2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe enemy of my enemy is my friend
By using repub scandals to support your candidate makes the repubs your friends.
Why do dirty work when they will do it for you.
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Post removed
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)I wonder just who or where some of the posters come from.
oasis
(49,381 posts)The Dem ticket in 2016, no matter who was on it.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... at this point, probably more than that.
The same posters who have talked trash about the Dem Party since joining are still doing it. The same people who posted nothing but anti-Obama posts now post nothing but anti-HRC posts.
There are people here who have never posted anything positive about any Democrat.
Funny how you always see DUers saying, "If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck ...," but supposedly never see the ducks among them.
And now DU is full of alleged BS supporters - who use that alleged supporter status to trash Hillary (and every Dem who supports her) as cover for doing so on a "Democratic" board.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)amirite?
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... of cult behaviour is immediately embracing someone who you believe is on your side solely because they profess to have an enemy in common with you.
A lot of RW trolls were accepted as True Progressives (TM) here simply because they posted the same anti-Obama screeds that the progressier-than-thous posted. "You cant stand Obama, too? You must be one of us!"
Remember BetterBelieveIt? He posted anti-Obama/anti-Dem bullshit for over three years and 18,000 posts - and was declared a "true progressive voice" by the PTTs - until he let his guard down and was outed as what he'd been all along: a RW troll.
Pretending to be a BS supporter here provides great cover for bashing the front-runner, any Dem who supports her, and the Party as a whole, while maintaining one's board cred as a "Democrat".
Andy823
(11,495 posts)oasis
(49,381 posts)brooklynite
(94,520 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)I think I just hurt my jaw.
Is there anything else that they are making sense about? Or is that an isolated item?
Autumn
(45,066 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Autumn
(45,066 posts)So I don't consider any discussion over that to be RW propaganda. I'm positive she did nothing wrong but she made that an issue, no one else .
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)EGazhi = BGazhi.
Brought to by the same folks.
And some new ones lately.
Autumn
(45,066 posts)If you have issues with Democrats discussing it, take it up with Hillary.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027209985
It was my choice, Clinton said. It was a mistake back when I did it, and Im trying to do the best I can to answer all of the questions that people have.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Supporting RW zilch at DU used to be avoided, not cheered.
And now that the Howdy Gowdy Get Clinton Kanagaroo Court is in session, who will be cheering for that bit of sophistry to again try to take down the overwhelming favorite to win the WH for a single party for an unprecedented 3rd straight term?
Bengazhi, Phase 2.
Who will cheer?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Benghazi has never been anything but RWNJ bullshit.
I have never mentioned either in my strong criticisms of Clinton. There are plenty of real issues on which she is a complete failure and I stick to those.
Autumn
(45,066 posts)I think it shows a problem with her judgment, she knows just what the republicans do and how they do it. She gave them a gift to go after her with. She knew better and she did it anyway.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)not a huge one, but it does reflect badly on her judgment.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)If your candidate can't stand up to the truth, how will she/he stand up to the lies that the GOP slime machine will roll out for the General Election?
If your candidate is so weak that the truth hurts, then maybe you should consider a different candidate.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)oasis
(49,381 posts)They have no problem holding Hillary to a standard they blatantly ignore.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Absolutely nothing new about it and we all know about it. The only difference between the right wing media and many of the posts here? The right wing media offers page six retractions. There are no retractions here for the dishonesty.
There is zero difference in promoting the email thing and promoting Gowdy. Those promoting it are his supporters. No difference.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)I don't know why on this earth anybody would defend that.
It's not a republican scandal. It's just a case that shows the arrogance of power and how some people think they don't have to follow the rules.
It could have caused a serious problem. Also they keep changing the story making like they are trying to cover it up.
Snap the Turtle
(73 posts)Seems like someone is speaking in tongues....
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=teal]Though in seriousness, I don't support using bull scandals to support my candidate. I just like focusing on the issues.
I also don't believe in using false dichotomy fallacies either.
Peace.
Edit: Beside, the other democratic candidates are not my candidate's enemies, but rather rivals.[/font]
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)/thread
Darb
(2,807 posts)I like Bernie, but come on Bernie's people, quit taking cues from the Baggers. WTF?
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Hillary supporters are now "friends"
with the right-wingers in their
hate for Bernie and his minions?
brooklynite
(94,520 posts)...because finding someone who hates Hillary Clinton would be very easy.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Nobody here hates Bernie, it's some of the phony self proclaimed Bernie supporters that people don't like, and they are pretty easy to spot if one really wants to see them.