bosnia, then doubling-down on the lie when called on it.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,853 posts)Everything is relative.
Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,853 posts)Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)While that is probably true, I don't think she can win. Americans are not known for their politically astute judgements..... A Koch Brothers funded, non-stop loop of her "Tall Tales of Tuzla" incident will further erode her trustworthiness making her shaky campaign flounder more than it already has. Hello Bush III...
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)murielm99
(32,988 posts)genuinely support Bernie. Others simply because they are Clinton haters.
jalan48
(14,914 posts)I'm sure that is one reason Debbie Downer is limiting the debates, she's trying to limit the damage. I think once Hillary starts taking positions on key issues she may do better though.
lib87
(535 posts)Referring to minorities as slurs, not including groups in SSA benefits, internment camps/kicking Japanese out their homes...I want no parts of the New Deal/Great Society past.