Dog Whistles- an Anti-Semitism Primer (a timely repost)
Last edited Sat Sep 26, 2015, 01:20 PM - Edit history (1)
There are really four classic anti-Semitic themes that have been for centuries to justify mass murder, mass expulsion, or both. They are that Jews have control the world's media, that Jews have an international conspiracy to control the world's money, that Jews join national governments and undermine them from within for their own purposes, and the "blood libel," a claim that Jews use the blood of Gentiles, usually children, to bake their Passover matzoh. Below I will try to define each of them, discuss their history, and explain why they remain important to this very day.
BLOOD LIBEL
Let me start with the last, the "blood libel." There are a couple of different forms of the blood libel. One is that Jews drink Christian or Muslim blood outright, and the other is that Jews use Christian or Muslim blood in matzoh. This is a slander with a long and inglorious history. The first iteration was the the story of William of Norwich, recorded in the Peterborough Chronicle. This story from 1144 alleged that a boy, William of Norwich, was kidnapped by Jews, tied to a cross, stabbed in the head to stimulate Jesus' crown of thorns, and killed. His blood was drunk and used in matzoh. This story was a rumor and the Jews were vindicated by five different Popes, but the legend lived on. But it was more than a legend. It was an excuse for slaughter and mayhem.
...
Jewish Disloyalty
The most famous example of this theme is the German post-WWI theme of the "stab in the back."
The Stab in the Back myth claimed that the German Army was victorious along the battle lines, but suffered a "stab in the back" from disloyal Jews. I hope I need not go into any detail as to where this led.
At the same time Hitler was exercising his Final Solution, Jews were being sent to Siberia by the Soviets. Jewish disloyalty has been a common theme throughout Russian history, and led to the pogroms of the late 19th century.
...
Jewish Bankers
This one flows from history, and can be seen throughout history. The "Jewish money-lender" is the central figure in The Merchant of Venice, and actually has some historic validity. You see, usury was considered unChristian (remember Jesus and the money-lenders) and was therefore illegal for Christians. That put people trying to pay for wars or put in new crops (which would not generate cash until the harvest was in) in a difficult position, as nobody was willing to lend money without interest. From this came a fairly common theme- Kings and nobles borrowed money from Jews, paid the interest as long as they thought they needed access to more money, then took all the Jews' property, prosecuted them for usery, or expelled them from the country. Another variation was simply declaring the Jews themselves property of the State.
...
Jew control the media
This one seems to come directly from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. It was enhanced and reprinted by Ford in "The International Jew." Father Charles Coughlin used his enormous radio following to perpetrate these lies.
Claims that Jews run the media are common today. That alone might be a generalization based upon ownership and participation at a rate higher than the percentage of Jewish population. But "Jews control the media" is only the first half of the claim. The other half is "... and they use that control for their own evil ends."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/01/01/678869/-Dog-Whistles-an-Anti-Semitism-Primer-a-timely-repost
Can we please stop pretending that accusing Bernie Sanders of dual loyalty isn't anti-Semitic?
Diane Rehm made this mistake when she interviewed Bernie for NPR and later apologized for it.
Abe Foxman of ADL has this to say:
“Diane Rehm’s questions were inappropriate, insensitive questioning without any minimal journalistic checking of claims. Such a statement is not only factually incorrect, but has no place in such an interview.
It is deeply troubling to think that a well-respected media outlet like NPR would apparently rely on unsubstantiated information from the Internet in its preparation for a guest.
“Ms. Rehm’s description and follow-up question about whether other Senators have dual citizenship with Israel play into classic anti-Semitic charges of dual loyalty. Such charges have been leveled for centuries and have been a catalyst for scapegoating and vilifying Jews.
Senator Sanders deserves a public apology, as do NPR listeners.”
...
Her mistake was to not research it before she even stated it as fact. She shouldn’t have asked the question, period. Had she researched it, she wouldn’t have raised it at all. Because her question challenges not only his loyalty, but also Jewish loyalties to this country.”
= new reply since forum marked as read
[URL=
.html][IMG]
[/IMG][/URL]
By their works ye shall know them.
[URL=
.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
i don't think either has gotten more than one percent though.
at least we have
The list she referred to was from a white supremacist on facebook.
Some DUers were even asking why lists of Jews were so offensive.
This is currently the most common anti-Semitic trope in the Western World, IMO. All other slurs ("stabbing in the back", control of the media, the government) all seem to circle back to "Jews are more loyal to Israel." Prior to the creation of Israel, it was still a popular attack; in the US and other Western nations, Jews were "communists, Bolsheviks, socialists", but in places like Russia, and similar countries, Jews were "capitalists, purveyors of Western propaganda, etc.". It takes on many forms, including tripe like "D-Tel Aviv" behind the names of Jewish politicians who don't vote "the right way"; Jews are responsible for anti-Semitism (usually in the form of blaming Israel/Israeli leaders/random robber barons) in order to gain sympathy for themselves and Israel; and Jews "take advantage of" the Holocaust to further their stronghold on Western countries. Many people ignore anti-Semitism because it doesn't come in the form of epithets or spraying swastikas on things (hell, even that often meets with "but...but...but...won't somebody please think of the history of the swastika!"
. They also ignore it because they are ignorant of it and any information they do have is often quite limited.
And I think you're absolutely right, we'll have to do this again and again as the primaries progress.
Well done, I think Obama would approve!
As you have pointed out here with the Rehm interview.
Thanks, BMUS.
There are a lot of people who should be making their arguments in this thread but aren't here.
I guess it must be invisible.
My eternal gratitude for posting an educational and enlightening piece.
My heart always goes out to the people whom have suffered injustice because of these lies.
Damnation on those liars.
I cannot tolerate bigotry of any kind and religious bigotry is all too easy to excuse because it's based on long accepted beliefs.
There was a poll in GD a few months ago where people actually argued that those who advocate against marriage equality are not bigoted.
