Don't Forget To Visit http://hillaryclintonsupporters.com ... To See If They're Dissing On You...

[WillyT]

http://hillaryclintonsupporters.com/

Of course you have to register... so it's not worth it to me.

[Snap the Turtle]

1. Blocked at local firewall

Can't seem to get in... oh well.

Not even worth a visit, I guess.

[WillyT]

6. Well... Go Here... You'll Get The Idea.

DULink: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251623308

[Catherina]

2. Oh goodness no. I've blocked them here, why go there to read

even worse stuff than they're posting here?

[Zorra]

10. +1 nt

[Fumesucker]

3. Civility is so confining for some...

[jfern]

4. They hid most of their forums

They don't want us to see how they are purposefully alert stalking users they don't like. Cowards.

[hifiguy]

128. They alerted on me last night.

The alert was slapped down 6-1. Looks like "their" juries aren't very effective.

[onecaliberal]

5. I couldn't care less.

Seems they have abandoned this place.

[WillyT]

12. Me Neither... I'm Just Wondering About How Proud They Are Of That Site... Not Much It Seems...

[zappaman]

27. Yeah, you don't care.

That's why you started an OP about it.

[sabrina 1]

53. You're still here?

I clicked on the link posted here and got the impression that site, like that other one I won't give a mention to, is for people who hate DU? I assumed they were out of here. Or were you just visiting?

[onecaliberal]

36. I think it's funny how they created a whole other site

[questionseverything]

115. i just want to know who paid for it n/t

[hifiguy]

129. 50 to 1 it's bankrolled out of HRH's huge stash

of dark money.

[questionseverything]

136. i would guess you are correct but that would be just a guess

[hifiguy]

139. It looks and quacks a lot

Like a duck.

[John Poet]

168. Probably just one of the supporters.

That's a phpBB forum. One can be set up and customized in an hour or less. The only cost to set one up is the cost of your web-hosting and a domain name. I only pay $2.99 a month for my hosting account which handles multiple websites. Of course you can pay much more if you haven't shopped hosting accounts...

[dorkzilla]

15. If only...they’re still here spreading lies.

Like Bernie says social justice must take a back seat to economic justice (as if the two weren’t intertwined...).

[cyberswede]

7. We should all give zero fucks what people on other sites say.

That goes for free republic, discussionist, Old Elm Tree, and CC (both of them).

Enough already.

[Fred Sanders]

8. What? No RW Clinton speculation and links for folks to forward today?

[DURHAM D]

9. This may disappoint you Willy but no one talks about

you over there, even in the secret room.

[WillyT]

13. Damn... I Failed...

[cui bono]

151. Actually that's not true.

Sadly I spent a few minutes perusing that site and there was more than one post about Willy.

Even more sad though, is that you are privy to the 'secret room'. I will keep that in mind if I ever read any of your posts on here. The insight of knowing who hangs out at such a venomous and hate filled place is beneficial.

[DisgustipatedinCA]

11. I wouldn't sign up there. It's unsafe.

They're running software that's old and vulnerable to some well-known exploits.

[jeff47]

18. I guess it's the same team that set up Clinton's email server. (nt)

[DisgustipatedinCA]

21. I sure hope Hillary's IT job kept servers more up to date.

Granted, this is what you get when you choose a $20 managed hosting plan.

[jeff47]

22. Yeah...about that hope...

What we know so far:

1) Communications with her server were not encrypted for the first 3 months.
https://www.venafi.com/blog/post/what-venafi-trustnet-tells-us-about-the-clinton-email-server/

2) They left the default VPN keys installed on her server
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-04/clinton-s-e-mail-system-built-for-privacy-though-not-security

Using those addresses, McGeorge discovered that the certificate appearing on the site Tuesday appeared to be the factory default for the security appliance, made by Fortinet Inc., running the service.

3) They were using, and continue to use, self-signed SSL certificates
http://gawker.com/how-unsafe-was-hillary-clintons-secret-staff-email-syst-1689393042

4) They set up a .com domain, enabling the typosquater who has registered clintonmail.com (no "e" before "mail&quot . Whoever registered that domain is in a perfect position to steal login information or perform spear phishing attacks.

5) Her ISP was repeatedly hacked by China
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=615632

[Fawke Em]

85. LOL!

砍死

[FlatBaroque]

14. The policy wonks must have arrived

There are now THREE topics in the ISSUES forum

[dorkzilla]

16. Bwahahahahahahahaha

They’re workin’ the over time over there!

[840high]

72. Impressive.

[AgingAmerican]

145. Yeah I was noticing that too

Crickets in the 'issues' forum.

[in_cog_ni_to]

17. No thank you! Let them wallow in their hate.

It's so nice and civil when they're gone. Blissful!

At least I know what I suspected all along is TRUE. I visited before the firewall and cleansing took place. Now we know what they really are. And it's not nice.

[tularetom]

26. Are they really gone? I have most of them on ignore so I have no way of knowing

[in_cog_ni_to]

32. We should be so lucky.

They come in packs throughout the day to spread their Bernie hate around.

When they aren't here, it's quite noticeable and nice - like the DU of old. Peaceful, blissful, civil.

Many can't come back because they're on a time-out, so it will eventually become a raucous pit again, unless they stay on their new hate site. It fits them well.

[Capt. Obvious]

33. The fact that many are on timeout

is proof of the alert gang stalking going on here.

Before anyone posts Skinner and EarlG's analysis of alerts tell them to break it down by groups rather than raw data and the Alert Truth will be as plain as day.

[in_cog_ni_to]

34. Crock of shit.

I've never alerted on anyone, EVER. You can't say that about your gang of what? 30?
And like Skinner said, if they're on Time-out, they deserve to be there.

[sabrina 1]

58. I'll take Skinner's word for that. Don't see any reason to believe people who spend

their time bashing this site and a majority of DUers. their credibility isn't all that great.

From the first and last time I will ever click on that site, I saw an actual ADMISSION that a DUer here, Cali to be precise, was deliberately provoked by one of the members of that awful site in order to get her a time out.

Hilarious that people who set up a site to bash this site, allow people to gloat about goading DUers so they can alert on them, and then whine that THEY are the ones being alert stalked despite the assurance of the admins that it just isn't happening.

[Live and Learn]

67. Nope, they are on time out because they broke the rules

and now it is apparent that they have (and probably never had) any respect for Skinner, DU or any of the rest of us.

[AgingAmerican]

108. I am alert stalked constantly

Just have to be careful how you say things. It ain't hard.

[cui bono]

155. Or you can do this...

EDITED

[mythology]

120. Are you really claiming that Clinton supporters being on time out

Is evidence they are alert stalking Sanders supporters? If there was alert stalking going on, the people on on time out would be the ones who could claim to have been alert stalked. You don't get a time out for sending alerts. People who post in a boorish fashion get enough alerts to go on time out. It happens to both sides.

But even the raw numbers disprove alert stalking. If there there are generally fewer than 50 alerts, given that some are for obvious trolls, how are there enough alerts to qualify for stalking? Additionally given that in many of the times when Elad has posted the stats he includes if somebody was alerted on more than once. If there was targeted alert stalking, they are doing a really poor job.

[cui bono]

153. The fact that many of them are on a time out is proof that they are rude.

You want proof of alert stalking? Here you go:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=622710

And that proud prodder is on MIRT here. He himself is a MI so he should R himself from the T and the entire DU.

[delrem]

158. I doubt that proof is obvious enough, for the captain.

A fucking troll on MIRT is not enough.

[artislife]

19. Who gives a f*ck? It isn't like we really know anyone there.

It is the internet.

This forum, that forum, all are illusionary.

Very rarely does it mean anything in one's personal life.

Let it go.

[jeff47]

24. People don't know anyone in the accident by the side of the highway

they still slow down to look.

[artislife]

28. That's true

I guess what I am trying to say, is don't take it to heart if someone is mean on the internet. One, you don't know them, they don't really know you. Two, they get off on creating an emotion in others. You don't get emotional, they stay flaccid.

[sabrina 1]

74. I learned long ago that you can judge people by who their 'enemies' are on the internet. I'm proud

to say I have all the 'right' enemies!

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

20. What's with that home page?

The bottom half of the page seems to be the template that hasn't been filled in. Not very professional - kind of like going out in public with your underwear showing.

[Jesus Malverde]

64. Yeah its pretty bizarre that they couldn't finish the template...nt

[BlueJazz]

66. I was wondering about that also.

[George II]

23. What a great site! Thanks for linking it.

[jeff47]

86. Considering you post your plans to disrupt DU on that site

your post might be a tad disingenuous.

[kenfrequed]

90. Wow, really?

Cause that sounds like some pretty revolting behavior, all things considered.

I looked at that website once and it required registration and I did a cost-benefit analysis and decided against looking in on a place like that. I don't need that kind of drama.

[jeff47]

91. Yep. Here's the DU thread

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251616648

The stuff about their site starts under reply #17. Has lovely quotes and screenshots, since they turned registration on after deciding they were getting too much attention.

George II posts over there with his plan to goad DU members into getting hides. And then celebrates when he does. Just the kind a person who should be on MIRT, right?

[kenfrequed]

92. Wow.

Seriously, the anger and emotional rage and hate are pretty extreme. Glad I didn't register. I don't need to see that kind of garbage.

[MindfulOne]

95. I did.

I registered and then was bounced without ever even posting.
The latest plans are to step up the hate against Bernie's wife, Jane, and to repeat the "socialist" meme, and they're plotting to rile us up using Monica Lewinski, who recently announced a anti-bullying campaign.
http://www.people.com/article/monica-lewinsky-anti-bullying-campaign-people-magazine

If we let ourselves get involved in that there will be lots of accusations of misogyny and alerts and hidden threads.
The alert stalking is real, but it's all they can do, it's best to just not engage or to kill them with kindness if we must reply at all.

[polly7]

96. +1000. nt.

[questionseverything]

118. killing with kindness is always best

once in a while a heart might be changed

[MindfulOne]

119. That's true. It can't hurt to be amicable, we will need to come together.

For now, try to rise above it and admit that we, too, are passionate, just about different candidates.

And let it go.

I didn't think it could get nastier, overall, than it was in 2007-8 but it's shaping up to be just as bad.

Citizens United and DWS did not help, and Clinton is more desperate this time around, it's truly her last and only shot.

[cui bono]

156. Here's a great post from it!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=622710

Have you resigned from MIRT yet? You clearly are not objective and show yourself to be the Malicious Intruder you are supposed to be Removing.

[winter is coming]

25. I don't care.

If they're dissing me, at least somebody else is getting a rest.

[Aerows]

75. That's my attitude, too

I have most of them on ignore here anyway, so why would I go somewhere else only to discover that I need to ignore them there, too?

[ornotna]

29. I'll pass

not the least bit interested. This reply is about as worked up as I'm going to get about the goings on over there.

[polly7]

30. I got in before they locked all the filthy stuff up ..........

officially dissed.

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

[Alittleliberal]

31. 6 months of bullshit

6 months of lying, distorting, a refusal to discuss issues, projection, hatred and swiftboating. Then they run off with their tails between their legs claiming to be the victims. Who does that sound like?

[Godhumor]

35. Why do this?

They took their discussion off DU to get away from DU. Why bring it back to DU?

[Luminous Animal]

38. I 100% agree. A totally useless OP.

[msanthrope]

42. But if you don't clean house.....who will? nt

[Luminous Animal]

45. Ugh. "Clean house"… as odious as the OP.

[delrem]

164. Because a bunch of high post count DUers are laughing with glee over trolling for "hides",

while at the same time on DU complaining that they've been "alert stalked".
And because that is a reality that takes awhile to take in - and since it's happening now and is ongoing. This is all a process that's been ongoing for months and humans do have emotions. Sometimes a person just can't hold in the scream.

Remember the #berniesoblack joke?
Yah, that shit - the trolling.

It's not up to us to pretend that it didn't/doesn't exist. It's up to the trolls to put an end to it, since it's clearly orchestrated and even has its own forum, just like "the cave".

and... David Brock.

[artislife]

84. That really isn't true..but thankfully it is locked so we

will be blissfully unaware and no one will bring any posts back. And soon they will recede from memory....and life will be completely joyful.

[jeff47]

87. Because many of them are still on DU

And when their time-outs expire, it's nice to know who they really are.

[Comrade Grumpy]

107. They got away from DU so they could plot their attacks on certain DU factions.

Pathetic and infantile.

[hifiguy]

132. It's not even high school.

More like elementary school or even pre-school.

[oasis]

37. Spouses who abuse their mates and then seek out their safe houses

should first do some soul searching.

Relationships 101.

[betsuni]

62. +1

[TM99]

82. Wait, so now y'all are spouses

that have been abused and Sanders supporters at DU are the abusive husbands?!

Let's add that to the bullshit that y'all are slaves and Sanders supporters at DU are the slaveholders.

The hyperbolic victimhood would be comical if it wasn't so disturbing and offensive to, you know, the actual history of slavery or actual abused & battered spouses!

[MoveIt]

93. I share your disgust at this incredible posturing

they have weaponized their offensive trolling.

That the poster above would try and invoke domestic abuse in the context of their planned disruptions to this site is beyond the pale, and is a good reinforcement of why I have that disgusting poster and all of it's freakish friends over there on full ignore.

[oasis]

94. "Battered spouses"? "Slaves"? . Feel free to add your own

words which serve to validate exactly what I alluding to in the metaphor.

[polly7]

97. Truly disgusting isn't it? nt.

[bunnies]

106. As a victim of actual spousal abuse, I find your post really fucking disgusting.

I hope you are so clueless as to have to fucking idea how offensive this is.

[mccallen]

111. Im a Clinton supporter

And I think that website went too far and oasis went too far.

This is eye opening and not in a good way. Im starting to back away from Clinton now with her recent statements on higher education and repealing the Cadillac tax.

Both moves were wrong, and its starting to make me re-examine my choices.

Thanks for the eye opener.

[bunnies]

116. Im not a Clinton supporter...

but in her defense, I believe most Democrats want to real the Cadillac tax. I could be wrong though. Its happened before.

[oasis]

112. Abuse is abuse is abuse. Verbal or otherwise. I find

site stalking offensive, which is the purpose of the OP.

[bunnies]

117. Me getting my bones broken is the same as someone getting feelings hurt on the internet?

Thats just sick.

[oasis]

127. My father and stepfather physically abused my mom.

My sister and I never got used to it. Over the years I have, on many occasions, stepped in to break up, or report on abusive situations.

When I was in the workforce, payroll deductions for safe houses were among my contributions to the Combined Federation Campaign each year.

The metaphor in my post upthread wasn't written from a ivory tower perspective. My heart goes out to anyone who has suffered abuse. I'm sorry for what you have endured in your relationship.

[polly7]

123. +1,000,000. nt.

[Blue_In_AK]

39. Not worth it to me either, WillyT

I try to approach everyone here with equanimity (or not at all, if I find them distasteful) so if someone has an issue with me, I'll have to assume it's totally unwarranted.

[Luminous Animal]

40. Really, Willy? Why did you post this awful divisive OP?

[SMC22307]

41. Meh. Enjoy the silence...

while they're gone, cuz you know they'll be back. Their crappy little site won't get any traction, just like the Sensible Centrist Democrats for Progress is a big ol' loser.

[NanceGreggs]

43. And don't forget ...

... that if you've always wished that the HRC supporters would leave DU, congratulations! THEY HAVE!

Concerned that DU isn't as much fun as it used to be when you had HRC supporters to denigrate, belittle, demean, and alert on in hopes of yet another hide or time-out? Well, they've now moved elsewhere - but that doesn't mean you have to abandon your bashing of the Democratic front-runner - you simply have to post a link to their site and pretend that you still have control over what they post!

"See if they're dissin' you" - because that's what this election is really all about, who's dissin' who on the internetz! If BS supporters get dissed more often on a website than HRC supporters get dissed on DU - well, that's what will determine who is the next POTUS, make no mistake about it!

Do you ever wonder why some people, instead of taking advantage of their dominance of one website, find it necessary to link to another website and comment on what's being said there instead of here? Do you ever wonder why people made unwelcome on DU have created their own space to discuss their candidate-of-choice without being harassed - and why BS supporters can't stand the thought of people posting on a site they can't control?

Well, now's your chance to pretend that such things actually matter! Now's your golden opportunity to act like an HRC-supporting site has a god-damned nerve NOT joining The Cult! This is the time that try BS-supporters' souls - and an opportunity to link to the blasphemers' website so that they might be smitten with the sword of thy vengeance and exposed as non-believers!



For the movie version, I see Ben Affleck as the perpetually irate DUer who obsessively links to "non-Bernie sites" in an attempt to wake up the few hundred people who still post there, Julia Roberts as the HRC supporter who is harassed by on-line BS fanatics due to her refusal to drink the kool-aid, and Jeff Bridges - in a reprise of his role as "The Dude" - explaining how "Well, like that's just your opinion, man" has little to do with reality.

[oasis]

46. Or the Stanley Kowalski character in "A Streetcar Named Desire".

"Stellaaaaa.......Stellaaaa"

Btw see post #37

[Chan790]

48. You misunderstand...

I don't want them to leave DU, (...well, actually...yes, that too) I want them to leave the Democratic party and take the Clintons with them.

[NanceGreggs]

49. And when ...

... the Clinton supporters all leave the party, what do the rest of you that are left plan to do - all twelve of you?

[Chan790]

51. Build an actual party of progressives devoid of quislings & corporatists along with their enablers?!

I thought that was obvious.

[NanceGreggs]

54. If it's so obvious ...

... why don't you start a political party based on that platform, and those parameters for membership?

And then what do you plan to do - all twelve of you?

[Chan790]

59. Win real victories voting for candidates worth voting for.

Also, there are more than twelve of us; there's clearly enough us to make Hillary's coronation more of a horse race than Clintonbots are comfortable with...it's why your Goldwater Girl and her campaign staff of RW ideologues are shitting themselves and worrying why they can't make the "Socialist" label, the "Jew" label or the "Racist" label stick against a real progressive offering real solutions and real change.

[NanceGreggs]

130. ...

"Hillary's coronation", "Goldwater Girl", "campaign staff of RW ideologues" - what a non-creative use of the usual worn-out cliches!

In case you don't read the polls, HRC is the front-runner, and BS is still a very distant second. So no one is "shitting themselves and worrying" about anything.

[840high]

73. ugh i don't know why

i bother reading - you used to be interesting.

[ibegurpard]

144. really?

When was that?

[reddread]

79. PUMA's pounce!

[Metric System]

50. So you're a small tent Democrat.

[Chan790]

56. Not necessarily, but too small for the likes of Hillary's friends.

This man is not a Democrat; he's just deluded enough to think he is.


Neither is this one.


Certainly not this guy.


Or this woman.

Actually, it doesn't seem that Sec. Clinton has many friends that aren't actually Pretender Democrats.

[Metric System]

57. It's good that we have you to decide who's a Democrat and who's not.

[Chan790]

61. You're welcome. :)

[betsuni]

60. +1

[YabaDabaNoDinoNo]

83. HRC Supporters can stay in DU who gives a crap, they need to be GONE from the Democratic Party

why because they are the problem, the corporate/conservative/DLC DEMs are the ones holding the party back, they are the ones who always F-up good legislation.

Yeah, Yeah Yeah big tent and all that jazz but the big tent needs to EXCLUDE the corporatists and those beholden to wall street, let those that do join the GOP or another party.

Lets pretend that HRC does get the Democratic Party nomination, if she does, we will see the LOWEST voter turn out in history and people will sit home, vote for someone else and many will leave the Democratic Party to the great delight to her supporters.

As long as the corporatists are in the democratic party the perception of uniparty will continue further discouraging people to vote why because it is pointless when both the R and D have the same agendas of doing Wall Streets bidding..

[NanceGreggs]

134. Good thinking!

Right now, the majority of the Party supports Hillary - and you think they should all leave?

Hmmm ... doesn't sound like something a Democrat would say.

[Cleita]

104. Thank you and your minions for that.

The fresh air left behind on DU is exhilarating. Enjoy your new site. I truly mean that.

[cui bono]

160. So do the 3 issues threads in the Clinton Cave sum up what the election is about then?

And I guess it wasn't about anything until it was noted over here on DU that the "Issues" forum at the Clinton Cave wasn't open for posting an entire month after all the hate began to be spewed in numerous other forums there.

Even this post of yours over here is full of hate. So sad.

Do you ever wonder why some people, instead of taking advantage of their dominance of one website, find it necessary to link to another website and comment on what's being said there instead of here? Do you ever wonder why people made unwelcome on DU have created their own space to discuss their candidate-of-choice without being harassed - and why BS supporters can't stand the thought of people posting on a site they can't control?

Do you ever wonder why supporters of a candidate who is less popular on a particular website have the need to go make another website for the sole purpose of spewing their hatred of those who support the candidate who is more popular on that first website? Do you ever wonder why they never discuss issues (as noted above) and choose to attempt to smear the opposing candidate and that candidate's supporters? Do you ever wonder why you get things so damn wrong all the time? Do you ever tire of being an apologist? How sad that you are actually defending such vile hatred. Even more pathetic that you are participating in it.

[beam me up scottie]

165. NAILED it.

[revmclaren]

44. Thank you so much for the promotion of this site...

I just posted the following on my Facebook page

http://hillaryclintonsupporters.com/

Please share this link with your friends, neighbors, family and coworkers. New posting board highly recommended by even the the most passionate Sanders supporters on Democratic Underground.

http://democraticunderground.com

[leftofcool]

146. We really should thank them for all the new members.

[MisterP]

47. they went live Aug. 25, 2015? hm!

[sabrina 1]

52. Ugh, willy, why would anyone want to do that? Once is more than enough.

[Metric System]

55. Not content with driving away Hillary supporters from DU, our intrepid OP seeks to hunt down every

Hillary supporter online and drive them off the Internet completely. Or something like that. Wait, what's the point of this thread again?

[JoePhilly]

110. Over on Discussionist, they are obsessed with DU.

Here on DU, we seem to have some members that are obsessed with a site that's pro-Hillary.

Go figure.

[AgingAmerican]

140. They advertised their little site here on DU the day it went 'live'

But thanks for trying.

[Metric System]

142. And some here have been obsessed ever since.

[AgingAmerican]

143. There goes your 'hunted' hypothesis

[applegrove]

63. I got invited to that site and another one. What makes people

think these are not just attempts by the right to shut Hillary supporters up on the DU? I haven't gone to either site I was invited to. But what makes you think these are really the Hillary supporters they claim to be? Seems to me there is no way to know. Why two sites? Do more than two entities want Hillary supporters to have another place? If I sign up there at give my du name will they put cookies in my computer that can garner my real name and address so they can write me a letter? We don't know what is up with the two sites. Reeks of gaslight ing. I suggest we stick to the DU. There is a Hillary group on the DU for her supporters to go get some supportive responses, unmolested by Bernie folk.

[Live and Learn]

68. I think the site is doing a vast disservice to Hillary. nt

[applegrove]

71. What makes you think it is being organized by real Hillary supporters. Stick

with the DU Hillary group. At least that is being moderated and owned by people we know and trust.

[Aerows]

76. applegrove, that is

an excellent point!

[applegrove]

80. Why would we leave the DU to talk about Hillary. God only

knows what reindeer games are going on outside in ways Skinner cannot mitigate. I also alert anytime someone invites me to leave the DU.

[Aerows]

81. As I posted earlier

I have most of them on ignore anyway, why would I go somewhere else only to decide to ignore them there?

[jeff47]

88. Because there are members on that site that are in the DU Clinton group. (nt)

[Metric System]

99. Hunt them down! We need names, dammit.

[jeff47]

102. :eyes:

If the poster above is claiming DU is all that matters, they should consider the same people appear in both places.

[cui bono]

161. The people promoting, participating in and defending it are DU Hillary supporters.

Not sure what point you are trying to make when they are the ones proudly claiming the site as their "safe haven" for spewing hatred. They don't want to stay on DU because they can't be assholes here. Well, not as candidly.

[Metric System]

98. The Hillary group on DU is not a safe space. Neither is the AA group. A number of members have been

alerted on even though posts were within those groups.

[polly7]

103. As have members in every group. nt.

[Comrade Grumpy]

109. Even within protected groups, you have to play by DU rules.

Don't think you can lob shit bombs from your protected sanctuary and get away with it. Then you'll be fine.

[Fumesucker]

167. Indeed, the protected Atheists & Agnostics group gets alert stalked all the time

[leftofcool]

147. Un-molested by Bernie supporters? Not really

And by the way, there are at least 100 Hillary forums on the internet, we are only one of those.

[Live and Learn]

65. Good grief, the other unmentionable site that starts with an F is more welcoming.

At least I can see the posts on that site.

Then again, since nobody else can see the posts on their private and exclusive club I really don't care. It kind of sums up the kind of world they want to live in.

[Cleita]

105. Well they did their best to shut up all debate and discussion other than

their narrow views on this website, so it figures they would have the same country club attitude on their website. Good riddance. Feel the Bern.

[BlueJazz]

69. I looked at the site. Needs work with the code but if that's what they want that's fine. Seems..

...a shame the way this election is developing. (regarding the animosity factor)

[Maedhros]

70. Nothing there is of interest to me.

No need to spend time there.

[Ken Burch]

77. Have they mentioned me yet? n/t.

[MineralMan]

89. How is this about the Democratic primaries.

It's a meta post about some other website. I can't see how it belongs in this forum.

[Metric System]

100. Apparently it's allowed, judging by the multiple threads on the topic that are still open:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=623308

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=633770

[MineralMan]

101. Yes. I'm aware of that, for sure.

There are also a couple of locked threads, one locked by an administrator of DU. I'm not a host at this time, so I have no real input into that.

[sabrina 1]

121. Then alert on it. Apparently either no one did, or the community disagreed with you.

[MineralMan]

122. I did. Apparently, the hosts disagreed with my opinion.

That's how DU works. I also stated my view publicly, and you're replying to that. I will continue to do so, and you're welcome to disagree.

[polly7]

124. Well there ya go ..........

everything's fine then.

[MineralMan]

125. Indeed. We all have a voice here.

I'll continue to use mine freely, and encourage others to do the same.

DU is not my website. I'm just a participant here. If things don't go the way I'd prefer, I don't complain about that. I just keep posting, as always.

[polly7]

126. Right on.

[sabrina 1]

138. Yes, I like the way DU works, so long as no one abuses the system, unlike, apparently those who

chose to start a whole other site where they bash DU and its members but then return here to use a site they apparently despise. Which is what this OP is about.

I have never belonged to a site that bashes DU nor would I remain on any site whose main purpose is to bash Democrats.

[JoePhilly]

113. This thread sounds like pre-teen girls gossiping at their school lunch table.

"OMG, did you hear what the mean girls over there said about you???"

"I hate them, they are so ugly!!!"

"And did you see their home page?, yuck!!"

[oasis]

114. With varying degrees of poutrage.

[leftofcool]

148. I saw that movie.

[hifiguy]

133. A couple of looks into that swine-manure lagoon

were more than enough for me.

Wouldn't go back on a bet.

[pinstikfartherin]

135. You guys are going to run good DUers off with this shit.

Seriously, I am sick of this crap. Both sides need to STFU and act like adults. There are plenty of us here that don't have a dog in this idiotic fight, whether we support Bernie or Hillary, and don't want to come here to see this every day.

I'm trashing this forum, and I hope those like me will do the same. I'll leave it to you guys. Have fun.

[TSIAS]

137. Reminds me of 2008

Wonder if this is from the same people who brought us Hillary is 44.com?

[AgingAmerican]

141. There is a thread about me there...

I am accused of being a right wing troll they just forgot to post the linky winks!

[Lancero]

149. HCS has a message for DU...

[img][/img]

I'll translate on request, though it shouldn't be to hard to figure out what their message means.

[TSIAS]

150. To be fair

That site has 106 "Democrats" registered. And a handful of rabid fools.

I've found a good way to deal with this sort of crap is to ignore it. That's why FOX is blocked on my TV, Hillary Clinton Forum is trashed on DU, and that site is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.

My guess is that most are actually conservatives just trying to agitate.

[neverforget]

154. How mature, HCS.

Keep it classy, HCS! Speaks volumes of what kind of people they are.

[polly7]

159. Someone actually took time to make that .......... pretty sad when you think about it. nt.

[PatrickforO]

152. Now you have to register and login to political pub.

But only political pub. The rest of the rooms are open.

Funny, that. I guess they wanted another 'safe haven.'

[polly7]

157. Oh no ........... 'Grumble' - the worst, was locked first.

There was all sorts of stalkeryish, ugly crap in there to see before they locked it up tight.

[cui bono]

162. Or not so tight...

[polly7]

163. Ohhhh!

[Katashi_itto]

166. K&R!