2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumONE MORE TIME: Why doesn't McCain just prove Reid is wrong?
McCain has 22 years of returns. He knows the answer. Yes or no?
On Edit: screwed up and said "Gingrinch" originally. My bad.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)rfranklin
(13,200 posts)uh...yeah...John McCain
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)McCain knows what's in them and he's probably kept his trap shut to avoid being called out on it. There's got to be something REALLY bad if he thought Palin was a better candidate!
On Edit: Thanks for picking that up rfranklin. Dumb mistake.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)I thought maybe Gingrich had found something when he was running in the primaries.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)ellenfl
(8,660 posts)HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Alas, Rmoney is going to lose and Newtie will be spending all his free time with the animals at the zoo. Even if Rmoney did win, Rmoney would fuck over Newtie.
NAPrinc
(17 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,665 posts)Thats where the proof is.
NAPrinc
(17 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,665 posts)NAPrinc
(17 posts)mac56
(17,821 posts)NAPrinc
(17 posts)If I accused Reid of some malfeasance wouldnt you expect me to provide evidence before he had to clear his name?
sofa king
(10,857 posts)Know this: Romney's behavior has tipped his own hand.
He would have released the returns and avoided the drubbing he is getting if he were innocent of all charges. He would have done it years ago.
Instead, he is covering up, and the cover-up always conceals a larger crime or indiscretion.
So the only question now is whether Mitt is guilty of something that will end his political career (it has to be that big because he is risking the Presidency by refusing to disclose), or if Mitt is guilty of something actually criminal in nature (which would be more in keeping with the size of the risk he is taking).
Or both. Romney may have been a tax felon who took advantage of the 2009 amnesty program.
But the one thing he ain't is innocent, and that is proven by Mitt's cover-up.
If this were a court of law the judge would have instructed the jury to assume that because Mitt refuses to release the evidence that could exonerate him, the unseen documents are to be included as evidence against him.
We can and should do the same.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,665 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)I'll miss him.
Justice wanted
(2,657 posts)HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Shrek
(4,428 posts)Surely there's a law against those kinds of disclosures.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)Probably can't even have someone's tax returns unless responsible for preparation of the returns.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)He's been rather silent on the issue.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)we know it`s really bad because his next and last choice was sarah. sarah did`t have a fbi vetting before she was announced.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)They only vet government appointees.
madinmaryland
(65,729 posts)he could not release someone else's returns, even if he did have them.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)madinmaryland
(65,729 posts)HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Shrek
(4,428 posts)McCain, whose 2008 presidential campaign reviewed Romney's tax records as they considered him to be the vice presidential running mate, said last month he can "personally vouch" that there was "nothing disqualifying" in the tax returns of the presumptive GOP presidential nominee.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/08/02/romney-to-reid-put-up-or-shut-up/
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)That may be why McCain would not do it. If Reid really does have a source that source has committed a felony.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)He left it to his "team". I bet Steve Schmidt would know way more. McCain was oddly detached throughout the 2008 Campaign.
ThomThom
(1,486 posts)rMoney probably made him sign a non-disclosure agreement to see the returns and he would never break his word
dsteve01
(312 posts)Who knows, maybe he will pull an Eisenhower and be like, "I'm retiring now, everybody in my party has lost their mind. Oh, and by the way, Mitt Romney is a Corrupt (Bystander)."