Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New national poll (sept. 24-27): Clinton 44%, Sanders 23%, Biden 19%. (Original Post) twii Sep 2015 OP
Still ahead by double digits, still the next President. leftofcool Sep 2015 #1
Awesome...Go Hillary! workinclasszero Sep 2015 #52
Good news! wolfie001 Sep 2015 #2
I bet this one won't make headlines. Metric System Sep 2015 #3
MSM at it again Robbins Sep 2015 #4
This poll is in line with every other poll from the past two months, except the one outlier Godhumor Sep 2015 #5
Now, Morning Consult is including Biden. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #6
Always like to see these types of poll numbers FloridaBlues Sep 2015 #7
What the hell is morningconsult.com? Honeylies Sep 2015 #8
If I felt as strongly as you I would find their office and... DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #9
Yikes Honeylies Sep 2015 #10
Shouldn't we all be vigilant re deceptive practices and willing to shine a light on them? DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #11
Yes! Which is why I questioned their methodology Honeylies Sep 2015 #14
More efficacious DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #16
A permanent solution to a temporary problem Honeylies Sep 2015 #20
You almost got me there... DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #21
Or may I suggest a "Third Way" Honeylies Sep 2015 #23
Actually, the poll is in line with the trend DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #24
See post #12 Honeylies Sep 2015 #26
Conveniently ignoring the posts responding to post 12, I see Godhumor Sep 2015 #29
Doesn't change the fact Honeylies Sep 2015 #44
I can't believe you posted that. Not sure if advocating suicide is against TOS Live and Learn Sep 2015 #42
Self sacrifice has a long and storied tradition as does irony. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #45
I never thought Honeylies Sep 2015 #48
GIFTED with the preternatural ability to feel what others feel MoveIt Sep 2015 #46
My feelings are hurt. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #47
Please read my post #12, and don't worry about this poll Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #13
RCP doesn't include internet polls Godhumor Sep 2015 #17
Pollster aggregate 22 hours ago had Clinton 43%, Sanders 28%. However, Hortensis Sep 2015 #22
Morning Consult is almost always an outlier in Hillary's favor. Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #12
They're higher because, until this one, they didn't include Biden Godhumor Sep 2015 #15
Poll trutherism at its finest. DanTex Sep 2015 #18
Again, 9/11-9/13 did not include Biden Godhumor Sep 2015 #31
Picking up steam, rolling towards Super Tuesday, and beyond. oasis Sep 2015 #19
More variation. HerbChestnut Sep 2015 #25
Let's look at those three Godhumor Sep 2015 #27
Not really. HerbChestnut Sep 2015 #35
It is very well established Bernie is in the mid20s and has been for two months Godhumor Sep 2015 #40
Well then we're clearly seeing two different things. HerbChestnut Sep 2015 #43
We haven't had our first debate yet. I'm looking forward to the start of our primary season. nt stillwaiting Sep 2015 #38
Actually, two DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #30
That link proves my point... HerbChestnut Sep 2015 #33
I am not disputing there has been movement. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #34
Probably not. HerbChestnut Sep 2015 #39
The overall average for the time period shown in that graph is 46 Clinton 25 Sanders Godhumor Sep 2015 #36
Exactly, good. Now you're looking at averages. HerbChestnut Sep 2015 #41
So Clinton 44 vs 42 who prefer either a Socialist or someone who's not running? snot Sep 2015 #28
When was the last time a sitting vice president, candidacy announced or not, ... DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #32
Or...Sanders vs. 63% wo pick either someone you think is dishonest and a non candidate twii Sep 2015 #37
Found their methodology. Note that their polls are "sponsored," but haven't found yet who sponsored magical thyme Sep 2015 #49
FWIW Pollster would likely prefer to see Hillary vs Bernie in office Honeylies Sep 2015 #50
Go Hillary! BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #51

wolfie001

(7,667 posts)
2. Good news!
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 06:46 AM
Sep 2015

It's a shame how many people here at DU have been sucked into the, and I quote: "VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY". The repukes are more fetid then 1994, or whenever the next President said that.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
4. MSM at it again
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 08:36 AM
Sep 2015

whenever a poll has good news for bernie they manufacture another one saying Hilary has no problems

Guess which one will get more play today

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
5. This poll is in line with every other poll from the past two months, except the one outlier
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 08:43 AM
Sep 2015

And the outlier grabbed all the attention.

Honeylies

(77 posts)
8. What the hell is morningconsult.com?
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:05 AM
Sep 2015

Some rinky dinky shoddy polling site? I had to dig for methodology. I couldnt find anything specific to this poll. I dont recall seeing them on realclearpolitics. Who paid for this thing?

How is the NBC/WSJ an outlier when Clinton has been steadily loosing ground and Bernie has been steadily building momentum? It's in line.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html#polls

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
9. If I felt as strongly as you I would find their office and...
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:08 AM
Sep 2015
What the hell is morningconsult.com?

Some rinky dinky shoddy polling site? I had to dig for methodology. I couldnt find anything specific to this poll. I dont recall seeing them on realclearpolitics. Who paid for this thing?




If I felt as strongly as you I would find their office and immolate myself in front of it to shine a light on their shoddy practices.


DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
11. Shouldn't we all be vigilant re deceptive practices and willing to shine a light on them?
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:16 AM
Sep 2015

eom

Honeylies

(77 posts)
14. Yes! Which is why I questioned their methodology
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:17 AM
Sep 2015

In a public forum. No need to light oneself on fire. But you go right ahead. You be you.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
16. More efficacious
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:23 AM
Sep 2015

More efficacious:

-Criticizing what you see as Morning Consult's "shoddy" polling practice on an anonymous bulletin board.

or


-Immolating yourself in front of their office to draw attention to what you see as their "shoddy" polling practices.





Honeylies

(77 posts)
20. A permanent solution to a temporary problem
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:39 AM
Sep 2015

I recommend you seek help with your reasoning skills.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
21. You almost got me there...
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:44 AM
Sep 2015
A permanent solution to a temporary problem
I recommend you seek help with your reasoning skills



You almost got me there. A hunger strike would be more suitable because then you would be alive to conduct a hunger strike to protest the next "shoddy" poll you found wanting.

Honeylies

(77 posts)
23. Or may I suggest a "Third Way"
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:05 AM
Sep 2015

In honor of our Third Way candidate.

We just wait for a few more polls to come out to confirm the trend?

Honeylies

(77 posts)
26. See post #12
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:24 AM
Sep 2015

Morning consult is not in line for Sanders on this poll and the tend to be Hillary-friendly over time. If they happened to be Bernie or Biden friendly most of the time and had sketchy methodology, I would still question them. I wouldn't douse myself in lighter fluid or anything, but I'd post about it here.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
29. Conveniently ignoring the posts responding to post 12, I see
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:40 AM
Sep 2015

Until this poll, Biden was not included. Clinton has been right around ten points better in every poll without Biden. This poll included Biden and Clinton is in line with all other polls that include him with her 43% support.

NBC is the outlier; not this one.

Honeylies

(77 posts)
44. Doesn't change the fact
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:35 AM
Sep 2015

That the morning consult poll uses sh!t methodology. NBC/WSJ is a solid poll. The morning consult poll is SHODDY so I'm gonna go ahead and not worry about it, but if Hillaryphiles want to cling to it as a beacon of hope, that's their choice. Time will tell if the latest NBC/WSJ is an outlier or not, but it appears to be a continuation of a trend.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/interactives/pollster-ratings/

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
42. I can't believe you posted that. Not sure if advocating suicide is against TOS
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:14 AM
Sep 2015

but it should be.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
45. Self sacrifice has a long and storied tradition as does irony.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:36 AM
Sep 2015

Self sacrifice has a long and storied tradition as does irony, think Christ on the Cross, Socrates drinking the hemlock, Joan Of Arc being burned at the stake. Thankfully my interlocutor has a sense of the latter as well as the former.

I would also note that I wrote what I would do in that situation.

Live and learn, amigo or amiga.




Honeylies

(77 posts)
48. I never thought
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:47 AM
Sep 2015

Questioning a poll would have led to someone immediately suggesting I light myself on fire. I certainly underestimated the repressive nature of some of the individuals on this forum!

 

MoveIt

(399 posts)
46. GIFTED with the preternatural ability to feel what others feel
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:42 AM
Sep 2015

And yet all your posts seem to be without a single speck of empathy.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
47. My feelings are hurt.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:46 AM
Sep 2015
GIFTED with the preternatural ability to feel what others feel. And yet all your posts seem to be without a single speck of empathy.


My feelings are now hurt. Consistency can be a demanding lover.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
17. RCP doesn't include internet polls
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:24 AM
Sep 2015

And NBC/WSJ is an outlier. Fox shows Bernie at 30, but he was also 30 in the Fox poll a month ago (zero movement). Otherwise, Bernie has averaged 23 to 27 points across the board whether Biden is included or not.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
22. Pollster aggregate 22 hours ago had Clinton 43%, Sanders 28%. However,
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:53 AM
Sep 2015

as of today FiveThirtyEight counts endorsements as
HRC 341
Biden 16
Sanders, O'Malley, Chafee, and Webb are all apparently 0.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
12. Morning Consult is almost always an outlier in Hillary's favor.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:16 AM
Sep 2015

Go to this link please: http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-national-democratic-primary#!mindate=2015-05-01&estimate=custom


Then use your cursor to hover over those little purple dots well above the median line. You will see that Morning Consult has now had 5 polls in a row well outside the median in Hillary's favor (including this one which is not on the chart as of this posting). Nearly half of those dots above the line in the last month are from them. They are skewing the average in her favor.


I don't know if their methodology is flawed or if they are just in the tank for her, but the pattern is very clear.

You can put your hopes here if you want, but you may be in for a big disappointment fairly soon.





edit to add: They had her at 54% to Bernie's 24% in the 9/11 - 9/13 poll. So even according to this inaccurate pollster, she has lost a lot of ground in the last couple of weeks.





Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
15. They're higher because, until this one, they didn't include Biden
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:23 AM
Sep 2015

And with Biden in, she is at the same level as others polls have been for 2 months.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
18. Poll trutherism at its finest.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:26 AM
Sep 2015

As others have pointed out, MC polls were higher for HRC because they didn't include Biden, which in all polls gives her about a 10 point bump over Bernie.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
31. Again, 9/11-9/13 did not include Biden
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:43 AM
Sep 2015

Her drop is the fact that they chose to include Biden.

Your assertion this poll is flawed based on past history is easily refuse by looking at Biden/No Biden timeline.

Right now, this supports the assertion NBC if the erroneous poll, not everything else from the past two months.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
25. More variation.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:08 AM
Sep 2015

Sorry, Hillary supporters, this poll does not confirm anything just like Sunday's did not confirm Bernie is over 30% yet. Polls are subject to variation just like any other data that is collected. What matters is the trend, and that trend is clear in that Hillary is declining while Sanders and Biden are rising. It's worth noting that this poll also has Trump at 31% whereas Sunday's poll had him at 21(ish)%. We'll be able to put this poll, and the last one, into context once a few more polls are released. But it might be worth considering that 3 out of the last 4 national polls have Bernie over 30%.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
27. Let's look at those three
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:38 AM
Sep 2015

Fox had Bernie at 30 in August and 30 in September. No trend change there.

Reuters' ridiculous 5 day tracking had Bernie back down to 25% two days after reporting his number at 30.

NBC/WSJ had Bernie so far outside the norm, that it is reasonable to think it is an outlier. The fact that the first poll after the WSJ number is a return to the Bernie plateau of mid20s further supports this assertion.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
35. Not really.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:57 AM
Sep 2015

You're cherry picking information and making false assumptions. Every long term poll tracker has Bernie rising on average and Hillary descending on average. That is a fact. When looking at a cloud of data points, you can't pick out one of those points and draw conclusions off of it. You have to look at what came before it, and what comes after it to put it in proper context. We'll know where the candidates stand *now* in about 2 or three weeks' time when the next round of polls come out.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
40. It is very well established Bernie is in the mid20s and has been for two months
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:08 AM
Sep 2015

The narrowing of the gap between Clinton and Sanders is due to Biden being polled which knocks her down from mid 50s to mid 40s.

Bernie is not going up in the polls except for one single poll. Cherry picking info is going off that one poll versus the abundance of info that says otherwise.

And set the RCP aggregate to 8/1 through today. Right around the middle of August, Berniesettled at his current level and hasn't moved since. His latest uptick is based off the NBC outlier poll and the Fox News poll that showed him with a movement of zero since August. The other three polls currently being averaged in? 24, 25, 24. Right on line with this new poll.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
43. Well then we're clearly seeing two different things.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:18 AM
Sep 2015

Yes, many polls in the last few weeks have Bernie in the mid 20s, but he's been trending upward and now we have a few polls coming out showing him in the 30s. When I see that, I see potential for him to move upward more than he already has.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
38. We haven't had our first debate yet. I'm looking forward to the start of our primary season. nt
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:07 AM
Sep 2015

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
30. Actually, two
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:41 AM
Sep 2015
But it might be worth considering that 3 out of the last 4 national polls have Bernie over 30%.



That has more to do with the vagaries of how ipsos-reuters releases their polling data, ergo:


http://polling.reuters.com/#!response/TR131/type/smallest/filters/PARTY_ID_:1/dates/20150808-20150925/collapsed/false


9-20-9-25

HRC-43%
SBS- 25%
JB-16%


 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
33. That link proves my point...
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:49 AM
Sep 2015

Even there, the trend has Bernie rising and Hillary descending. Variation will always occur, but you can clearly see the average increasing for Sanders.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
34. I am not disputing there has been movement.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:55 AM
Sep 2015

I am suggesting that the NBC poll with its 6.1 % MOE might exaggerate the movement.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
39. Probably not.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:07 AM
Sep 2015

MOE doesn't affect the accuracy of the poll, only its precision. With a 6.1% error, Bernie's floor in that poll would have been 29%, which is still continues the trend upward. His ceiling was 41%. Likewise, Hillary's floor was 37ish%. That actually puts them in a statistical tie. A pollster won't report results if their MOE is too large. Remember that poll last week when people were claiming nobody under 50 got polled? Obviously, people under 50 *were* polled, but the MOE of those demographics was so high that the pollster didn't feel confident in reporting the results. There's nothing wrong with NBC's poll.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
36. The overall average for the time period shown in that graph is 46 Clinton 25 Sanders
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:58 AM
Sep 2015

Right in line with other poll averages from August through September.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
41. Exactly, good. Now you're looking at averages.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:11 AM
Sep 2015

I've said this in other posts in this thread, but I'll say it again. We won't know where exactly the candidate's stand today for another couple of weeks once more numbers come in. Then we can go back and average more results together to see where the trendline is going.

snot

(11,804 posts)
28. So Clinton 44 vs 42 who prefer either a Socialist or someone who's not running?
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:39 AM
Sep 2015

Or did I miss Biden's announcement (quite possible)?

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
32. When was the last time a sitting vice president, candidacy announced or not, ...
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:44 AM
Sep 2015

When was the last time a sitting vice president, candidacy announced or not, is trailing a member of his own party for his party's nomination by twenty five points?


Thank you in advance.


 

twii

(88 posts)
37. Or...Sanders vs. 63% wo pick either someone you think is dishonest and a non candidate
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:00 AM
Sep 2015

Isn't spin wonderful?

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
49. Found their methodology. Note that their polls are "sponsored," but haven't found yet who sponsored
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 12:49 PM
Sep 2015

this one. I've written to the article author to find out.

Poll with us.
National Public Opinion Poll (Price: $33,750/Poll)

Our weekly national polls are conducted among 2,000 registered voters. The questionnaire is developed collaboratively with clients and includes 45 questions, plus demographic and screening questions. Fielding a national public opinion poll with Morning Consult ensures your poll findings will reach our elite audience of government and industry leaders.

http://morningconsult.com/about/

Here's more on this specific poll:
The Morning Consult tracking poll surveyed 1,543 registered voters between Sept. 24-27, for a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. A subsample of 637 self-identified Republicans and Republican-leaning independents carried a margin of error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points. The subsample of 643 self-identified Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents carried an identical margin of error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.

Honeylies

(77 posts)
50. FWIW Pollster would likely prefer to see Hillary vs Bernie in office
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 02:54 PM
Sep 2015

Michael Ramlet, the founder and CEO of Morning consult, bio:

"Michael Ramlet is a domestic policy and economic expert. He leads Purple Policy, a consulting practice that advises government affairs, business strategy, and financial services clients on the economic impact of political and policy changes. In addition, Ramlet is the founder and editor of The Morning Consult, a daily healthcare industry and public policy briefing that is subscribed to by over 2400 policymakers and executives. He has also served as an outside adviser to the nation’s Republican Governors. Prior to joining Purple, Michael was a policy director at the American Action Forum."

Source: https://carlsonschool.umn.edu/person/michael-ramlet

American Action Forum aka American Action Network: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/American_Action_Network

Purple Policy is part of Purple Strategies, another right-left alliance sort of thing. Hired to do the PR for the Deepwater Horizon Spill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_Strategies

Not to be all tinfoil hat. It's just worth noting. Morning Consult seems a bit sketchy iMHO

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»New national poll (sept. ...