2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMessage auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Original post)
Post removed
newfie11
(8,159 posts)I had no idea he was involved in both of those.
beveeheart
(1,541 posts)he voted for it because of the influence of credit card companies in Delaware.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)They were employing a lot of people in Delaware at the time. Senators represent their states. They don't do what you think is "right." They do what the people in their states need.
appalachiablue
(44,024 posts)black and brown persons for non violent offenses and from harsher sentences, all to increase profits for the exploitive, and lucrative privatized prison industrial complex (PIC).
Biden was also very close to the banking industry in Delaware, and involved with the Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas proceedings in aiding suppression of further evidence I believe.
Overall Vice President Biden has many years of experience to his credit and also is a personable, reliable, likeable and very skilled politician and party faithful in the Democratic political system.
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)Or so I keep getting told....
99Forever
(14,524 posts)But feel free to run Joe, Hillary needs the help.
turbinetree
(27,551 posts)if you are on Social Security and cannot pay for your education, which you were told would help you (retrain) to get a job after it was outsourced by a "trade deals" and the current one TPP coming into play,and now that the oligarchy have bought everything in the legislative system ,you can have your social security check garnished to pay for that education---------------you cannot submit a claim for bankruptcy because of this law.
If you have a job making $7.25 and you have banks bankrupting your savings, homes, and anything else that is not tied down because of there greed and you get laid off and are using unemployment benefits to survive, the bankruptcy law does not save you, -----------you have to pay under chapter 11, there basically is no chapter 13, unless after you lose everything and are standing on a street corner with a card board sign you still don't get relief, they can still come after you.
And for all of you out there in the hinder land some of your past senators are not there , but it is a very fair question to ask those that now are in this chamber how they would have voted if they were in office at that time.
And if they give some mealy mouth response that it is already law, then a fair questions is if they would over turn this law
You will note that one senator did not vote---------------her husband was having heart surgery
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00044
http://jinchi.blogspot.com/2007/03/hillary-clinton-and-bankruptcy-bill-of.html
Honk---------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
Ilsa
(64,371 posts)Student loans have become a big scam, thanks to moving it to the private sector and trade deals. Sometimes I think politicians want the US to break up.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Also voted for DADT. He's Senator What's In Your Wallet.
ToxMarz
(2,931 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)seafan
(9,387 posts)Joe Biden has two major problems if he decides to run for the presidency. Here is one.
Here is another.
Joe Biden's Forgotten Disgrace
Anita Hill testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee. (via USNews)
By Joe I mean Joseph R. Biden Jr., the affable vice president, who will be 74 if sworn in as president on Jan. 20, 2017. It's a safe bet Clarence Thomas will still be kicking around this town then. They are forever locked in as the principal male characters in Washington's watershed drama on sexual harassment. The Thomas Supreme Court confirmation hearing riveted the nation in the fall of 1991. (Thanks, George H.W. Bush.) Did Thomas intimidate Biden into cutting the hearing short without calling further witnesses?
It's hard to know, but the reason Thomas is sitting silently on the Supreme Court for 22 years and counting can be traced back to Biden. If you've seen the new documentary, "Anita," it jogs your memory clearly and cleanly regarding what went down. Of all the Senate Democrats, Biden failed most miserably. The close 52 to 48 vote might have broken differently if he had displayed grit under fire.
.....
The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing was a searing experience building to a crescendo over several days. As chairman, Biden virtually handed the gavel to Thomas at a critical point. He allowed three senators Orrin Hatch, Alan Simpson and the late Arlen Spector to viciously besmirch Anita Hill, a painstakingly proper law professor who came forward to testify that Thomas had sexually harassed her with lewd language and social invitations as her boss at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
In the documentary, Hill emerges content with a new lease of life, with no regrets about telling her truth. As the documentary points out, it became a question of her character on trial, when Thomas was the subject of the hearing and often out of the room. When he came back, he furiously declared the hearing a "high tech lynching," a statement that rocked the row of senators into silence. Of course, even if it was wrong, this hostility packed quite a punch.
The coup de grace was accompanied by Biden's nervous assurances: "You have the benefit of the doubt, Judge." There was no legal precedent for such a claim on truth or guilt in a Supreme Court hearing. But Biden kept saying that fateful phrase on national television. The late Sen. Robert C. Byrd challenged Biden publicly by saying the country should have the benefit of the doubt. Byrd was a lone voice in the wind, which was blowing Thomas's way.
For the record, not many who voted for Thomas remain in the Senate. But if just a few had had the courage to vote against their party, taking Hill at her word, we might not have to endure endless extremism from one of the justices on the highest court.
The group includes Republican Sens. Dan Coats, Thad Cochran, Charles Grassley, John McCain, Orrin Hatch, Mitch McConnell and Richard Shelby. If I see them in the halls, I'll be sure to tell them about "Anita." Maybe their minds have moved on Thomas over the years, but somehow I doubt it.
Elections really do have consequences.
appalachiablue
(44,024 posts)to Ms. Hill, all women and the nation. And look what we got on SCOTUS as a result like you say. I really look forward to seeing the film "Anita".
Gloria
(17,663 posts)odious, false "Partial Birth Abortion" crap (no such thing), gaffes, plagiarism charges and GROPING of wives on tape...
Biden is now jerking everyone around...ever since he said he was considering a run to "memorialize" his son...well, that's no reason to run....
Baitball Blogger
(52,350 posts)He had a moment to make a difference, and he made the wrong choice. And he has done that several times.
I think his time to ascend is over.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)stupidicus
(2,570 posts)to hell with him and his big brother ways, and the happy face he'd put on them...
Baitball Blogger
(52,350 posts)He can't win. So the question is, will his participation help Hillary or Bernie Sanders?
treestar
(82,383 posts)And thinks they will never have to declare bankruptcy.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Biden's record has a lot of things to distance himself from.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)We don't need a Pope in the White House....